CACI, INC. - FEDERAL awarded $23.8M for Communication Integration Services by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,758,543 ($23.8M)

Contractor: CACI, Inc. - Federal

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2011-09-30

End Date: 2016-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,766 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: COMMUNICATION INTEGRATION SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33621

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $23.8 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL for work described as: COMMUNICATION INTEGRATION SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in communication integration. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a robust bidding process for this service. 3. Performance period of nearly five years indicates a long-term need. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and manage financial risk. 5. The award falls within the Public Relations Agencies NAICS code. 6. Geographic focus on Florida suggests a regional or specific operational need.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award of $23.8 million over approximately five years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar communication integration contracts would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm fixed-price structure indicates an effort to establish clear cost expectations upfront, which is a positive sign for cost control. The number of bids received (12) also suggests a competitive environment that likely contributed to a reasonable price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 12 bids received. This indicates a healthy level of interest and a broad range of potential providers. The significant number of bidders suggests that the government had a good opportunity to select the most capable and cost-effective solution. The competitive process likely drove down prices compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at a fair market price and encourages innovation among contractors to offer competitive bids.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is likely the General Services Administration (GSA) and potentially other federal agencies requiring communication integration services. Services delivered are expected to enhance or manage communication systems and strategies. The contract has a geographic impact focused on Florida. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for communication specialists and support staff within CACI and potentially its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial requirements are not clearly defined.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical communication integration services.
Risk of vendor lock-in if switching providers becomes difficult or costly.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market and potentially better pricing.
Long performance period allows for sustained service delivery and relationship building.

Sector Analysis

Communication integration services fall within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of specialized expertise, from IT consulting to public relations. The market size for such services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for agencies to modernize and optimize their communication strategies and systems. This contract represents a specific instance of federal spending within this dynamic sector, likely supporting agency operational efficiency or public outreach efforts.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. The award to CACI, Inc. - Federal, a large business, suggests that small business participation may be limited unless actively pursued through subcontracting opportunities. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business goals were incorporated into the contract requirements or if CACI has a history of engaging small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and financial accountability. As a purchase order under a larger contract vehicle, it likely falls under the purview of GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General oversight would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Information Technology, Infrastructure, and Communications Contracts
Government Public Relations and Advertising Services
Agency-Specific Communication Modernization Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Risk of technology obsolescence over the 5-year period.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical communication functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $23.8 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL. COMMUNICATION INTEGRATION SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, INC. - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-30. End: 2016-07-31.

What is CACI, Inc. - Federal's track record with similar communication integration contracts awarded by the GSA or other federal agencies?

CACI, Inc. - Federal has a substantial track record with the federal government, including numerous contracts for IT, systems integration, and professional services. While specific details on 'communication integration' contracts require deeper database searches, CACI's broad capabilities suggest experience in areas like network management, unified communications, and strategic communication planning. Their history often involves large-scale, complex projects. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract modifications for similar awards would provide a clearer picture of their success rate, adherence to schedule, and client satisfaction in related service areas. Their extensive government contracting history indicates a familiarity with federal procurement processes and compliance requirements.

How does the $23.8 million contract value compare to the average spending on communication integration services by the GSA over the past five years?

To accurately benchmark the $23.8 million award, one would need to analyze GSA's historical spending data specifically for 'Communication Integration Services' or closely related categories (e.g., IT integration, telecommunications services, public relations technology). The average annual spend for this contract is approximately $4.76 million ($23.8M / 5 years). If GSA's average annual spending on similar services is significantly higher or lower, it would provide context. For instance, if the average is $10 million annually, this contract is below average. Conversely, if the average is $2 million, this contract represents a substantial investment. Without access to aggregated GSA spending trends for this specific service category, a direct comparison is difficult, but the annual spend is moderate for a federal contract of this nature.

What are the primary risks associated with a five-year firm fixed-price contract for communication integration services?

A primary risk with a five-year firm fixed-price contract for communication integration is the potential for the contractor to face unforeseen cost increases due to market fluctuations (e.g., inflation, technology obsolescence) or scope creep if requirements evolve significantly over the contract's life. If costs rise substantially beyond initial projections, CACI might face reduced profit margins or pressure to cut corners on quality. Conversely, if the government's needs change drastically, the fixed-price nature could make modifications expensive or cumbersome. Ensuring robust change management processes and clear initial scope definition are critical to mitigating these risks. The long duration also increases the risk of technology becoming outdated before the contract ends.

What specific communication integration capabilities does this contract likely entail, given the NAICS code 541820 (Public Relations Agencies)?

While NAICS code 541820 typically covers Public Relations Agencies, the contract description 'COMMUNICATION INTEGRATION SERVICES' suggests a broader scope that likely leverages PR expertise within a larger technological or strategic framework. This could involve integrating various communication channels (digital, traditional media, internal communications) to ensure a cohesive message and strategy. It might include managing public perception, developing communication plans for specific initiatives, crisis communication support, and potentially the technological platforms or software needed to manage and disseminate these communications. The integration aspect implies ensuring all communication efforts work together seamlessly, possibly involving coordination across different departments or agencies.

How does the number of bidders (12) impact the potential for cost savings and innovation for the government?

Receiving 12 bids for this contract is a strong indicator of robust competition, which generally benefits the government. A larger pool of bidders typically drives down prices as companies compete to win the contract, potentially leading to significant cost savings compared to a scenario with fewer bidders. Furthermore, a competitive environment encourages contractors to propose innovative solutions and efficient methodologies to differentiate themselves. This can result in the government receiving not only a better price but also higher quality services or more advanced approaches to communication integration. The high number of bids suggests that the market has sufficient capacity and interest to meet the government's needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services › Public Relations Agencies

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 4QDS97110075

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,290,388

Exercised Options: $25,201,404

Current Obligation: $23,758,543

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $727,480

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(G)

Timeline