Air Force Awards $5.77M for Iraq DB-110 TGS to Goodrich Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $5,771,297 ($5.8M)
Contractor: Goodrich Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-12-23
End Date: 2027-03-22
Contract Duration: 454 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IRAQ DB-110 - TGS PURCHASE
Place of Performance
Location: WESTFORD, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01886
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $5.8 million to GOODRICH CORPORATION for work described as: IRAQ DB-110 - TGS PURCHASE Key points: 1. Goodrich Corporation, a major aerospace manufacturer, secured this contract. 2. The contract is for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'. 3. The total award value is $5,771,297. 4. The contract duration is 454 days. 5. This is a delivery order under an existing contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award value of $5.77M for aircraft parts seems within a reasonable range for specialized components. However, without specific part details or historical pricing for similar TGS units, a precise benchmark is difficult. The 'Other Aircraft Parts' category is broad.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was awarded as a 'NOT COMPETED' delivery order, indicating it was likely placed under an existing indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a sole-source justification. This limits price discovery and competitive pressure, potentially leading to higher costs.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are used for this purchase. The lack of competition may result in a higher price than if it were openly competed, impacting overall value for money.
Public Impact
Supports ongoing Air Force operations and readiness. Ensures availability of critical aircraft components. Impacts the aerospace manufacturing sector, specifically parts suppliers. Funds allocated through the Department of Defense budget.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about price reasonableness.
- Broad NAICS code 'Other Aircraft Parts' lacks specificity.
- Delivery order under existing contract may not reflect current market prices.
Positive Signals
- Award to established manufacturer Goodrich Corporation.
- Clear end date for contract performance.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by complex supply chains and specialized manufacturing. Spending on aircraft parts is a significant component of defense budgets, often involving long-term contracts and a limited number of qualified suppliers.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to Goodrich Corporation, a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific award, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
As a delivery order under an existing contract, oversight may be less intensive than for a new, competed award. However, the Air Force is responsible for ensuring the necessity and reasonableness of the purchase.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Limited transparency on specific components
- Unclear justification for sole-source award
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ma, delivery-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $5.8 million to GOODRICH CORPORATION. IRAQ DB-110 - TGS PURCHASE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GOODRICH CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $5.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-23. End: 2027-03-22.
What specific TGS components are being procured, and how do their prices compare to similar components from other suppliers or historical data?
The data provided does not specify the exact TGS components. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of the parts, their technical specifications, and a comparison against industry benchmarks or previous procurements of identical or comparable items would be necessary. Without this, the $5.77M award is difficult to validate against market rates.
What is the justification for awarding this delivery order on a 'NOT COMPETED' basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?
The justification for 'NOT COMPETED' is not provided. Typically, this occurs when the item is only available from a single source or under an existing IDIQ contract. The government should have performed a price analysis, potentially using historical pricing, commercial price lists, or other available data, to ensure the price was fair and reasonable despite the lack of competition.
How does this procurement align with the Air Force's long-term strategy for maintaining its aircraft fleet, and are there plans for future competition of these or similar parts?
The alignment with long-term strategy is unclear without knowing the specific TGS components and their role in fleet maintenance. Future competition depends on whether the underlying contract allows for it or if new solicitations will be issued. Understanding the sustainment plan for these aircraft is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of this procurement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: RTX Corp
Address: 7 TECHNOLOGY PARK DR, WESTFORD, MA, 01886
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $5,771,297
Exercised Options: $5,771,297
Current Obligation: $5,771,297
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA869125GB001
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-23
Current End Date: 2027-03-22
Potential End Date: 2027-03-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-22
More Contracts from Goodrich Corporation
- MS-110 Taiwan Basic Delivery Order — $205.5M (Department of Defense)
- Saudi Arabia F-15 DB-110 Recce POD Program — $187.6M (Department of Defense)
- R&d-Misc Hard Goods-B RES — $154.8M (Department of Defense)
- Dummy Document for Transaction 6 Mods — $90.8M (Department of Defense)
- MS-177A Production — $79.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)