DoD's $23.8M Environmental Consulting Contract Awarded to SpecPro Professional Services, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,837,146 ($23.8M)
Contractor: Specpro Professional Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-02-03
End Date: 2019-04-05
Contract Duration: 791 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.1K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ADVISORY&ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMING AND EXECUTION SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78248
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.8 million to SPECPRO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ADVISORY&ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMING AND EXECUTION SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract value is $23.8 million, awarded to a single vendor. 2. The contract was not competed under SAP, raising questions about competition. 3. The service category is Environmental Consulting Services. 4. The contract duration was 791 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's firm fixed price structure suggests some price certainty. However, without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the price represents fair market value compared to similar environmental consulting services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not have yielded the best possible price or value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of robust competition could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these environmental consulting services.
Public Impact
Environmental consulting services are crucial for regulatory compliance and base operations. The award to a single vendor may limit opportunities for other qualified firms. Transparency in the procurement process is essential for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Lack of transparency in procurement
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services are vital for government agencies to manage environmental liabilities and comply with regulations. The benchmark for such services can vary widely based on scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were excluded from bidding opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation suggests a potential area for oversight to ensure proper justification for limited competition and adherence to procurement regulations.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Lack of small business participation
- Insufficient justification for non-competitive award
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, department-of-defense, tx, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.8 million to SPECPRO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC. IGF::CL::IGF BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ADVISORY&ASSISTANCE PROGRAMMING AND EXECUTION SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SPECPRO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-02-03. End: 2019-04-05.
What was the specific justification for not competing this contract under SAP?
The provided data does not specify the justification for not competing the contract under SAP. Typically, such decisions are based on factors like urgent needs, sole-source capabilities, or specific contract vehicles. A review of the contract file would be necessary to ascertain the exact reason and assess its validity.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar environmental consulting services?
Without specific details on the scope of work and the exact services rendered, a direct comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging. The 'br' (benchmark rate) of 30135 is provided, but its context and applicability to the entire contract value are unclear. A detailed analysis of the contract's deliverables against market rates would be required.
What is the potential impact of limited competition on the long-term cost-effectiveness of environmental consulting for the Air Force?
Limited competition can lead to higher prices and potentially less innovation over the long term, as the awarded contractor faces reduced pressure to offer competitive rates or superior service. This could result in increased costs for the Air Force and taxpayers for ongoing or future environmental consulting needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12500 SAN PEDRO AVE STE 632, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78216
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,837,746
Exercised Options: $23,837,746
Current Obligation: $23,837,146
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 13
Total Subaward Amount: $17,238,044
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-02-03
Current End Date: 2019-04-05
Potential End Date: 2019-04-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-02-05
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)