DoD's $6.17M Administrative Services Contract Awarded to Fury Solutions LLC for Phillips Research Site

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,165,299 ($6.2M)

Contractor: Fury Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-12-01

End Date: 2026-12-01

Contract Duration: 1,096 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR PHILLIPS RESEARCH SITE

Place of Performance

Location: KIRTLAND AFB, BERNALILLO County, NEW MEXICO, 87117

State: New Mexico Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.2 million to FURY SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR PHILLIPS RESEARCH SITE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment for administrative support services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. Contract duration of three years allows for sustained support. 5. Performance is located in New Mexico, impacting local workforce. 6. No small business set-aside indicates a focus on larger prime contractors.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.17 million over three years for administrative services appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar government contracts for office administrative support. The firm-fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control. While specific performance metrics are not detailed here, the pricing is likely competitive given the full and open competition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple vendors were likely invited to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer. The exclusion of sources clause might suggest specific technical requirements or prior performance considerations.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging high-quality service delivery.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from essential administrative support for its Phillips Research Site operations. Services include office administrative support, crucial for the functioning of research facilities. The contract's geographic impact is primarily in New Mexico, potentially creating or sustaining local jobs. Workforce implications include opportunities for administrative professionals in the New Mexico region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess value for money beyond pricing.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation into potential limitations on competition.
No small business subcontracting plan is mentioned, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding environment.
The contract duration allows for stable and consistent administrative support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the administrative and support services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of business operations. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561110, Office Administrative Services, is a common category for government procurement. Spending in this area is consistent across many federal agencies requiring operational support.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of a specific small business subcontracting plan. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall offer, potentially from larger prime contractors. While this doesn't preclude subcontracting to small businesses, it doesn't actively prioritize it.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting agency, the Department of the Air Force, and potentially the Department of Defense's Inspector General if performance issues or fraud are suspected. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by fixing the cost, with oversight focusing on adherence to the statement of work and delivery timelines.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Administrative Support Contracts
Air Force Office Administrative Services
Federal Administrative Services Procurement
Research Site Support Services

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Lack of specified small business subcontracting goals.
Absence of detailed performance metrics in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.2 million to FURY SOLUTIONS LLC. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR PHILLIPS RESEARCH SITE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FURY SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-12-01. End: 2026-12-01.

What is the track record of Fury Solutions LLC in performing similar administrative services contracts for the federal government?

Information regarding Fury Solutions LLC's specific track record on similar administrative services contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous government engagements. Federal procurement databases and contractor performance systems (like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would be the primary sources for this information. Understanding their experience with the Department of Defense or similar research environments would be particularly relevant.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar administrative services in New Mexico?

Benchmarking the $6.17 million contract value against market rates for administrative services in New Mexico requires detailed analysis of labor costs, overhead, and profit margins typical for the region and the specific services required. Without a breakdown of the services and the labor mix, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the firm-fixed-price structure and full and open competition suggest the Department of the Air Force aimed for a competitive rate. Further analysis would involve comparing the estimated hours, skill levels, and service scope to commercial service providers in the Albuquerque metropolitan area, where Phillips Research Site is located.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will they be measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this administrative services contract. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to response times, accuracy of tasks, personnel availability, adherence to security protocols, and overall client satisfaction. The effectiveness of oversight and the assessment of value for money are heavily dependent on clearly defined and measurable KPIs. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would usually be responsible for monitoring performance against these metrics.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative services at the Phillips Research Site?

Historical spending data for administrative services specifically at the Phillips Research Site is not included in the provided contract details. To understand the historical spending pattern, one would need to examine previous contracts awarded for similar services at this location, potentially under different contracting vehicles or agencies. Analyzing trends in contract value, duration, and contractor performance over time would reveal whether this $6.17 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in administrative support for the site.

What specific administrative functions are covered under this contract?

The contract is categorized under NAICS code 561110, Office Administrative Services. This typically encompasses a range of functions such as general office management, record keeping, scheduling, correspondence management, basic financial administration (like invoice processing), human resources support, and potentially facility support services. The specific scope of work would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), outlining the precise duties, deliverables, and service levels expected from Fury Solutions LLC.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Office Administrative Services › Office Administrative Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1617 ASHMONT CT, XENIA, OH, 45385

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,841,893

Exercised Options: $8,149,796

Current Obligation: $6,165,299

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA945123DA001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline