Air Force awards $524.6M contract to MITRE for National Security Engineering Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $524,629,211 ($524.6M)
Contractor: THE Mitre Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-10-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.4M/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE
Place of Performance
Location: BEDFORD, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01730
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $524.6 million to THE MITRE CORPORATION for work described as: MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, non-profit research and development organization. 2. Focus on national security engineering services for the Air Force. 3. Contract duration is one year, with potential for extensions. 4. Pricing structure is Cost No Fee, indicating reimbursement of costs without profit. 5. The awardee, MITRE, is a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC). 6. This award represents a significant portion of the Air Force's spending in this specialized service area.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's Cost No Fee (CNF) structure is typical for FFRDCs like MITRE, where the focus is on objective research and analysis rather than profit. Benchmarking value is challenging without specific deliverables, but the CNF structure generally aims to cover costs and ensure access to specialized expertise. The total award amount of $524.6 million over one year suggests a substantial scope of work, but without detailed performance metrics or comparison to similar FFRDC contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis to The MITRE Corporation. As a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC), MITRE is uniquely positioned to provide specialized national security engineering services to the Department of Defense. Sole-source awards to FFRDCs are common due to their established expertise, government-sponsored mission, and lack of direct competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards to FFRDCs like MITRE are generally accepted as a necessary mechanism for accessing specialized, objective technical support. While this limits direct price competition, it ensures the government can leverage unique capabilities critical for national security.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Air Force, receiving critical national security engineering support. Services delivered are expected to enhance the Air Force's technological capabilities and strategic planning. The geographic impact is national, supporting Air Force operations and research initiatives across various locations. Workforce implications include continued employment for MITRE's specialized engineers and researchers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding limits price discovery and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
- Sole-source nature means no direct comparison of technical approaches or innovative solutions from other providers.
- Cost-reimbursement structure, while standard for FFRDCs, requires robust oversight to ensure cost efficiency.
Positive Signals
- Award to MITRE, a highly respected FFRDC with a proven track record in national security.
- Contract focuses on critical national security engineering, aligning with government priorities.
- Cost No Fee structure emphasizes mission accomplishment over profit, potentially leading to more objective analysis.
- One-year base period allows for flexibility and reassessment of needs before future commitments.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically focusing on national security engineering. This sector is characterized by highly specialized expertise and often involves long-term relationships with government agencies. MITRE, as an FFRDC, operates within a unique segment of this market, providing objective research and development support that is not typically available from commercial entities. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the specialized nature of FFRDC work, but the scale of this award indicates a significant investment in advanced engineering capabilities.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as it was awarded sole-source to The MITRE Corporation. MITRE, as an FFRDC, is a large, non-profit organization. There is no explicit indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data, though MITRE's broader operations may involve such arrangements. The direct award to MITRE bypasses the typical competitive processes that might include small business participation goals.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this Cost No Fee contract will likely be managed by the contracting agency within the Department of the Air Force. As a sole-source award to an FFRDC, oversight will focus on ensuring that costs incurred are reasonable and allocable to the contract's objectives, and that MITRE fulfills its mission-oriented responsibilities. Transparency is generally high for FFRDC work, with regular reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs)
- National Security Programs
- Air Force Research and Development
- Advanced Engineering Services
- Department of Defense IT and Engineering Support
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost-reimbursement contract type
- FFRDC reliance
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, mitre-corporation, national-security, engineering-services, sole-source, cost-no-fee, ffrdc, professional-scientific-technical-services, massachusetts, definitive-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $524.6 million to THE MITRE CORPORATION. MITRE NATIONAL SECURITY ENGINEERING CENTER (NSEC) SERVICES FOR THE AIR FORCE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE MITRE CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $524.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What is MITRE's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly the Air Force?
The MITRE Corporation has a long-standing and extensive track record of supporting the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Air Force. As a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), MITRE operates under various contracts and agreements to provide objective, independent research, development, and analysis. Their work often spans critical areas such as command and control, cybersecurity, systems engineering, and advanced technology integration. For the Air Force specifically, MITRE has been instrumental in areas like air and space systems development, modernization efforts, and strategic planning. Their deep institutional knowledge and technical expertise make them a trusted partner for complex national security challenges, often leading to sole-source or limited-competition awards for specialized services.
How does the Cost No Fee (CNF) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar services?
The Cost No Fee (CNF) pricing structure is unique in that it reimburses the contractor for all allowable costs incurred in performing the contract but provides no fee or profit. This structure is typically reserved for specific types of organizations, most notably Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) like MITRE, whose primary mission is objective research and analysis rather than commercial gain. Unlike cost-plus-fee (CPF) contracts, which include a fee, or fixed-price contracts, which establish a set price regardless of cost, CNF aims to ensure that the government receives the benefit of the contractor's expertise without the profit motive influencing the research or recommendations. This structure necessitates robust government oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and directly related to contract performance, but it is often seen as a mechanism to ensure unbiased technical support.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award of this magnitude?
The primary risks associated with a sole-source award of this magnitude, particularly to an FFRDC, revolve around the lack of direct competition. This can lead to potential inefficiencies if cost controls are not rigorously applied, as there is no market pressure to drive down prices. There's also a risk that alternative, potentially more innovative or cost-effective solutions from other providers might not be considered. Furthermore, over-reliance on a single source, even a trusted FFRDC, can create dependencies and limit the government's flexibility in exploring a broader range of technological advancements or strategic partnerships. Ensuring strong contract oversight and performance management becomes paramount to mitigate these risks and maximize the value derived from the investment.
How does this contract align with the Air Force's broader strategic objectives in national security?
This contract directly aligns with the Air Force's strategic objectives by providing essential national security engineering services. The Air Force, like other branches of the military, faces rapidly evolving threats and technological landscapes. Contracts like this enable the Air Force to leverage specialized expertise, often from FFRDCs like MITRE, to develop, integrate, and sustain advanced capabilities. This includes areas such as resilient command and control systems, advanced cyber defenses, space domain awareness, and next-generation aerospace technologies. By securing these services, the Air Force aims to maintain its technological superiority, enhance operational effectiveness, and ensure national security in an increasingly complex global environment.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar national security engineering services within the Air Force?
Historical spending patterns for national security engineering services within the Air Force, especially those involving FFRDCs like MITRE, tend to show consistent, significant investment. These services are critical for maintaining technological advantage and addressing complex defense challenges. While specific figures fluctuate year-to-year based on evolving priorities and program lifecycles, the Air Force consistently allocates substantial resources to research, development, and specialized technical support. Awards to FFRDCs often represent a stable, long-term commitment due to the nature of the work and the unique capabilities these organizations provide. The $524.6 million awarded here is indicative of the scale of investment typically seen for high-priority national security engineering initiatives within the Air Force, reflecting ongoing needs in areas like modernization, cybersecurity, and advanced systems integration.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 202 BURLINGTON RD, BEDFORD, MA, 01730
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $544,266,710
Exercised Options: $544,266,710
Current Obligation: $524,629,211
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2028-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-25
More Contracts from THE Mitre Corporation
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (Department of Transportation)
- FY25 Task Order 7 - to Provide Systems Engineering Research and Development Services for the Department of Defense (DOD) and Other Federal Government Agencies — $753.9M (Department of Defense)
- FY24 Task Order 6 - Initial Funding and Updating PWS & DD254 — $735.3M (Department of Defense)
- Caasd Must Provide Essential Engineering, Research, and Analysis Capabilities to Support the FAA in the Performance of ITS Mission Through a Systems Approach That Addresses ALL Dimensions (E.G. Political, Operational, Economic, Technical) Required to — $700.5M (Department of Transportation)
- Initial Modification on Task Order 5 Nsec, Ffrdc to Incrementally Fund, Update PWS & DD254 — $687.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)