DoD's $26.9M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Design to Delivery Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,892,812 ($26.9M)
Contractor: Design to Delivery Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-11-29
End Date: 2017-11-28
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $73.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ACQUISITION SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: CRANE, MARTIN County, INDIANA, 47522
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.9 million to DESIGN TO DELIVERY INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ACQUISITION SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $26.9 million for engineering services. 2. Awarded to Design to Delivery Inc. through full and open competition. 3. Potential risk associated with cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type. 4. Spending falls within the engineering services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $26.9 million appears reasonable for engineering services, especially considering it was awarded through full and open competition. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The delivery order structure suggests it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is intended to maximize taxpayer value by fostering a competitive environment for contract awards.
Public Impact
Ensures access to specialized engineering expertise for the Department of Defense. Supports national defense objectives through critical engineering services. Promotes fair competition among qualified service providers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type can incentivize cost overruns.
- Limited duration of the contract may require follow-on procurements.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Clear contract type and scope.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under engineering services, a sector crucial for government projects requiring specialized technical expertise. Spending benchmarks for similar DoD engineering contracts vary widely based on scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms are in place. The delivery order structure implies adherence to a broader contract vehicle with its own oversight.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type.
- Short contract duration.
- Potential for cost escalation.
- Limited visibility into small business participation.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, in, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.9 million to DESIGN TO DELIVERY INC. IGF::OT::IGF ACQUISITION SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DESIGN TO DELIVERY INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-11-29. End: 2017-11-28.
What is the typical cost range for similar engineering services contracts awarded by the DoD?
The cost range for similar engineering services contracts can vary significantly based on factors like the specific engineering discipline, project complexity, duration, and the level of expertise required. Contracts can range from a few million dollars for specialized consulting to hundreds of millions for large-scale design and development projects.
What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for engineering services?
The primary risk with CPFF contracts is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts, as the government bears the cost overruns. However, the fixed fee provides some incentive for the contractor to complete the work efficiently to maximize their profit margin.
How effectively does full and open competition ensure value for taxpayer money in engineering services procurement?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by allowing all responsible sources to submit offers, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. This process helps ensure the government secures the best possible technical solution at a competitive price, thereby optimizing taxpayer investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002415R3586
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 7910 WOODMONT AVE STE 540, BETHESDA, MD, 20814
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Emerging Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,498,392
Exercised Options: $28,492,592
Current Obligation: $26,892,812
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017810D5991
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-11-29
Current End Date: 2017-11-28
Potential End Date: 2021-11-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-11-27
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)