DoD's $552K R&D contract for NDE methods awarded to University of Dayton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,523,162 ($5.5M)

Contractor: University of Dayton

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-07-31

End Date: 2026-07-30

Contract Duration: 2,556 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: RESEARCH IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION USING MODEL-BASED AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, MONTGOMERY County, OHIO, 45469

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $5.5 million to UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON for work described as: RESEARCH IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION USING MODEL-BASED AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS Key points: 1. Contract focuses on advanced research in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. 2. University of Dayton, a research institution, is the primary contractor. 3. The contract is for research and development in physical sciences. 4. Awarded by the Department of the Air Force, indicating a defense-related need. 5. The contract duration spans over 7 years, suggesting a long-term research objective. 6. This award falls under the broad category of R&D in physical sciences.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $552,316 is relatively modest for a multi-year R&D effort. Benchmarking against similar contracts in quantitative nondestructive evaluation is challenging without more specific details on the research scope and deliverables. However, the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract type suggests that costs are reimbursed, with a fixed fee for profit, which can sometimes lead to less price sensitivity compared to fixed-price contracts. Further analysis would require comparing the proposed research outcomes and the associated costs to similar academic or government-funded R&D projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple sources were solicited and considered. This approach generally promotes a competitive environment, allowing for a wider range of proposals and potentially better pricing. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition process was intended.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best value through a competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force, which will gain insights into advanced nondestructive evaluation techniques. The research aims to improve methods for assessing material integrity without causing damage, potentially enhancing the safety and reliability of defense assets. The geographic impact is primarily within Ohio, where the University of Dayton is located, potentially fostering local research talent and infrastructure. The contract supports academic research and development, contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge in physical and engineering sciences.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The CPFF contract type may incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
The long duration of the contract could present challenges in adapting to evolving research needs or technological advancements.
Limited information on specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the project's progress and success.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive selection process.
The contractor, University of Dayton, is an established research institution with relevant expertise.
The research focus on nondestructive evaluation is critical for defense asset integrity and safety.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. The market for quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) research is specialized, serving industries that require high levels of material integrity and safety assurance, such as aerospace, defense, and manufacturing. Benchmarking spending in this niche R&D area is difficult without more granular data, but it represents investment in foundational science with potential long-term applications.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve small business set-asides, as the primary contractor is a university. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The focus on academic research suggests that the primary goal is scientific advancement rather than direct support for the small business industrial base through this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Air Force. Performance monitoring would likely involve regular progress reports, technical reviews, and financial audits, especially given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific research findings may be subject to classification or proprietary considerations.

Related Government Programs

Defense Research and Development
Materials Science Research
Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation
University Research Grants
Air Force Science and Technology Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF Contract Type)
Scope Creep Potential
Long-Term Project Management Challenges

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $5.5 million to UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON. RESEARCH IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION USING MODEL-BASED AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-07-31. End: 2026-07-30.

What is the specific research scope and expected deliverables for this contract?

The contract, "Research in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation Using Model-Based and Experimental Methods," awarded to the University of Dayton, aims to advance the understanding and application of quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques. While specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, such contracts typically involve the development of new theoretical models, experimental validation of these models, creation of advanced NDE methodologies, and potentially the development of prototypes or advanced simulation tools. The research likely focuses on improving the accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of detecting and characterizing material flaws or damage in critical components, particularly relevant for defense applications where structural integrity is paramount. The expected outcomes would contribute to enhanced safety, reduced maintenance costs, and improved operational readiness of military assets.

How does the University of Dayton's track record in NDE research compare to other potential contractors?

The University of Dayton has a well-established reputation and significant history in materials science and engineering, including extensive work in nondestructive evaluation. Their Research Institute has been a key player in defense-related research for decades, often collaborating with government agencies and industry partners on advanced materials and testing methodologies. They possess specialized facilities and a deep pool of researchers experienced in areas like ultrasonics, thermography, and eddy current testing, which are core to quantitative NDE. While specific comparative data against other potential bidders for this particular contract is not publicly available, the University of Dayton's consistent involvement in high-level R&D projects, including those funded by the Department of Defense, suggests a strong and relevant track record in this specialized field.

What are the primary risks associated with this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract?

The primary risks associated with this CPFF contract revolve around cost control and potential for cost overruns. In a CPFF structure, the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. This can reduce the contractor's incentive to control costs rigorously, as they are guaranteed their costs will be covered. If the government's oversight is insufficient, or if the project scope expands unexpectedly without proper modification, costs could exceed initial estimates. Another risk is the potential for scope creep, where the research objectives may evolve beyond the original intent, leading to increased effort and cost. Ensuring clear definition of work, robust progress monitoring, and effective change control processes are crucial to mitigating these risks.

How effective is the current approach to quantitative NDE research in meeting Air Force needs?

The effectiveness of the current approach to quantitative NDE research in meeting Air Force needs is demonstrated by the continued investment in this area. The Air Force relies heavily on NDE for ensuring the structural integrity and safety of its aircraft, vehicles, and infrastructure. Advances in quantitative NDE allow for more precise defect sizing, better prediction of component life, and more reliable go/no-go decisions, thereby reducing risks of in-flight failures or catastrophic events. By funding research like that conducted by the University of Dayton, the Air Force aims to stay at the forefront of NDE technology, developing methods that can detect smaller flaws, work on novel materials, and integrate seamlessly with digital engineering and predictive maintenance strategies. The long-term nature of this contract suggests a recognized need for ongoing advancements in this critical capability.

What are the historical spending patterns for NDE research within the Department of Defense?

Historical spending patterns for NDE research within the Department of Defense (DoD) show a consistent and significant investment over many years, reflecting its critical importance to military readiness and safety. While specific aggregate figures fluctuate annually, the DoD consistently allocates substantial funds towards R&D in materials science, structural integrity, and advanced manufacturing, with NDE being a core component. Funding often comes through various channels, including direct research contracts with universities and research institutions, internal laboratory projects, and programs managed by specific service branches like the Air Force, Navy, and Army. Trends indicate a move towards more quantitative, model-based, and data-driven NDE approaches, aligning with broader digital transformation initiatives within the DoD. Spending is often driven by the need to support aging fleets, develop capabilities for new platforms and materials, and enhance predictive maintenance programs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › General Science and Technology R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: BASIC RESEARCH

Solicitation ID: FA865019S5009

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 COLLEGE PARK, DAYTON, OH, 45469

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Educational Institution, Higher Education, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Higher Education (Private), Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,749,203

Exercised Options: $5,749,203

Current Obligation: $5,523,162

Actual Outlays: $161,264

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA865019D5230

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline