DoD's $20M electronic security contract with INDYNE, INC. awarded for Saudi Arabia operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,105,551 ($20.1M)
Contractor: Indyne, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-11-30
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,673 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS SECURITY MANAGEMENT AND REMOTE MONITORING ENCLAVE TRANSITION IN SAUDI ARABIA
Place of Performance
Location: CRESTVIEW, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32536
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.1 million to INDYNE, INC for work described as: ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS SECURITY MANAGEMENT AND REMOTE MONITORING ENCLAVE TRANSITION IN SAUDI ARABIA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year security systems services engagement. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of over 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. Services are for security systems management and remote monitoring. 6. Geographic focus on Saudi Arabia presents unique logistical and operational considerations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $20 million over its period of performance seems aligned with the scope of providing electronic systems security management and remote monitoring. Benchmarking against similar multi-year, international security service contracts would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the award suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to bid, which can drive down costs and improve the overall value received for public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel operating in Saudi Arabia, who will receive enhanced security. Services delivered include the management and remote monitoring of electronic security systems. The geographic impact is concentrated in Saudi Arabia, supporting U.S. military operations. Workforce implications may involve specialized security personnel deployed or managed within the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for geopolitical instability in Saudi Arabia impacting service delivery.
- Reliance on remote monitoring could be vulnerable to cyber threats.
- Logistical challenges of operating security systems in a foreign, potentially austere, environment.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract aligns incentives and limits cost uncertainty for the government.
- Long-term contract duration suggests a stable and ongoing requirement.
- Full and open competition indicates a robust procurement process.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the Security Systems Services sector, which includes a wide range of electronic surveillance, access control, and monitoring solutions. This sector is critical for government and defense operations, especially in high-risk or sensitive locations. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous providers offering specialized expertise. The global nature of defense operations often necessitates contracts for security systems in various international theaters.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no explicit small business set-aside mentioned. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on INDYNE, INC.'s procurement practices and the specific needs of the contract, but without set-aside requirements, their inclusion is not guaranteed.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Air Force contracting office. Performance monitoring would likely involve regular reviews of service delivery, adherence to security protocols, and reporting. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed operational oversight specifics are usually internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Security Cooperation Agency programs
- Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts
- Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) support services
Risk Flags
- Geopolitical Risk in Saudi Arabia
- Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities
- Operational Complexity in Foreign Environments
- Long-Term Service Dependency
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, air-force, saudi-arabia, security-systems-services, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, multi-year, electronic-security, remote-monitoring
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.1 million to INDYNE, INC. ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS SECURITY MANAGEMENT AND REMOTE MONITORING ENCLAVE TRANSITION IN SAUDI ARABIA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INDYNE, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-11-30. End: 2026-06-30.
What is INDYNE, INC.'s track record with similar Department of Defense contracts, particularly those involving international security systems?
A review of INDYNE, INC.'s contract history reveals a pattern of engaging with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies on various technical and support services. While specific details on international security systems contracts are not immediately apparent from the provided data, the company has experience in areas that could translate to this requirement. Further investigation into past performance evaluations and contract awards related to security, IT, and base support services in overseas locations would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and track record for this specific engagement in Saudi Arabia.
How does the awarded value of $20 million compare to market rates for similar electronic security management and remote monitoring services in the Middle East?
Benchmarking the $20 million contract value against market rates for similar services in the Middle East requires detailed analysis of the specific security technologies, scope of services, and duration. Factors such as the number of sites, types of monitoring (e.g., CCTV, access control, intrusion detection), response protocols, and required personnel expertise significantly influence pricing. Without a detailed statement of work and specific service level agreements, a precise comparison is challenging. However, multi-year, comprehensive security solutions for defense installations in potentially complex geopolitical regions often command substantial investments, suggesting the awarded value may be within a reasonable range, contingent on the detailed service delivery.
What are the primary risks associated with providing electronic security systems management and remote monitoring in Saudi Arabia for the Department of the Air Force?
Key risks include geopolitical instability, which could disrupt operations or necessitate rapid security adjustments. Cybersecurity threats are a significant concern, as remote monitoring systems can be targets for sophisticated attacks aimed at compromising sensitive data or disabling security functions. Logistical challenges related to deploying and maintaining equipment, ensuring personnel availability and security, and navigating local regulations and infrastructure are also critical. Furthermore, potential cultural and communication barriers, as well as the need for compliance with U.S. and host-nation security standards, add layers of complexity and risk to the contract's execution.
How effective are firm fixed-price contracts in ensuring the successful delivery of complex security services like those required in this contract?
Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally effective in ensuring cost certainty for the government, as the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns. For well-defined requirements, like the management and monitoring of electronic security systems, FFP can incentivize efficiency and performance. However, for complex services where requirements might evolve or unforeseen challenges arise (e.g., due to the operating environment), FFP can sometimes lead to contractors cutting corners to maintain profitability, or conversely, to disputes if scope creep occurs. Clear performance metrics and robust oversight are crucial to mitigate these potential downsides and ensure successful delivery under an FFP structure.
What is the historical spending trend for security systems services by the Department of the Air Force, and how does this contract fit within that pattern?
Historical spending data for security systems services by the Department of the Air Force would reveal trends in investment in physical and electronic security measures across various installations and operations. This $20 million contract, awarded in late 2021 for services extending to mid-2026, represents a significant, multi-year investment. Its allocation to support operations in Saudi Arabia suggests a strategic focus on enhancing security in key overseas locations. Analyzing past spending on similar international security contracts would help contextualize this award, indicating whether it aligns with or deviates from established budgetary patterns for such critical support functions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths)
Product/Service Code: ALARM, SIGNAL, SECURITY DETECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4050 S FERDON BLVD, CRESTVIEW, FL, 32536
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,876,895
Exercised Options: $20,105,551
Current Obligation: $20,105,551
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $2,729,276
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA873020D0013
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-11-30
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-09
More Contracts from Indyne, Inc
- Federal Contract — $968.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200310!000264!5700!CA12 !30 Cons/Lgc !F0468403C0050 !A!N! !Y! !20030711!20030930!161909049!161909049!161909049!n!indyne, Inc !6862 ELM Street !mclean !va!22101!48376!059!51!mclean !fairfax !virginia !+000000400000!n!n!000047964924!r426!communications Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !517110!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!v!2!007!k! !C!Y!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !C! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $778.3M (Department of Defense)
- This IS a Continued Contract for FA2517-18-C-8000. Solid State Phased Array Radar System (sspars) Originally Awarded AS FA2517-18-C-8000, Providing Non-Personal Services to Perform Operations, Maintenance and Support 24/7 for the Sspars System — $348.4M (Department of Defense)
- 45 SW FY09 Funding for Ioms Sustainment — $282.2M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Communications Services, Telephone Service Requirements/Photo — $262.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)