DoD awards Boeing $23.9M for Navigation Systems, raising concerns about limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,915,981 ($23.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-04-21

End Date: 2006-09-30

Contract Duration: 527 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT CHARLES, ST. CHARLES County, MISSOURI, 63301

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value awarded to a single large vendor. 2. Lack of competition may lead to inflated prices. 3. Potential for taxpayer funds to be used inefficiently. 4. Focus on critical navigation systems highlights national security implications.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $23.9 million for navigation systems is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to similar contracts in the market.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This limits price discovery and potentially increases costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these navigation systems, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Awarded to a major defense contractor, potentially impacting smaller businesses. Essential navigation systems are critical for military operations. Long-term reliance on a single provider could create future dependency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for overpricing

Positive Signals

  • Award to established defense contractor
  • Critical system procurement

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on navigation and guidance systems. Spending in this area is often characterized by high R&D costs and specialized manufacturing, with a significant portion of the market dominated by a few large prime contractors.

Small Business Impact

The sole-source nature of this award to a large prime contractor like Boeing typically offers limited direct opportunities for small businesses, unless they are subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' designation suggests a waiver of standard competitive procedures. Oversight is crucial to ensure the justification for this sole-source award was sound and that the pricing is fair and reasonable.

Related Government Programs

  • Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited transparency on justification
  • Dependency on a single vendor

Tags

search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, mo, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-04-21. End: 2006-09-30.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors such as unique capabilities, urgent need, or the unavailability of other sources. Without access to the specific documentation, it's impossible to confirm the exact reasons. However, such justifications are often scrutinized to prevent potential abuses and ensure fair use of taxpayer funds.

How does the $23.9 million price compare to industry benchmarks for similar navigation systems?

Benchmarking this specific contract's price is challenging without detailed technical specifications and market data for comparable systems. However, given the sole-source nature, there's an inherent risk that the price may be higher than if it had undergone a competitive bidding process. Independent cost analysis would be required for a definitive comparison.

What is the long-term strategic risk of relying solely on Boeing for these critical navigation systems?

The long-term strategic risk includes potential vendor lock-in, reduced innovation due to lack of competition, and vulnerability if Boeing faces production issues or significant price increases in the future. This dependency could impact the Air Force's flexibility and potentially increase future acquisition costs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNavigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments ManufacturingSearch, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: J S MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-04-21

Current End Date: 2006-09-30

Potential End Date: 2006-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-08-06

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending