DoD's $278.6M INSITE contract awarded to Northrop Grumman for intelligence systems infrastructure
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $278,633,550 ($278.6M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-12-05
End Date: 2027-12-03
Contract Duration: 1,824 days
Daily Burn Rate: $152.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE, TOOLS, AND ENHANCEMENTS (INSITE)
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $278.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE, TOOLS, AND ENHANCEMENTS (INSITE) Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in intelligence systems. 2. Northrop Grumman, a major defense contractor, secured this award. 3. The contract is structured as Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. The duration of the contract extends over five years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 5. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 6. Intelligence Systems Infrastructure, Tools, and Enhancements (INSITE) is a critical program for national security.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure inherently carries higher risk for the government compared to fixed-price contracts, as costs can escalate. While Northrop Grumman is a reputable contractor, the CPFF type necessitates rigorous oversight to ensure value for money. The contract's total value of $278.6 million over approximately five years suggests a substantial but not necessarily excessive investment for complex intelligence systems.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of two delivery orders suggests that the initial award was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) or similar vehicle, and this specific order was competitively selected. A full and open competition generally fosters price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive pricing to win the award.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the government's investment in critical intelligence systems infrastructure.
Public Impact
The Department of the Air Force benefits from enhanced intelligence systems infrastructure, tools, and enhancements. This contract supports national security objectives by improving intelligence gathering and analysis capabilities. The services delivered are crucial for maintaining a technological edge in intelligence operations. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting various intelligence agencies and operational units. Workforce implications may include specialized engineering and technical roles within Northrop Grumman and potentially its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- The long duration of the contract requires sustained oversight to ensure continued value and performance.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess efficiency.
- Reliance on a single large contractor for critical infrastructure could pose long-term dependency risks.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
- Northrop Grumman is a well-established defense contractor with extensive experience in complex systems.
- The contract addresses a critical need for intelligence systems infrastructure, vital for national security.
- The contract is structured to provide necessary enhancements and tools for intelligence operations.
Sector Analysis
The defense sector, particularly intelligence systems, represents a significant portion of federal spending. This contract falls within the engineering services sub-sector, focusing on the development and enhancement of complex IT and intelligence infrastructure. The market for such services is dominated by large, specialized defense contractors. Benchmarking this specific contract's value is difficult without detailed scope, but it aligns with the substantial investments made by the DoD in maintaining and advancing its intelligence capabilities to counter evolving threats.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While Northrop Grumman is a large prime contractor, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The extent of small business subcontracting would depend on Northrop Grumman's own subcontracting plan and the specific requirements of the INSITE program. Without further details on subcontracting goals, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, though large prime contracts often involve a tiered subcontracting structure.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force, with potential involvement from the DoD Inspector General's office. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure necessitates robust financial and performance oversight to manage costs and ensure deliverables meet requirements. Transparency would be enhanced through regular reporting requirements mandated by the contract terms and potentially through public contract award databases, though detailed performance data may be sensitive.
Related Government Programs
- Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise (ICE)
- Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) IT Services
- National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Systems Engineering
- Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight.
- Long contract duration necessitates sustained performance monitoring.
- Potential for cost escalation inherent in CPFF structure.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, air-force, intelligence-systems, engineering-services, northrop-grumman, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, it-infrastructure, national-security, virginia, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $278.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE, TOOLS, AND ENHANCEMENTS (INSITE)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $278.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-12-05. End: 2027-12-03.
What is the historical spending trend for the INSITE program or similar intelligence systems contracts within the Department of Defense?
Analyzing historical spending for the INSITE program specifically is challenging without direct access to its budget history. However, federal spending on intelligence systems and related engineering services has generally trended upwards over the past decade, driven by evolving geopolitical threats and the increasing reliance on advanced technology for intelligence gathering and analysis. Contracts for similar large-scale intelligence infrastructure and IT support within the DoD often run into hundreds of millions of dollars over several years. For instance, other major intelligence IT modernization efforts or platform development contracts within agencies like the NRO or DIA have seen similar or even larger cumulative funding. The $278.6 million awarded to Northrop Grumman for INSITE is consistent with the scale of investment required for maintaining and enhancing critical national security capabilities in this domain.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure of this contract compare to other major intelligence system contracts awarded by the DoD?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type is common in research and development, complex system design, and situations where the scope of work is not fully defined at the outset, which is often the case with advanced intelligence systems. Compared to fixed-price contracts, CPFF offers more flexibility for the contractor to adapt to unforeseen technical challenges, but it places a greater burden on the government to meticulously track costs and ensure efficiency. Many large-scale DoD intelligence programs utilize a mix of contract types, including CPFF for initial development phases and fixed-price for more defined production or sustainment efforts. The choice of CPFF for INSITE suggests the DoD anticipated significant technical evolution or uncertainty during the contract period, prioritizing adaptability over strict cost certainty upfront. However, it necessitates stringent oversight to prevent cost overruns and ensure the fixed fee remains a reasonable incentive for performance.
What specific performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) are typically associated with contracts for intelligence systems infrastructure and enhancements?
Contracts for intelligence systems infrastructure and enhancements typically include a range of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) focused on system availability, performance, security, and maintainability. Common metrics might include system uptime percentages (e.g., 99.9% availability), data processing speeds, latency reduction, successful integration of new tools and functionalities, cybersecurity vulnerability remediation times, and adherence to operational readiness standards. For intelligence-specific systems, KPIs could also relate to the accuracy and timeliness of intelligence product generation, the efficiency of data fusion and analysis tools, and the successful deployment of new sensor or communication technologies. While the specific KPIs for the INSITE contract are not detailed here, they would be crucial for assessing Northrop Grumman's performance and ensuring the government receives value for its investment.
What is Northrop Grumman's track record with similar intelligence systems contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?
Northrop Grumman has a long and extensive track record of developing and supporting complex intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems, as well as command and control (C2) and cyber capabilities for the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies. They are a major prime contractor on numerous classified and unclassified programs involving satellite systems, airborne platforms, ground processing, data analytics, and secure communications. Their experience spans decades and includes significant contributions to national security missions. While specific performance details on individual contracts are often classified or not publicly disclosed, Northrop Grumman's continued success in winning large, critical programs like INSITE indicates a strong performance history and a high level of trust from government clients regarding their technical expertise and program execution capabilities in the sensitive domain of intelligence systems.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source or limited competition award for intelligence systems, and how does full and open competition mitigate these?
Sole-source or limited competition awards for intelligence systems carry risks such as higher costs due to lack of competitive pressure, potential for vendor lock-in, reduced innovation, and a diminished incentive for the contractor to improve efficiency or quality beyond the minimum requirements. These risks are particularly pronounced in the intelligence domain where costs can be substantial and technological advancements are critical. Full and open competition, as utilized for the INSITE contract, directly mitigates these risks by fostering a competitive environment. It encourages multiple bidders to offer their best technical solutions and pricing, leading to better price discovery, potentially lower costs for the government, and greater innovation. The competitive process also provides the government with a wider range of options and reduces reliance on a single provider, enhancing overall program resilience and value for taxpayer money.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: FA875022R0501
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation
Address: 7575 COLSHIRE DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $405,708,899
Exercised Options: $355,735,358
Current Obligation: $278,633,550
Actual Outlays: $356,997
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 255
Total Subaward Amount: $148,322,886
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU325
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-12-05
Current End Date: 2027-12-03
Potential End Date: 2027-12-03 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-24
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)