DoD's $16M R&D contract for space systems support awarded to Tecolote Research, Inc. shows fair value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,009,933 ($16.0M)
Contractor: Tecolote Research, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-08-10
End Date: 2020-02-12
Contract Duration: 551 days
Daily Burn Rate: $29.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER ACQUISITION FINANCIAL SUPPORT TEMPORARY TASK ORDER.
Place of Performance
Location: GOLETA, SANTA BARBARA County, CALIFORNIA, 93117
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.0 million to TECOLOTE RESEARCH, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER ACQUISITION FINANCIAL SUPPORT TEMPORARY TASK ORDER. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. The contract's duration of 551 days for R&D services appears reasonable. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Performance occurred primarily in California, indicating a regional economic impact. 5. The contract falls under R&D in physical, engineering, and life sciences, a critical sector for defense. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, which is typical for specialized R&D contracts.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of approximately $16 million for 551 days of R&D support appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized technical services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for space systems acquisition support is challenging without more granular data on the specific tasks performed. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government secured a defined scope of work at a predetermined cost, which is generally a positive indicator of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' While the 'exclusion of sources' phrasing might initially raise questions, it typically refers to a scenario where specific sources were excluded based on pre-defined criteria (e.g., security clearances, specific technical capabilities) before the broader competition was opened. The fact that it was 'full and open' implies that multiple qualified offerors had the opportunity to bid, leading to a competitive process that should drive price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award suggests that taxpayers benefited from a process designed to solicit the best value from a range of qualified contractors, rather than being limited to a single provider.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Air Force, receiving critical research and development support for space and missile systems. Services delivered include specialized technical and analytical support essential for the acquisition and development of advanced space technologies. The contract's geographic impact is concentrated in California, where the contractor is located and likely performed the work. The contract supports highly skilled technical and scientific jobs within the aerospace and defense R&D sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'exclusion of sources' clause, while potentially legitimate, warrants understanding the specific criteria used to exclude potential bidders to ensure fairness.
- Lack of specific performance metrics or outcome data makes it difficult to fully assess the effectiveness and impact of the R&D services provided.
Positive Signals
- The use of a firm fixed-price contract type is a positive signal, indicating cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- The contractor, Tecolote Research, Inc., likely possesses specialized expertise required for complex space and missile systems R&D.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector, specifically focusing on space and missile systems. This is a highly specialized and critical area for national defense, often characterized by long development cycles and significant technological innovation. The market for such services is typically dominated by a few highly capable firms with the necessary security clearances and technical expertise. Spending in this sector is driven by evolving threats, technological advancements, and strategic national priorities.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). This is common for highly specialized R&D contracts requiring advanced technical capabilities and security clearances that may not be readily available within the small business sector. Consequently, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from this specific award, nor is there an immediate impact on the small business ecosystem through this particular contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Air Force. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by locking in costs. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Space Systems Command Contracts
- Missile Defense Agency Contracts
- Department of Defense Research and Development Programs
- Aerospace Engineering Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential lack of transparency in source exclusion criteria.
- Limited public data on specific R&D outcomes and effectiveness.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, research-and-development, space-and-missile-systems, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, california, tecote-research-inc, acquisition-support, technology-development
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.0 million to TECOLOTE RESEARCH, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER ACQUISITION FINANCIAL SUPPORT TEMPORARY TASK ORDER.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TECOLOTE RESEARCH, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-08-10. End: 2020-02-12.
What specific R&D activities were performed under this contract?
The contract, "IGF::OT::IGF SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER ACQUISITION FINANCIAL SUPPORT TEMPORARY TASK ORDER," suggests the work involved financial support and temporary task orders related to the acquisition of space and missile systems. While the specific R&D activities are not detailed in the provided data, they likely encompassed areas such as systems engineering, technical analysis, cost estimation, program management support, and potentially research into new technologies or methodologies for space and missile system development. The NAICS code 541712, 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology),' further indicates a focus on scientific and technical research rather than direct manufacturing or procurement of hardware.
How does the $16 million contract value compare to similar R&D contracts for space systems support?
Comparing the $16 million value requires context on the scope and duration of similar contracts. For specialized R&D support in the space and missile systems domain, $16 million over approximately 1.5 years (551 days) is a moderate-sized contract. Larger, multi-year programs involving extensive system development or testing could easily reach hundreds of millions or billions. Conversely, smaller, highly focused research tasks might be in the low millions. Tecolote Research, Inc. is known for providing advanced technical services, and this contract appears to align with their capabilities for supporting complex acquisition programs. Without specific details on the deliverables, a precise benchmark is difficult, but the value seems commensurate with specialized technical support for a significant defense acquisition effort.
What are the key risks associated with this type of R&D contract, and how were they mitigated?
Key risks for R&D contracts include technical feasibility (will the research yield desired results), schedule delays (research can be unpredictable), cost overruns (especially in fixed-price contracts if scope is not well-defined), and contractor performance. This contract utilized a 'firm fixed-price' (pt: FIRM FIXED PRICE) type, which is a primary mitigation strategy against cost overruns, as the contractor assumes the risk of exceeding the agreed-upon price. The 'full and open competition' (ct: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES) likely helped select a contractor with a proven track record and competitive pricing. The contract duration of 551 days (dur: 551) provides a defined timeframe, and the agency's oversight would further monitor progress and address potential issues.
What is Tecolote Research, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in space and missile systems R&D?
Tecolote Research, Inc. is a well-established contractor specializing in advanced technical services, including systems engineering, analysis, and program support, particularly for defense and aerospace clients. Their work often involves complex projects for agencies like the Department of Defense (DoD) and NASA. While this specific contract was for acquisition financial support and temporary task orders, the company's general expertise aligns with the R&D needs in space and missile systems. Their history with the DoD likely includes numerous contracts supporting various weapon system development and acquisition programs, indicating a significant level of experience and trust within the agency for handling sensitive and technically demanding projects.
How does the spending on this contract compare to overall federal spending in the R&D sector for space and missile systems?
The $16 million awarded to Tecolote Research, Inc. represents a small fraction of the overall federal spending on R&D, particularly within the defense sector's space and missile systems domain. The Department of Defense alone invests tens of billions of dollars annually in research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E). Contracts for space and missile systems R&D can range from tens of millions for specific technology development efforts to billions for major program development and sustainment. Therefore, while significant for the contractor and the specific task order, this $16 million contract is a component within a much larger federal R&D investment landscape aimed at maintaining technological superiority.
What does the 'exclusion of sources' clause imply for the competition level and potential fairness?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' clause suggests that while the competition was broadly open to all qualified bidders, certain pre-defined criteria were used to exclude specific entities before the main solicitation. These exclusions are typically based on factors like security clearances, specific technical expertise, past performance issues, or proprietary information requirements. The intent is often to ensure that only capable and appropriate contractors participate, thereby streamlining the process and potentially leading to better-suited solutions. However, the transparency and justification for these exclusions are critical to ensure the process remains fair and does not unduly limit competition. Without knowing the specific exclusion criteria, it's difficult to definitively assess its impact beyond ensuring a baseline level of qualification.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: FA881118R0003
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 420 S FAIRVIEW AVE STE 201, GOLETA, CA, 93117
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,041,652
Exercised Options: $16,009,933
Current Obligation: $16,009,933
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 168
Total Subaward Amount: $165,878,033
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADS619
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-08-10
Current End Date: 2020-02-12
Potential End Date: 2020-02-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-22
More Contracts from Tecolote Research, Inc.
- Acquisition and Financial Support Follow-On — $138.4M (Department of Defense)
- Software Development and Operations Environment — $101.9M (Department of Defense)
- Space and Missiles Systems Center Acquisition and Financial Services Follow-On (safs II) — $83.1M (Department of Defense)
- Cost and Software Data Reporting (csdr) — $80.7M (Department of Defense)
- Cade Support Igf::ot::igf — $72.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)