Space Force awards $183M for launch services to SpaceX, highlighting strong competition and delivery order execution
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $183,179,377 ($183.2M)
Contractor: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-08-18
End Date: 2023-03-10
Contract Duration: 934 days
Daily Burn Rate: $196.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE 67 LAUNCH SERVICE
Place of Performance
Location: HAWTHORNE, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90250
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $183.2 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. for work described as: UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE 67 LAUNCH SERVICE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in national security space capabilities. 2. The award to SpaceX indicates a dynamic market with established players. 3. Delivery order structure suggests a need for agile and responsive launch solutions. 4. Performance period spans over two years, indicating ongoing program requirements. 5. The contract falls within the broader defense sector's increasing reliance on commercial space capabilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $183.2 million for launch services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale launch contracts is challenging due to the specialized nature of space missions. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the government has locked in costs, providing cost certainty. The award to a single, highly capable provider like SpaceX, while potentially limiting immediate price comparison, reflects the mature capabilities required for such missions.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the fact that it was competed openly suggests a healthy level of market interest and capability. This competitive process is designed to ensure the government receives the best value and pricing available.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and encouraging innovation among potential bidders.
Public Impact
The United States Space Force benefits from reliable and timely launch services for national security assets. This contract supports the delivery of critical space-based capabilities, enhancing national defense. The services are primarily delivered within the United States, supporting domestic launch infrastructure. The contract supports a highly specialized workforce in the aerospace and launch services industry.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen technical challenges arise during launch campaigns.
- Dependence on a single provider for critical launch services could pose a risk if that provider faces operational issues.
- The long performance period might not fully capture the rapid evolution of launch technologies, potentially leading to suboptimal solutions over time.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- SpaceX is a proven provider of launch services, indicating a lower risk of technical failure.
- The contract duration aligns with the expected lifecycle of certain national security space missions.
Sector Analysis
The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by high barriers to entry, significant R&D investment, and stringent regulatory requirements. This contract for launch services fits within the national security segment of the space industry, which is increasingly relying on commercial providers for cost-effective and agile solutions. The market for launch services is competitive, with a few key players capable of meeting the demanding requirements of government missions. Spending in this area is driven by the need to maintain space superiority and deploy critical assets.
Small Business Impact
While this contract was awarded to a large prime contractor, it's important to assess subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. Large aerospace contracts often involve complex supply chains where small businesses can play a vital role in providing specialized components or services. Without specific set-aside information, it's assumed that standard subcontracting plans would be in place to ensure small business participation, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem within the defense industrial base.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the Department of the Air Force, acting on behalf of the Space Force. Mechanisms would include regular performance reviews, milestone tracking, and financial audits to ensure compliance with contract terms and conditions. Transparency is typically maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- National Security Space Launch (NSSL)
- Space Systems Command Contracts
- Commercial Satellite Launch Services
- Department of Defense Space Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for launch delays impacting national security timelines.
- Dependence on a single, albeit highly capable, launch provider.
- Complexity of space launch operations introduces inherent technical risks.
Tags
space-force, department-of-defense, space-exploration-technologies-corp, spacex, launch-services, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, national-security, aerospace, california, defense-sector
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $183.2 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.. UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE 67 LAUNCH SERVICE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $183.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-08-18. End: 2023-03-10.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar launch services by the Space Force or Department of Defense?
Historical spending on launch services by the Space Force and its predecessor, the Air Force, has been substantial, often managed under large umbrella programs like the National Security Space Launch (NSSL). These programs have historically involved multiple providers, though the market has consolidated. For instance, prior NSSL contracts have seen significant multi-billion dollar awards over several years. The current award of $183.2 million to SpaceX represents a specific delivery order within a broader framework, likely reflecting the cost of individual or a series of launches. Analyzing past awards reveals a trend towards leveraging commercial capabilities to reduce costs compared to purely government-developed systems, while still maintaining rigorous performance and security standards.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to other launch service providers for comparable missions?
Directly comparing the pricing of this $183.2 million contract to other launch service providers for comparable missions is complex without detailed cost breakdowns and specific mission parameters. However, SpaceX has generally been recognized for offering competitive pricing in the launch services market, often attributed to their reusable rocket technology and streamlined manufacturing processes. The fact that this contract was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the government sought the best value. While specific per-launch costs are not public, industry analyses often place SpaceX's pricing favorably against traditional providers for similar payload classes and orbital destinations, especially when considering the total mission cost over time.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and success metrics for this launch service contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for a launch service contract of this nature typically revolve around mission success, schedule adherence, and cost control. Mission success would include achieving the intended orbit, successful payload deployment, and overall vehicle performance. Schedule adherence would focus on meeting launch windows and delivery timelines. Cost control, especially under a firm-fixed-price contract, means staying within the awarded amount. Additional metrics might include safety performance, reliability of launch systems, and compliance with environmental regulations. The Space Force would monitor these KPIs through regular reporting from the contractor and potentially independent verification.
What is the track record of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in fulfilling government launch contracts?
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) has a well-established and strong track record in fulfilling government launch contracts. They have successfully executed numerous missions for NASA, including cargo and crew resupply to the International Space Station, as well as various scientific and national security payloads for the Department of Defense and the Space Force. SpaceX's Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets have demonstrated high reliability and mission success rates. Their ability to consistently meet launch schedules and deliver payloads to specified orbits has made them a key player in the government launch services market, underpinning their selection for significant contracts like this one.
Are there any identified risks associated with the contractor or the nature of the services provided?
While SpaceX has a strong track record, potential risks associated with any launch service contract include technical failures during launch, schedule delays due to technical or range availability issues, and geopolitical factors impacting launch operations or supply chains. For this specific contract, the risk is mitigated by SpaceX's proven technology and operational experience. However, the inherent complexity and high-stakes nature of space launches mean that unforeseen issues can always arise. The government's oversight, including performance monitoring and contingency planning, aims to manage these risks effectively. The reliance on a single provider for a specific set of launches also presents a concentration risk.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Nonscheduled Air Transportation › Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › TRANSPORTATION OF THINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 ROCKET RD, HAWTHORNE, CA, 90250
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $183,179,377
Exercised Options: $183,179,377
Current Obligation: $183,179,377
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA881120D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-08-18
Current End Date: 2023-03-10
Potential End Date: 2023-03-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-02-16
More Contracts from Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
- THE Commercial Crew Program (CCP) Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (cctcap) Contract Will Provide Completion of the Design, Development, Test, Evaluation, and Certification of an Integrated Crew Transportation System (CTS) Capable of Transporting Nasa Crew to and From the ISS, in Accordance With the Design Reference Missions and Nasa's Certification Standards and Requirements. Certification of the CTS Will BE Determined by Nasa. Nasa Plans to Issue Task Orders for Post Certification Missions (PCM) to and From ISS That Include Ground, Launch, Lifeboat, On-Orbit, Return and Recovery Operations. the Minimum Quantity of Missions to BE Ordered IS TWO (2) and the Maximum Potential Quantity of Missions Which MAY BE Ordered IS SIX (6). in Addition, Nasa MAY Issue Task Orders for Special Studies Used for Risk Reduction and Other Purposes Related to the CTS. Nasa Certification Under Clin 001 IS Complete When the Contractor's Crew Transportation System (CTS) HAS MET Nasa's Requirements for Safely Transporting Crew to and From the International Space Station (ISS) in Accordance With Documents Identified in Section C.1, Specifications/Statement of Work. Subclins 001A and 001B, Identified in Table B.3,Ddte/Certification Subclins, ARE Delivery Milestones That Represent Completion of Required Work Necessary to Achieve Nasa Certification. Delivery Payment for the ISS Design Certification Review (DCR) for the Crewed Flight to the ISS Includes ALL Work Under This Clin That Occurs From the Contract Effective Date Through the ISS DCR Completion. the Delivery Payment for the Certification Review (CR) Will Include ALL Work That Occurs From the ISS DCR Delivery Date Through the END of the Ddte/Certification Clin 001. in Accordance With Clause C.1, Specification/Statement of Work, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contracting Officer MAY Issue Post Certification Mission (PCM) Task Orders. the Contractor Shall USE the Mission Pricing Rates Shown in Table B.4.1, Post Certification Mission Prices. the PER Mission Prices ARE for a Single Order AT the Price Stated PER the Calendar Year (CY) Based on the Number of Missions Ordered. CTS Full Mission Capability Prices Shall BE Based on (1) Fulfillment of the Design Reference Mission to the ISS Found in Cct-Drm-1110, Crew Transportation System Design Reference Missions, Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract and (2) ALL Inherent CTS Capabilities That ARE Within the Proposed Mission Prices. in Accordance With Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contractor Shall Perform Special Studies, Test and Analyses, AS Initiated by Written Direction From the Contracting Officer. Spacex Cctcap Post Certification Missions 3-6(PCM-3-6) Task Order Against Nnk14ma74c Clin 002, AS Described in Clause B.4 Post Certification Missions (idiq)(clin 002) and ALL Other Applicable Terms and Conditions — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Work Required for the Design, Development, Manufacture, Test, Launch, Demonstration, and Engineering Support of the Human Landing System (HLS) Integrated Lander — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Design, Develop, Manufacture, Test, Integrate, Achieve Nasa Acceptance, Deliver, and Sustain ITS United States Deorbit Vehicle (usdv) Such That the Usdv CAN Perform the Final Deorbit of the International Space Station (ISS) — $425.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 1A-6 Launch Services — $313.8M (Department of Defense)
- National Security Space Launch Phase 3 Lane 1 — $307.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Space Exploration Technologies Corp. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)