DoD's $29.5M Joint Training System Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,476,741 ($29.5M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-09-25

End Date: 2014-08-31

Contract Duration: 1,801 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: JOINT TRAINING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20318

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: JOINT TRAINING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Key points: 1. Booz Allen Hamilton secured a significant contract for Joint Training Information Management Systems. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (over 5 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330) is a key area for defense IT and training solutions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT/engineering service contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Awarded under full and open competition, this method typically fosters competitive pricing. However, the CPFF pricing type requires careful oversight to ensure cost efficiency and prevent contractor profit inflation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive bidding process, which aims to secure the best value. However, the CPFF structure necessitates robust oversight to control costs and ensure funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

Ensures standardized and effective training across joint military branches. Supports modernization of military training infrastructure and capabilities. Potential for improved operational readiness and interoperability. Impacts personnel involved in military training and system development. Contributes to the overall technological advancement within the Department of Defense.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing can incentivize cost escalation.
Long contract duration may not adapt well to rapidly changing technology.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.
Limited information on specific deliverables and outcomes.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, promoting market fairness.
Addresses a critical need for joint training information management.
Significant contract value indicates a substantial government requirement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting IT and information management for defense training. Spending in this area is substantial as the DoD modernizes its systems and seeks greater interoperability and efficiency in training.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, a large business. There is no indication of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided data, which could be an area for future consideration.

Oversight & Accountability

The CPFF contract type requires diligent oversight from the Department of the Navy to manage costs, ensure adherence to the fixed fee, and verify that the delivered services meet the specified requirements effectively.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure.
Long contract duration (over 5 years).
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
Potential for technological obsolescence.
No explicit mention of small business subcontracting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. JOINT TRAINING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-25. End: 2014-08-31.

What specific performance metrics were established to ensure the effectiveness and value of the Joint Training Information Management Systems under this CPFF contract?

The provided data does not specify performance metrics. For a CPFF contract, effectiveness is typically measured against defined technical requirements and delivery schedules. Robust oversight would involve tracking progress against these, ensuring the system meets the intended training objectives and provides a demonstrable return on investment for the DoD.

How does the long-term nature of this contract potentially expose the DoD to risks associated with technological obsolescence or changing training requirements?

A contract spanning over five years risks the technology becoming outdated or the training needs evolving beyond the system's initial scope. Mitigation strategies could include built-in flexibility for modifications, regular reviews of technological advancements, and clear clauses for contract renegotiation or termination if requirements significantly shift.

Given the CPFF structure, what mechanisms were in place to ensure cost control and prevent potential overruns beyond the fixed fee?

Effective cost control under CPFF relies heavily on stringent government oversight, detailed cost reporting requirements, and clear definitions of allowable costs. The contracting officer and technical team must actively monitor expenditures, validate invoices, and ensure all costs are reasonable, allocable, and necessary for contract performance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002409R3492

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $36,240,999

Exercised Options: $36,240,999

Current Obligation: $29,476,741

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4024

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline