DoD's $21.4M Contract for Health Practitioners Services: A Look at Competition and Value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,382,291 ($21.4M)
Contractor: Mindleaf Technologies Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-08-04
End Date: 2013-02-21
Contract Duration: 2,758 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Place of Performance
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, BERNALILLO County, NEW MEXICO, 87108
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.4 million to MINDLEAF TECHNOLOGIES INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract awarded to MINDLEAF TECHNOLOGIES INC. represents a significant investment in health practitioner services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust price discovery process. 3. The duration of the contract (2758 days) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The fixed-price nature of the contract aims to control costs for the government.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $21.4 million over approximately 7.5 years suggests an average annual spend of around $2.85 million. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for health practitioner services would be necessary to determine if this pricing is competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while competition was sought, specific sources were initially excluded. This method can sometimes limit the breadth of competition and potentially impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value. However, the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation to ensure maximum competition was achieved.
Public Impact
Ensures access to essential health practitioner services for military personnel and their families. Supports the Department of the Air Force's operational readiness by providing necessary medical support. The long-term nature of the contract provides stability for service providers and consistent care delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes value assessment difficult.
- Long contract duration may not reflect evolving healthcare needs.
Positive Signals
- Utilized full and open competition.
- Firm fixed-price contract type controls cost.
- Long-term award provides service continuity.
Sector Analysis
The healthcare sector, particularly services related to health practitioners, is a critical area for government spending. Benchmarks for similar contracts would typically consider the scope of services, geographic location, and provider qualifications.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's long duration and specific award method suggest a need for ongoing oversight to ensure compliance with terms and to monitor performance and cost-effectiveness throughout its life.
Related Government Programs
- Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown.
- Long contract duration may not reflect evolving needs.
- Absence of small business participation data.
- Unclear justification for source exclusion.
Tags
offices-of-all-other-miscellaneous-healt, department-of-defense, nm, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.4 million to MINDLEAF TECHNOLOGIES INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MINDLEAF TECHNOLOGIES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-08-04. End: 2013-02-21.
What was the rationale for excluding specific sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award?
The rationale for excluding specific sources typically relates to unique capabilities, past performance, or specific technical requirements that only certain vendors could meet. Understanding these specific criteria is crucial to determine if the exclusion was justified and if it unduly limited competition, potentially impacting the final price and overall value achieved for the taxpayer.
How does the per-unit cost of these health practitioner services compare to industry benchmarks or other government contracts?
Without specific per-unit cost data or a detailed breakdown of services rendered, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the total contract value of $21.4 million over nearly 8 years averages to approximately $2.85 million annually. This figure needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts for health practitioners within the DoD or other federal agencies to assess if the pricing is competitive and represents good value for the services provided.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of health practitioner services over the contract's long duration?
The effectiveness and quality are typically managed through performance metrics, service level agreements (SLAs), and regular performance reviews outlined in the contract. The Department of the Air Force would likely have quality assurance personnel monitoring the contractor's adherence to standards, patient outcomes, and overall service delivery to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the health practitioner services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Offices of Other Health Practitioners › Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › NURSING, NURSING HOME, EVAL/SCREEN
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 EXEC PARK, BURLINGTON, MA, 06
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-08-04
Current End Date: 2013-02-21
Potential End Date: 2013-02-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-02-26
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)