Department of Defense awards $11.1M for facilities operations support services to Penauille Italia SPA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,075,974 ($11.1M)

Contractor: Derichebourg Multiservizi SPA

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-30

End Date: 2008-03-30

Contract Duration: 912 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200612!602300!1700!N33191!NAVFAC ENGINEERING FIELD ACTIVIT!N3319103D0203 !A!N! !N!FB00 !41 !20050930!20060331!430331103!551663750!383382967!N!PENAUILLE ITALIA SPA !CENTRO DIREZIONALE ISOLA !NAPOLI !IT!80143!00000! !IT! ! !ITALY !+000002391507!N!N!000000000000!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !561210!E! !5!B!S!H! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!1!001!B! !Z!N!Z!B!IT!N!L!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1700!N62588!0001! !

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.1 million to DERICHEBOURG MULTISERVIZI SPA for work described as: 200612!602300!1700!N33191!NAVFAC ENGINEERING FIELD ACTIVIT!N3319103D0203 !A!N! !N!FB00 !41 !20050930!20060331!430331103!551663750!383382967!N!PENAUILLE ITALIA SPA !CENTRO DIREZIONALE ISOLA !NAPOLI !IT!80143!00000! !IT! ! … Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 912 days (approximately 2.5 years) indicates a medium-term service requirement. 3. The primary service category is Facilities Support Services, a common requirement across government agencies. 4. The award amount of $11.1M falls within a moderate spending range for such services. 5. The contractor, Penauille Italia SPA, is based in Italy, suggesting potential for international service delivery. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, a major component of the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.1 million for facilities operations support services over approximately 2.5 years appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of work. However, without specific details on the services provided and the performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support in the region or for the Department of the Navy would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing is competitive and reflects good value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The absence of specific bidder numbers limits a deeper analysis of the intensity of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive prices through a robust bidding process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely Department of the Navy installations requiring facilities operations support. Services delivered include facilities operations support, which can encompass a wide range of maintenance, repair, and operational tasks. The geographic impact is primarily in Italy, where the contractor is based and services are likely performed. Workforce implications may include the employment of personnel in Italy for the provision of these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of detailed service scope makes it difficult to assess if all essential facilities operations needs are covered.
  • Geographic concentration in Italy might limit options for domestic small businesses.
  • No specific information on performance metrics or quality assurance makes it hard to gauge service effectiveness.
  • The contract's end date is in March 2008, and its current status or renewal details are not provided.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
  • The contract addresses a fundamental operational need for facilities support.
  • The contractor is an established entity, potentially bringing expertise in facilities management.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services represent a significant segment within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This contract falls under the Facilities Support Services industry (NAICS code 561210), which includes establishments primarily engaged in providing operating engineers or facility support services. The market for these services is substantial, driven by government and commercial entities requiring maintenance, repair, and operational support for their physical infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the average cost per square foot for facility maintenance across different regions and contract types.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting plans specifically targeting small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract may be limited unless subcontracting opportunities arise organically. Further analysis would require details on subcontracting goals or achievements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve the Department of the Navy's contracting officers and potentially program managers responsible for facilities operations. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance standards and deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which provide basic award information. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance Contracts
  • Navy Base Operations Support
  • Global Facilities Management Services
  • Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Contract duration exceeds 1 year.
  • Contract awarded to a foreign entity.
  • Service type is facilities operations, which can be complex to manage.
  • No specific performance metrics detailed in summary data.

Tags

department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, full-and-open-competition, services, italy, medium-value-contract, operations-support, foreign-contractor

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.1 million to DERICHEBOURG MULTISERVIZI SPA. 200612!602300!1700!N33191!NAVFAC ENGINEERING FIELD ACTIVIT!N3319103D0203 !A!N! !N!FB00 !41 !20050930!20060331!430331103!551663750!383382967!N!PENAUILLE ITALIA SPA !CENTRO DIREZIONALE ISOLA !NAPOLI !IT!80143!00000! !IT! ! !ITALY !+000002391507!N!N!000000000000!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !561210!E! !5!B!S!H! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DERICHEBOURG MULTISERVIZI SPA.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-30. End: 2008-03-30.

What specific services are included under "Facilities Operations Support Services" for this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for "FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES" under NAICS code 561210. This broad category typically encompasses a range of activities necessary for the upkeep and operation of physical facilities. These can include, but are not limited to, routine maintenance, preventive maintenance, repairs, janitorial services, groundskeeping, pest control, security services, and potentially energy management. However, the exact scope and specific deliverables for this particular contract are not detailed in the provided data. A thorough understanding would require reviewing the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS).

How does the award amount of $11.1 million compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?

Comparing the $11.1 million award for facilities operations support services requires context regarding the contract's duration and scope. This contract spans approximately 2.5 years (912 days). To benchmark effectively, one would need to analyze similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy for comparable services, ideally in similar geographic locations or for similar types of installations. For instance, if similar 2-3 year contracts for facilities support at naval bases averaged between $5 million and $15 million, this award would appear within a typical range. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state whether this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value.

What is the track record of Penauille Italia SPA in performing government contracts, particularly for facilities support?

The provided data identifies Penauille Italia SPA as the contractor. However, it does not offer details on their past performance, contract history, or specific experience with government facilities support services. To assess their track record, one would need to consult other government contract databases or performance evaluation reports. A positive track record with successful past performance on similar contracts would indicate a lower risk for this award. Conversely, a history of performance issues or contract disputes could raise concerns about the reliability and effectiveness of the contractor.

What are the potential risks associated with a contract of this nature and duration?

Potential risks for a facilities operations support services contract include scope creep, where the services required expand beyond the original agreement, leading to cost overruns. Performance risks are also significant; failure to maintain facilities adequately can impact operational readiness and safety. Contractor viability is another risk, especially for longer-term contracts, as financial stability or operational capacity could change. Given the international location (Italy), geopolitical factors or logistical challenges could also pose risks. Furthermore, changes in government requirements or budget allocations could affect the contract's continuation or scope.

How does the NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) typically perform in terms of competition and pricing within the federal government?

NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services, is a broad category that generally sees a moderate to high level of competition within the federal government. Many companies, both large and small, offer these types of services. Contracts awarded under full and open competition for these services often result in competitive pricing due to the number of potential bidders. However, the intensity of competition can vary significantly based on the specific geographic location, the size and complexity of the facility, and the specific services required. Highly specialized or geographically remote support services might experience less competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: CENTRO DIREZIONALE ISOLA, NAPOLI

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N3319103D0203

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-30

Current End Date: 2008-03-30

Potential End Date: 2008-03-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2008-05-06

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending