DoD's $1.6B National Security Space Launch contract awarded to SpaceX for launch services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $160,716,179 ($160.7M)
Contractor: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-08-19
End Date: 2023-08-18
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $441.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PHASE 2 LAUNCH SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: HAWTHORNE, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90250
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $160.7 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. for work described as: NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PHASE 2 LAUNCH SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single provider, raising questions about competition and potential price impacts. 2. The contract's duration of one year suggests a focus on immediate launch needs rather than long-term strategic planning. 3. Fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the government, shifting performance risk to the contractor. 4. The specific launch services are critical for national security space missions, indicating high strategic importance. 5. Awarded by the Department of the Air Force, this contract aligns with broader defense space initiatives.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to similar launch service contracts. The raw dollar amount of $1.6 billion is substantial, but its value is contingent on the number and complexity of launches performed. Given the fixed-price nature, the government aims for cost certainty, but the absence of competitive bids for this specific award limits direct price comparison and assessment of optimal value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were eligible to bid. However, the data provided does not specify the number of bids received or the evaluation process. A full and open competition is generally expected to foster price discovery and encourage competitive pricing among bidders, potentially leading to better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, in principle, should lead to more competitive pricing, benefiting taxpayers by ensuring the government is not overpaying for essential launch services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are national security space programs, ensuring the deployment of critical assets. Services delivered include launch operations for satellites and other space-based payloads. The geographic impact is primarily national, supporting U.S. defense objectives, with launches originating from designated spaceports. Workforce implications include specialized roles in aerospace engineering, launch operations, and mission control.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of transparency on the number of bids received under full and open competition.
- Potential for price escalation in future contracts if competition is not sustained.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical launch services could pose supply chain risks.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a structured procurement process.
- Fixed-price contract type provides budget predictability for the government.
- Contractor's established track record in space launch operations.
Sector Analysis
The National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program is a critical component of the U.S. space industrial base, ensuring reliable access to space for national security missions. This sector is characterized by high barriers to entry, significant technological complexity, and substantial government investment. Spending in this area is driven by the need to deploy and maintain advanced satellite constellations for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and communication. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the unique nature of launch services and the limited number of qualified providers.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Given the specialized nature of space launch services, it is common for prime contracts to be awarded to large, established aerospace companies. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved in the supply chain or as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified launch services. Transparency may be limited due to the sensitive nature of national security space missions, but standard government procurement regulations and reporting requirements would apply. Inspector General jurisdiction would cover potential fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- National Security Space Launch (NSSL) Program
- Space Force Launch Services
- Commercial Satellite Launch Contracts
- Department of Defense Space Procurement
Risk Flags
- Potential for single-source dependency if competition dwindles in future phases.
- National security implications of launch failures or delays.
- Long-term cost-effectiveness requires ongoing market analysis.
Tags
defense, space-launch-services, national-security, department-of-defense, air-force, california, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, large-contract, aerospace, space-exploration-technologies-corp
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $160.7 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PHASE 2 LAUNCH SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $160.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-08-19. End: 2023-08-18.
What is the historical spending trend for National Security Space Launch services by the Department of Defense?
Historical spending on National Security Space Launch (NSSL) services by the Department of Defense (DoD) has been substantial, reflecting the critical need for reliable access to space for national security missions. The NSSL program, in its various phases, has seen significant investment over the years. For instance, prior phases of NSSL have involved contracts worth billions of dollars awarded to multiple providers to ensure redundancy and competition. The transition to NSSL Phase 2, which includes this contract with SpaceX, represents a continuation of this strategic investment. Analyzing year-over-year spending reveals a consistent commitment to maintaining and enhancing U.S. space capabilities, with fluctuations often tied to specific mission requirements, technological advancements, and the evolving threat landscape. The total obligated amounts and contract actions within the NSSL program underscore its importance as a major defense expenditure.
How does the awarded price compare to similar launch service contracts in the market?
Directly comparing the awarded price of $1.6 billion for this specific National Security Space Launch (NSSL) Phase 2 contract to similar launch service contracts is complex due to several factors. Firstly, the 'price' often represents the total value of a delivery order or contract, encompassing multiple launches and associated services over a defined period, rather than a per-launch cost. Secondly, the nature of NSSL contracts involves highly specialized, often classified, national security payloads, which command different pricing structures than commercial launches. SpaceX, as a provider, has demonstrated competitive pricing in the commercial market, but NSSL contracts may include additional requirements related to security, reliability, and specific launch windows that influence cost. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing the cost per kilogram to orbit or per launch for similar national security missions, considering the specific launch vehicle, mission complexity, and provider. Without detailed, comparable contract data, a precise value-for-money assessment against market rates remains challenging.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and success metrics for this contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) and success metrics for this National Security Space Launch (NSSL) Phase 2 contract are primarily centered around the successful and timely execution of launch missions. These would include metrics such as launch success rate (achieving intended orbit), adherence to launch schedules and windows, payload integration success, and mission completion according to specified requirements. For a fixed-price contract, meeting these performance obligations without cost overruns is a critical success factor for the contractor. The government's success metrics would focus on the reliable delivery of national security space capabilities enabled by these launches. While specific KPIs are often sensitive due to national security implications, they fundamentally revolve around mission assurance, operational readiness, and the effective deployment of critical space assets.
What is SpaceX's track record with government launch contracts, particularly for national security missions?
SpaceX has a significant and growing track record with government launch contracts, including a substantial presence in national security missions. Initially facing challenges in gaining access to this market, SpaceX has since become a key provider. They have successfully executed numerous launches for NASA, including cargo and crew missions to the International Space Station. For national security missions, SpaceX has been awarded contracts under the NSSL program, demonstrating their capability to meet stringent requirements. Their Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles have proven reliable, and the company has consistently met or exceeded performance expectations in terms of launch success rates and adherence to schedules. This established performance history is a critical factor underpinning their continued selection for high-value government contracts, including this $1.6 billion NSSL Phase 2 award.
Are there any identified risks associated with relying on a single provider for these critical launch services?
Yes, there are identified risks associated with relying on a single provider, even within a competitive procurement process like full and open competition, especially if only one bid is deemed acceptable or if subsequent awards consolidate services. Key risks include supply chain vulnerabilities, where disruptions affecting the sole provider (e.g., manufacturing issues, accidents, or geopolitical factors) could halt all national security launches. There's also the risk of reduced price competition in future procurements if the incumbent provider faces less pressure. Furthermore, a single provider might lack the incentive to innovate as aggressively as in a multi-provider environment. To mitigate these risks, the government often employs strategies such as maintaining robust government-furnished information, fostering alternative capabilities where feasible, and structuring contracts to incentivize performance and mitigate contractor-specific risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Nonscheduled Air Transportation › Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › TRANSPORTATION OF THINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 ROCKET RD, HAWTHORNE, CA, 90250
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $160,716,179
Exercised Options: $160,716,179
Current Obligation: $160,716,179
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA881120D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-08-19
Current End Date: 2023-08-18
Potential End Date: 2023-08-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-07-14
More Contracts from Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
- THE Commercial Crew Program (CCP) Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (cctcap) Contract Will Provide Completion of the Design, Development, Test, Evaluation, and Certification of an Integrated Crew Transportation System (CTS) Capable of Transporting Nasa Crew to and From the ISS, in Accordance With the Design Reference Missions and Nasa's Certification Standards and Requirements. Certification of the CTS Will BE Determined by Nasa. Nasa Plans to Issue Task Orders for Post Certification Missions (PCM) to and From ISS That Include Ground, Launch, Lifeboat, On-Orbit, Return and Recovery Operations. the Minimum Quantity of Missions to BE Ordered IS TWO (2) and the Maximum Potential Quantity of Missions Which MAY BE Ordered IS SIX (6). in Addition, Nasa MAY Issue Task Orders for Special Studies Used for Risk Reduction and Other Purposes Related to the CTS. Nasa Certification Under Clin 001 IS Complete When the Contractor's Crew Transportation System (CTS) HAS MET Nasa's Requirements for Safely Transporting Crew to and From the International Space Station (ISS) in Accordance With Documents Identified in Section C.1, Specifications/Statement of Work. Subclins 001A and 001B, Identified in Table B.3,Ddte/Certification Subclins, ARE Delivery Milestones That Represent Completion of Required Work Necessary to Achieve Nasa Certification. Delivery Payment for the ISS Design Certification Review (DCR) for the Crewed Flight to the ISS Includes ALL Work Under This Clin That Occurs From the Contract Effective Date Through the ISS DCR Completion. the Delivery Payment for the Certification Review (CR) Will Include ALL Work That Occurs From the ISS DCR Delivery Date Through the END of the Ddte/Certification Clin 001. in Accordance With Clause C.1, Specification/Statement of Work, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contracting Officer MAY Issue Post Certification Mission (PCM) Task Orders. the Contractor Shall USE the Mission Pricing Rates Shown in Table B.4.1, Post Certification Mission Prices. the PER Mission Prices ARE for a Single Order AT the Price Stated PER the Calendar Year (CY) Based on the Number of Missions Ordered. CTS Full Mission Capability Prices Shall BE Based on (1) Fulfillment of the Design Reference Mission to the ISS Found in Cct-Drm-1110, Crew Transportation System Design Reference Missions, Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract and (2) ALL Inherent CTS Capabilities That ARE Within the Proposed Mission Prices. in Accordance With Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contractor Shall Perform Special Studies, Test and Analyses, AS Initiated by Written Direction From the Contracting Officer. Spacex Cctcap Post Certification Missions 3-6(PCM-3-6) Task Order Against Nnk14ma74c Clin 002, AS Described in Clause B.4 Post Certification Missions (idiq)(clin 002) and ALL Other Applicable Terms and Conditions — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Work Required for the Design, Development, Manufacture, Test, Launch, Demonstration, and Engineering Support of the Human Landing System (HLS) Integrated Lander — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Design, Develop, Manufacture, Test, Integrate, Achieve Nasa Acceptance, Deliver, and Sustain ITS United States Deorbit Vehicle (usdv) Such That the Usdv CAN Perform the Final Deorbit of the International Space Station (ISS) — $425.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 1A-6 Launch Services — $313.8M (Department of Defense)
- National Security Space Launch Phase 3 Lane 1 — $307.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Space Exploration Technologies Corp. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)