GSA's $21.2M Electric Utilities Contract with Reliant Energy Faces Scrutiny Over Firm Fixed Price and Limited Small Business Participation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,195,950 ($21.2M)

Contractor: Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2008-10-01

End Date: 2013-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Energy

Official Description: ELECTRIC UTILITIES

Place of Performance

Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77002

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $21.2 million to RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: ELECTRIC UTILITIES Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC for electric power distribution in Texas represents a significant expenditure of $21.2 million. 2. The firm fixed price contract structure may limit flexibility in adapting to fluctuating energy market prices. 3. The absence of small business participation raises concerns about equitable opportunity and potentially missed cost savings. 4. The General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service managed this contract, highlighting its role in essential utility procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The firm fixed price contract for electric power distribution at $21.2 million over five years suggests a benchmark price based on anticipated market conditions. Without detailed cost breakdowns or comparison to other utility contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess if this price was optimal, especially given the long duration.

Cost Per Unit: $11,614 per year (average)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. However, the specific pricing outcomes and whether the lowest price technically achievable was secured are not detailed, leaving room for potential price discovery improvements.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium if the firm fixed price did not adequately account for market volatility or if competition did not drive the absolute lowest cost.

Public Impact

Government agencies rely on consistent and affordable electricity, making utility contracts critical for operational continuity. The long-term nature of this contract impacts budget predictability for the Public Buildings Service. The lack of small business involvement in this substantial contract could be a missed opportunity for economic development and diversity in federal contracting.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of small business participation
  • Firm fixed price in a volatile market
  • Long contract duration (5 years)

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition
  • Secured a major utility provider

Sector Analysis

Electric utilities are a critical infrastructure sector, essential for government operations. Spending benchmarks vary widely by region and consumption needs, but a $21.2 million contract over five years for distribution services in Texas indicates a substantial requirement.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that opportunities for small businesses in providing electric power distribution services were either not pursued or not met by the prime contractor, potentially limiting broader economic impact.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration, through its Public Buildings Service, is responsible for managing numerous federal real estate and facility-related services, including utilities. Oversight would focus on ensuring contract compliance, performance, and adherence to pricing terms.

Related Government Programs

  • Electric Power Distribution
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of small business participation
  • Potential for overpayment due to firm fixed price in a volatile market
  • Long contract duration may not reflect current market conditions
  • Limited transparency on price discovery effectiveness

Tags

electric-power-distribution, general-services-administration, tx, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $21.2 million to RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC. ELECTRIC UTILITIES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-10-01. End: 2013-09-30.

What was the rationale for choosing a firm fixed price contract for electric power distribution over a longer period, given potential market fluctuations?

A firm fixed price contract provides budget certainty for the government, shielding it from unexpected price increases. However, in a volatile market like energy, it can also mean missing out on potential savings if prices decrease. The rationale likely centered on predictable budgeting and risk transfer to the contractor, assuming the contractor's bid adequately factored in potential market shifts over the five-year term.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible price was achieved for taxpayers, considering the contract's scale?

Full and open competition theoretically allows multiple bidders to vie for the contract, driving down prices through market forces. However, the effectiveness depends on the number and quality of bids received, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria. Without further details on the bidding process and the number of responsive offers, it's difficult to confirm if the absolute best price was secured or if there were opportunities for further negotiation or alternative pricing structures.

What steps, if any, were taken to encourage or include small businesses in the subcontracting opportunities for this large electric utility contract?

The provided data indicates no small business participation (sb: false). This suggests that either no specific goals were set for small business subcontracting, or the prime contractor, Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC, did not engage small businesses for this particular contract. Federal policy often encourages small business participation, and its absence here warrants further inquiry into the contracting officer's efforts to promote it.

Industry Classification

NAICS: UtilitiesElectric Power Generation, Transmission and DistributionElectric Power Distribution

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGUTILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: NRG Energy, Inc (UEI: 793422213)

Address: 1000 MAIN ST, HOUSTON, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,195,950

Exercised Options: $21,195,950

Current Obligation: $21,195,950

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-10-01

Current End Date: 2013-09-30

Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-12-19

More Contracts from Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC

View all Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending