GSA awards $23.2M for facility operations, with Versar Inc. securing the contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,219,554 ($23.2M)

Contractor: Versar, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2015-04-01

End Date: 2020-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AREA FACILITY OPERATION SPECIALIST SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: SPARTA, MONROE County, WISCONSIN, 54656

State: Wisconsin Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $23.2 million to VERSAR, INC. for work described as: AREA FACILITY OPERATION SPECIALIST SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. The contract value of $23.2 million over five years suggests a significant investment in facility operations. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a broad market search. 3. The fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty but could limit flexibility for unforeseen issues. 4. The duration of 1826 days (approximately 5 years) allows for sustained service delivery. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541990 covers 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' indicating a broad scope of potential services. 6. The contract was awarded as a purchase order, which is a common method for acquiring goods and services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $23.2 million over five years averages to approximately $4.64 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar facility operations contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the fixed-price nature suggests an expectation of predictable costs. The number of bids received (6) provides some indication of market interest, but without knowing the bid amounts, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. Six bids were received, indicating a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While six bidders suggest a degree of market interest, it's important to understand if this represents the full spectrum of capable providers or if barriers to entry limited participation.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging competitive pricing and potentially leading to better value. The presence of multiple bidders suggests that the government likely received a range of price proposals, increasing the likelihood of securing a fair market price.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Wisconsin will benefit from specialized operational support. The contract ensures the continuity of essential facility management and maintenance services. The services provided are crucial for the safe and efficient functioning of government buildings. The contract supports the workforce employed by Versar, Inc., contributing to employment in the professional services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The professional, scientific, and technical services sector is vast, encompassing a wide range of specialized expertise. Facility operations and maintenance fall under this broad category, often requiring a mix of technical, logistical, and administrative skills. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of providing these essential functions to government agencies. This contract represents a portion of the government's overall spending on maintaining its physical infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited based on the provided information. Further investigation into Versar, Inc.'s subcontracting plans would be necessary to fully assess any indirect benefits to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and financial accountability. As a purchase order, it would fall under GSA's internal procurement regulations and oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues or investigations.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facility-operations, professional-services, general-services-administration, purchase-order, fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, wisconsin, versar-inc, 541990, contract-management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $23.2 million to VERSAR, INC.. AREA FACILITY OPERATION SPECIALIST SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VERSAR, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-04-01. End: 2020-03-31.

What specific facility operations services are included under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' While the contract title mentions 'AREA FACILITY OPERATION SPECIALIST SERVICES,' the precise scope of services is not detailed. This could encompass a wide range of activities such as building maintenance, repair, environmental services, security support, space management, and specialized technical support for facility systems. A comprehensive understanding of the service deliverables is crucial for assessing performance and value.

How does the $23.2 million contract value compare to similar facility operations contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

Without specific details on the scope and duration of comparable contracts, a direct comparison of the $23.2 million value is challenging. However, for a five-year contract covering facility operations, this amount suggests a significant operational footprint or a high level of specialized services required. GSA manages a vast portfolio of facilities, and contract values can vary widely based on size, complexity, and geographic location. Benchmarking would require identifying contracts with similar service requirements and contract lengths within the federal government.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and quality assurance measures for this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or quality assurance measures established for this contract. For facility operations contracts, typical KPIs might include response times for service requests, uptime of critical systems, energy efficiency metrics, cleanliness standards, and safety compliance. Robust quality assurance processes are essential to ensure that Versar, Inc. is meeting the government's requirements effectively and efficiently throughout the contract period.

What is Versar, Inc.'s track record in performing similar federal facility operations contracts?

Information regarding Versar, Inc.'s specific track record on similar federal facility operations contracts is not included in the provided data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations, any contract awards or terminations, and their experience with contracts of comparable size and scope. Federal procurement systems often contain past performance information that could shed light on their capabilities and reliability in this domain.

What is the geographic scope of this facility operations contract?

The data indicates the contract was awarded with the state code 'WI' (Wisconsin), suggesting that the primary geographic focus for these facility operations specialist services is within Wisconsin. However, the exact facilities or installations covered within Wisconsin are not specified. The 'AREA' in the contract title might imply a regional focus rather than a single site, but further clarification would be needed to define the precise service area.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: ID04150003

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Kingswood Capital Management, LLC (UEI: 080326889)

Address: 6850 VERSAR CTR, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 22151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,269,829

Exercised Options: $23,219,554

Current Obligation: $23,219,554

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-04-01

Current End Date: 2020-03-31

Potential End Date: 2020-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-06-16

More Contracts from Versar, Inc.

View all Versar, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending