DOE's FERC Awards $12.8M BPA Call for Phone Services to Verizon Maryland LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,787 ($12.8K)

Contractor: Verizon Maryland LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2014-10-28

End Date: 2016-09-30

Contract Duration: 703 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF NEW BPA CALL FOR PHONE SERVICES AT HAGERSTOWN

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20426

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $12,787.02 to VERIZON MARYLAND LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF NEW BPA CALL FOR PHONE SERVICES AT HAGERSTOWN Key points: 1. The contract value is $12.8 million over approximately two years. 2. The award was made to Verizon Maryland LLC. 3. The contract was not competed under SAP, raising potential competition concerns. 4. The sector is telecommunications, specifically 'All Other Telecommunications'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Pricing is a firm fixed price, but without competitive benchmarking, it's difficult to assess value. The lack of competition under SAP suggests potential for overpayment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed under SAP, indicating a limited competition approach. This likely impacted price discovery, potentially leading to a higher price than if fully competed.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid more due to the limited competition and lack of a robust price discovery process.

Public Impact

Federal agencies rely on telecommunications services for essential operations. The use of BPA calls can streamline procurement but requires careful oversight. Lack of competition can lead to higher costs for taxpayers. Verizon is a major telecommunications provider, suggesting market availability.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition
  • Lack of price benchmarking
  • Potential for overpayment

Positive Signals

  • Established vendor
  • Firm fixed price contract

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the telecommunications sector, which is crucial for government operations. Spending benchmarks for similar services can vary widely based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific consideration or set-aside for small businesses in this procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

The limited competition approach warrants oversight to ensure fair pricing and value for taxpayer dollars. A review of the justification for not competing under SAP would be beneficial.

Related Government Programs

  • All Other Telecommunications
  • Department of Energy Contracting
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition
  • Lack of price benchmarking
  • Potential for overpayment
  • No small business participation noted

Tags

all-other-telecommunications, department-of-energy, dc, bpa-call, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $12,787.02 to VERIZON MARYLAND LLC. IGF::OT::IGF NEW BPA CALL FOR PHONE SERVICES AT HAGERSTOWN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VERIZON MARYLAND LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12,787.02.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-10-28. End: 2016-09-30.

What was the justification for not competing this BPA call under SAP?

The provided data does not specify the justification for not competing this BPA call under SAP. Typically, such decisions are based on factors like urgency, existing contract vehicles, or specific agency needs. However, without this information, it's difficult to fully assess the procurement's rationale and potential impact on price.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar telecommunication services?

Without competitive bids or publicly available benchmarks for this specific service scope and duration, it is challenging to definitively compare the awarded price to market rates. The firm fixed price nature provides cost certainty, but the lack of competition prevents a direct assessment of whether it represents the best value achievable in the market.

What is the potential risk to taxpayers if this contract was not competitively priced?

The primary risk to taxpayers is paying a premium for the telecommunication services due to the absence of competitive pressure. If the vendor was not incentivized to offer the lowest possible price, taxpayers could be overcharged, diverting funds that could be used for other essential government functions or services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationOther TelecommunicationsAll Other Telecommunications

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 E PRATT ST 8TH FL, BALTIMORE, MD, 21202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,787

Exercised Options: $12,787

Current Obligation: $12,787

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FERC14A0265

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-10-28

Current End Date: 2016-09-30

Potential End Date: 2016-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

More Contracts from Verizon Maryland LLC

View all Verizon Maryland LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending