GSA's $15.4M building upgrade contract awarded to Harvey Construction Corporation for Manchester, NH facility

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,360,772 ($15.4M)

Contractor: Harvey Construction Corporation

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2004-09-16

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,475 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: FACILITY REPAIR AND BUILDING UPGRADE, NORRIS COTTON FEDERAL BUILDING, MANCHESTER, NH

Place of Performance

Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE

State: New Hampshire Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $15.4 million to HARVEY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION for work described as: FACILITY REPAIR AND BUILDING UPGRADE, NORRIS COTTON FEDERAL BUILDING, MANCHESTER, NH Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facility repair and building upgrades, indicating a need for infrastructure maintenance. 2. The contract duration of 1475 days suggests a significant scope of work for the building. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, implying a competitive bidding process. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. The project is located in Manchester, New Hampshire, impacting local infrastructure. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to similar projects in the region. The total award amount of $15.4 million for facility repair and building upgrades over nearly four years suggests a substantial investment. However, without specific details on the scope of work (e.g., square footage, types of upgrades), it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing represents good value for money. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost certainty, but the overall value proposition hinges on the successful execution and quality of the upgrades.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that the General Services Administration (GSA) sought bids from all responsible prospective contractors. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to submit proposals. The presence of 5 bids suggests a reasonable level of interest in the contract, which can contribute to price discovery and potentially lead to more favorable pricing for the government compared to less competitive solicitations.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a level playing field for contractors, which can drive down costs and ensure the government receives competitive pricing for services.

Public Impact

The Norris Cotton Federal Building in Manchester, NH, will benefit from necessary repairs and upgrades, improving its functionality and longevity. Federal employees working in the building will experience an improved and potentially safer working environment. The project supports the local construction industry in New Hampshire through job creation and economic activity. The successful completion of the project ensures the continued availability of federal office space in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during the extensive repair and upgrade work.
Risk of project delays impacting the timeline for building improvements.
Ensuring the quality of work meets federal standards for building construction and safety.
Dependency on the contractor's ability to manage a project of this scale and duration effectively.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type helps to control costs and provides budget certainty.
The contract duration of nearly four years allows for thorough execution of complex upgrades.
The project addresses essential facility repairs and upgrades, contributing to long-term asset preservation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the commercial and institutional building construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major federal agency responsible for managing government buildings, and contracts like this are typical for maintaining and upgrading its vast real estate portfolio. Spending in this sector is influenced by federal infrastructure needs, economic conditions, and government budget allocations for facilities management. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other GSA contracts for similar building sizes and upgrade scopes across different federal buildings.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless Harvey Construction Corporation voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its construction contracts, including project management, site inspections, and contract closeout procedures. The Public Buildings Service (PBS) within GSA is responsible for overseeing such projects. Accountability is generally maintained through contract terms, performance evaluations, and potential penalties for non-compliance. Transparency is often facilitated through public contract databases and reporting requirements, though detailed project-specific oversight information may not always be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
GSA Public Buildings Service Projects
Commercial Building Construction Awards
Infrastructure Improvement Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
Risk of contractor default on a long-term project.
Unforeseen site conditions could impact cost and schedule.
Quality control and assurance are critical for long-term building integrity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $15.4 million to HARVEY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. FACILITY REPAIR AND BUILDING UPGRADE, NORRIS COTTON FEDERAL BUILDING, MANCHESTER, NH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HARVEY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-16. End: 2008-09-30.

What specific types of facility repairs and building upgrades were included in this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific types of repairs and upgrades. However, contracts under NAICS code 236220 typically encompass a wide range of activities such as structural repairs, HVAC system upgrades, electrical and plumbing work, interior renovations, facade improvements, and energy efficiency enhancements. For the Norris Cotton Federal Building, these could have included anything from roof repairs and window replacements to modernization of internal systems to meet current building codes and energy standards. A comprehensive review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to ascertain the precise scope.

How does the $15.4 million award compare to similar GSA building upgrade projects in terms of cost per square foot?

Without the square footage of the Norris Cotton Federal Building and detailed cost breakdowns from the contract, a direct cost-per-square-foot comparison is not feasible. However, federal building upgrade projects can vary significantly in cost based on location, age of the building, complexity of the work, and materials used. Generally, major renovations can range from $100 to over $500 per square foot. To benchmark this $15.4 million contract, one would need to identify comparable GSA projects of similar scope and size, ideally within the same region, and analyze their total award amounts and square footage.

What is Harvey Construction Corporation's track record with GSA and federal contracts?

The provided data does not include information on Harvey Construction Corporation's specific track record with GSA or other federal agencies. To assess their performance history, one would typically look at past contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or claims. A positive track record with similar projects would indicate a lower risk for this contract, while a history of issues might raise concerns about project execution and adherence to contract terms.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract. Typically, for construction contracts, success is measured by adherence to schedule, budget, quality standards, safety regulations, and the successful completion of all specified work. GSA contracts often include clauses for performance evaluations, which would detail how the contractor's performance was assessed against these criteria throughout the project lifecycle.

How has federal spending on facility repair and building upgrades evolved over the years, and where does this contract fit in?

Federal spending on facility repair and building upgrades has historically been substantial, driven by the need to maintain and modernize a vast portfolio of government-owned and leased properties. Agencies like GSA consistently allocate significant portions of their budgets to infrastructure maintenance and improvements. This $15.4 million contract for the Norris Cotton Federal Building represents a specific investment within that broader trend. Analyzing historical GSA spending data for similar projects would reveal whether this award is in line with typical investment levels or represents a significant deviation, potentially indicating a major renovation or a shift in maintenance strategy.

What are the potential risks associated with a fixed-price contract for a project of this duration and scope?

While fixed-price contracts offer cost certainty, they carry risks for both the government and the contractor, especially for long-duration projects like this one (1475 days). For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or scope to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues arise, potentially leading to subpar results or future repair needs. Conversely, if the contractor underestimated costs or encountered significant unforeseen conditions (e.g., hazardous materials, structural problems), they might incur substantial losses. Effective contract management, clear specifications, and contingency planning are crucial to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 10 HARVEY ROAD, BEDFORD, NH, 01

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,360,772

Exercised Options: $15,360,772

Current Obligation: $15,360,772

Timeline