DoD awards $71M Engineering Services contract to Lockheed Martin for Air Force, sole-sourced

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $71,011,170 ($71.0M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-12-09

End Date: 2006-12-08

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $195.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: SUNNYVALE, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94086

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $71.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $71 million. 2. Sole-source award to a major defense contractor. 3. Potential for cost overruns with Cost Plus Award Fee structure. 4. Engineering services sector is critical for defense modernization.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which can lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the $71 million price is optimal.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for the government compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are used for this sole-source award, potentially at a premium due to the lack of competition.

Public Impact

Air Force receives critical engineering support. Taxpayers may bear higher costs due to sole-source nature. Limited transparency on cost-effectiveness without competition.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Award Fee contract type
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

  • Award to established contractor
  • Addresses critical Air Force needs

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is vital for the Department of Defense's research, development, and sustainment activities. Spending in this area is typically high due to the complexity of defense systems.

Small Business Impact

The awardee is Lockheed Martin Corporation, a large prime contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. Oversight should focus on the justification for not competing the contract.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competition.
  • Cost Plus Award Fee structure can inflate costs.
  • Potential for contractor to maximize profit over cost savings.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing justification.
  • Long-term reliance on a single provider.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, ca, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $71.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $71.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-09. End: 2006-12-08.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves specific circumstances such as the unique capability of the contractor, urgent need, or lack of adequate competition. Without further documentation, the specific rationale remains unclear, but it is a key area for oversight to ensure the government's interests were protected.

How does the Cost Plus Award Fee structure impact cost control for this contract?

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts allow the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a fee that is composed of a base fee and an award amount. While the award fee is intended to incentivize performance, it can also lead to higher overall costs if not carefully managed and monitored by the government. The lack of competition exacerbates this risk.

What is the long-term strategic value of this sole-source engineering support to the Air Force?

The long-term value depends on the criticality of the engineering services provided and whether Lockheed Martin possesses unique expertise essential for Air Force operations. If the services are mission-critical and no other vendor can provide them, the sole-source award might be strategically justified, though still subject to price scrutiny.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 1111 LOCKHEED MARTIN WAY, SUNNYVALE, CA, 17

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,475,173,326

Exercised Options: $2,283,760,047

Current Obligation: $71,011,170

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-12-09

Current End Date: 2006-12-08

Potential End Date: 2009-06-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-07-14

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation

View all Lockheed Martin Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending