Air Force awards $152.7M for space launch services to SpaceX, highlighting a competitive market
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $152,726,072 ($152.7M)
Contractor: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-06-20
End Date: 2024-02-05
Contract Duration: 2,056 days
Daily Burn Rate: $74.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND-52 LAUNCH SERVICES.
Place of Performance
Location: HAWTHORNE, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90250
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $152.7 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. for work described as: AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND-52 LAUNCH SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, highly capable provider, indicating specialized service needs. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 3. Long duration of the contract (2056) implies a strategic, long-term requirement. 4. Awarded by the Department of the Air Force, a major consumer of space services. 5. Significant value suggests a critical role in national security or space exploration objectives. 6. Competition level indicates a mature market for launch services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $152.7 million for space launch services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work and the long performance period. Benchmarking against similar large-scale launch contracts is challenging due to unique mission requirements and technological advancements. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty. The award to SpaceX, a known leader in this field, suggests a competitive bid process likely resulted in a fair market price for these critical services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors were solicited. The presence of two bids suggests a healthy level of competition for these high-value space launch services. This competitive environment is crucial for ensuring the government receives the best possible pricing and service offerings.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and encouraging innovation among providers.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force and potentially other government agencies requiring space launch capabilities. Services delivered include the launch of satellites and other payloads into orbit. Geographic impact is national, supporting critical defense and intelligence missions. Workforce implications include highly skilled jobs in aerospace engineering, launch operations, and support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
- Reliance on a single provider for a critical service introduces supply chain risk.
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen technical challenges arise, despite fixed-price terms.
Positive Signals
- Award to a proven provider like SpaceX suggests high likelihood of successful mission execution.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides strong cost control and predictability.
- Long-term nature of the contract allows for strategic planning and resource allocation.
Sector Analysis
The space launch services sector is a critical component of national security and commercial space endeavors. It is characterized by high barriers to entry due to technological complexity and significant capital investment. Major players include established aerospace companies and newer, innovative firms. Spending in this sector is driven by government requirements for satellite deployment, scientific missions, and national defense.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as it was awarded to a large, established aerospace corporation. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but are not explicitly detailed in the provided data. The primary focus is on securing launch services from a capable prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense and the Department of the Air Force have robust oversight mechanisms for major contracts, including regular performance reviews, financial audits, and compliance checks. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract inherently provides a level of accountability for cost control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements.
Related Government Programs
- National Security Space Launch (NSSL)
- Space Force Launch Services
- Satellite Deployment Contracts
- Aerospace Technology Development
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may present future flexibility challenges.
- Dependence on a single provider for critical launches carries inherent risk.
- Potential for cost escalation if scope changes significantly.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, space-launch-services, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, california, large-contract, aerospace, national-security
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $152.7 million to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.. AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND-52 LAUNCH SERVICES.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $152.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-06-20. End: 2024-02-05.
What is the historical spending trend for space launch services by the Department of the Air Force?
Historical spending on space launch services by the Department of the Air Force has seen significant fluctuations, often driven by the cadence of satellite constellations and evolving technological requirements. Prior to the current era of increased commercial launch competition, the Air Force relied heavily on a few established providers, leading to higher per-launch costs. The emergence of companies like SpaceX has introduced greater competition and potentially driven down costs for similar services. Analyzing spending over the last decade would reveal a shift towards more flexible, commercially-oriented contracts, reflecting a strategic move to leverage private sector innovation and capacity. This particular contract, valued at over $150 million, represents a substantial investment, underscoring the ongoing importance of reliable launch capabilities for national security and operational needs.
How does the per-unit cost of this contract compare to similar space launch services?
Determining a precise per-unit cost for this contract is complex as the $152.7 million value likely encompasses multiple launches or a service package rather than a single unit. However, comparing it to industry benchmarks requires understanding the specific payload mass, orbital destination, and launch vehicle used. Historically, government launch costs have been high, but the increasing competition from commercial providers like SpaceX has driven down prices significantly. If this contract covers multiple launches, the average cost per launch could be competitive with or even lower than previous government contracts. Without knowing the exact number and type of launches included, a direct per-unit comparison is difficult, but the award to a competitive provider suggests an effort to achieve cost-effectiveness.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this space launch services contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for this space launch services contract would likely focus on mission success, schedule adherence, and cost control. Mission success is paramount, ensuring payloads reach their intended orbits safely and without damage. Schedule adherence is critical, as launch windows are often precise and delays can have cascading effects on subsequent operations or satellite deployment timelines. For a firm fixed-price contract, cost control is managed through the contractor's adherence to the agreed-upon budget. Additional KPIs might include safety performance during launch operations, compliance with environmental regulations, and successful integration of payloads. The long duration of the contract suggests that ongoing performance monitoring and reporting would be integral to its management.
What is SpaceX's track record with Department of Defense launch contracts?
SpaceX has a strong and growing track record with Department of Defense (DoD) launch contracts. Initially facing skepticism, the company has successfully executed numerous missions for various branches of the military, including the Air Force and now the Space Force. Their ability to provide reliable launches at competitive prices has made them a significant player in the DoD's launch portfolio. Key successes include launching national security payloads, demonstrating reliability and cost-effectiveness compared to legacy providers. This contract award is a continuation of the DoD's increasing reliance on SpaceX for critical space access, reflecting confidence in their capabilities and performance history.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source or limited competition award for space launch services?
While this contract was awarded under full and open competition, understanding risks associated with limited competition is relevant. In sole-source or limited competition scenarios for space launch services, the primary risks include higher costs due to lack of competitive pressure, reduced incentive for innovation, and potential for vendor lock-in. Taxpayers could face inflated prices if the chosen contractor does not face market-driven cost controls. Furthermore, a limited pool of providers might restrict options if unforeseen technical issues or capacity constraints arise with the incumbent. This underscores the importance of robust market research and competitive solicitations whenever feasible to ensure the best value for the government.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Nonscheduled Air Transportation › Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › TRANSPORTATION OF THINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 ROCKET RD, HAWTHORNE, CA, 90250
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $152,726,072
Exercised Options: $152,726,072
Current Obligation: $152,726,072
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-06-20
Current End Date: 2024-02-05
Potential End Date: 2024-02-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-02-06
More Contracts from Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
- THE Commercial Crew Program (CCP) Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (cctcap) Contract Will Provide Completion of the Design, Development, Test, Evaluation, and Certification of an Integrated Crew Transportation System (CTS) Capable of Transporting Nasa Crew to and From the ISS, in Accordance With the Design Reference Missions and Nasa's Certification Standards and Requirements. Certification of the CTS Will BE Determined by Nasa. Nasa Plans to Issue Task Orders for Post Certification Missions (PCM) to and From ISS That Include Ground, Launch, Lifeboat, On-Orbit, Return and Recovery Operations. the Minimum Quantity of Missions to BE Ordered IS TWO (2) and the Maximum Potential Quantity of Missions Which MAY BE Ordered IS SIX (6). in Addition, Nasa MAY Issue Task Orders for Special Studies Used for Risk Reduction and Other Purposes Related to the CTS. Nasa Certification Under Clin 001 IS Complete When the Contractor's Crew Transportation System (CTS) HAS MET Nasa's Requirements for Safely Transporting Crew to and From the International Space Station (ISS) in Accordance With Documents Identified in Section C.1, Specifications/Statement of Work. Subclins 001A and 001B, Identified in Table B.3,Ddte/Certification Subclins, ARE Delivery Milestones That Represent Completion of Required Work Necessary to Achieve Nasa Certification. Delivery Payment for the ISS Design Certification Review (DCR) for the Crewed Flight to the ISS Includes ALL Work Under This Clin That Occurs From the Contract Effective Date Through the ISS DCR Completion. the Delivery Payment for the Certification Review (CR) Will Include ALL Work That Occurs From the ISS DCR Delivery Date Through the END of the Ddte/Certification Clin 001. in Accordance With Clause C.1, Specification/Statement of Work, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contracting Officer MAY Issue Post Certification Mission (PCM) Task Orders. the Contractor Shall USE the Mission Pricing Rates Shown in Table B.4.1, Post Certification Mission Prices. the PER Mission Prices ARE for a Single Order AT the Price Stated PER the Calendar Year (CY) Based on the Number of Missions Ordered. CTS Full Mission Capability Prices Shall BE Based on (1) Fulfillment of the Design Reference Mission to the ISS Found in Cct-Drm-1110, Crew Transportation System Design Reference Missions, Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract and (2) ALL Inherent CTS Capabilities That ARE Within the Proposed Mission Prices. in Accordance With Attachment J-03, Contract Performance Work Statement, the Task Ordering Procedures and Other Terms and Conditions in the Contract, the Contractor Shall Perform Special Studies, Test and Analyses, AS Initiated by Written Direction From the Contracting Officer. Spacex Cctcap Post Certification Missions 3-6(PCM-3-6) Task Order Against Nnk14ma74c Clin 002, AS Described in Clause B.4 Post Certification Missions (idiq)(clin 002) and ALL Other Applicable Terms and Conditions — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Work Required for the Design, Development, Manufacture, Test, Launch, Demonstration, and Engineering Support of the Human Landing System (HLS) Integrated Lander — $3.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Design, Develop, Manufacture, Test, Integrate, Achieve Nasa Acceptance, Deliver, and Sustain ITS United States Deorbit Vehicle (usdv) Such That the Usdv CAN Perform the Final Deorbit of the International Space Station (ISS) — $425.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 1A-6 Launch Services — $313.8M (Department of Defense)
- National Security Space Launch Phase 3 Lane 1 — $307.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Space Exploration Technologies Corp. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)