Naval Air Warfare Center awards $13M contract for engineering services to Anteon Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,038,301 ($13.0M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-13

End Date: 2009-10-12

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200603!060438!1700!N68936!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4012 !A!N! !Y!GM01 ! !20051013!20061012!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000003054100!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B!E!Y!A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !1700!N65888!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92135, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.0 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200603!060438!1700!N68936!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4012 !A!N! !Y!GM01 ! !20051013!20061012!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN … Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services to support Naval Air Warfare Center. 2. Anteon Corporation, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, received the award. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The period of performance spans from October 2005 to October 2009.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is $13,038,300.76. Without specific benchmarks for similar engineering services contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed carefully.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for necessary engineering services.

Public Impact

Supports critical naval aviation warfare capabilities. Potential for technological advancements in defense. Ensures continued operational readiness for naval forces.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) may not be the most cost-effective.
  • Limited information on specific performance metrics and outcomes.
  • Potential for scope creep in engineering services contracts.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Supports a critical defense agency.
  • Long-term contract provides stability for services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is a significant area of government spending, particularly within the Department of Defense. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on specialization and scope.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded to a large corporation (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.). There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, specific details on ongoing oversight for this particular contract are not provided.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract type (CPFF) can incentivize higher costs.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics.
  • Potential for undefined scope creep.
  • Limited visibility into small business subcontracting.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, ca, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.0 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200603!060438!1700!N68936!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER !N0017804D4012 !A!N! !Y!GM01 ! !20051013!20061012!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000003054100!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-13. End: 2009-10-12.

What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Naval Air Warfare Center's mission?

The contract was for 'OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES' and 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330). These services likely supported the development, testing, and maintenance of naval aviation systems and technologies. The specific contributions would involve technical expertise, system integration, and problem-solving to enhance the operational capabilities and readiness of naval air assets.

Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type, what measures were in place to control costs and prevent overruns?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts require robust government oversight to manage costs effectively. Measures typically include detailed cost tracking, regular audits, negotiation of fee structures, and clear performance standards. Without specific contract clauses or reporting, it's difficult to assess the effectiveness of these controls for this particular award.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was achieved for the government?

Full and open competition allows any interested and qualified vendor to submit a bid, fostering a competitive environment. This process typically leads to a wider range of proposals and potentially lower prices. The government evaluates these proposals based on technical merit, past performance, and price to determine the best overall value, rather than just the lowest cost.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN RD, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-10-13

Current End Date: 2009-10-12

Potential End Date: 2009-10-12 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-10-05

More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending