DoD's $1.4B F-15 Radar Buy: Boeing Secures Sole-Source Contract Amidst ACAT II Program

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,399,773,518 ($1.4B)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-10-30

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 3,896 days

Daily Burn Rate: $359.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: F-15; ACAT II: RMP/V3 COMBINED RADAR BUY FY15

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $1.40 billion to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: F-15; ACAT II: RMP/V3 COMBINED RADAR BUY FY15 Key points: 1. Significant investment in critical aircraft modernization. 2. Sole-source award to Boeing raises questions about competition and price. 3. Long contract duration (3896 days) implies substantial program lifecycle. 4. Focus on fixed-price incentive contract type suggests shared risk. 5. Aircraft Manufacturing sector sees substantial DoD spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $1.4 billion for F-15 radar systems is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar advanced radar systems or alternative solutions.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to drive down prices.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this large procurement may result in taxpayers paying a premium for the F-15 radar systems.

Public Impact

Modernization of the F-15 fleet ensures continued air superiority capabilities. Long-term contract provides stability for a key defense contractor. Potential for cost overruns due to sole-source nature requires close monitoring. Impact on the aerospace manufacturing sector in Missouri.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Critical defense system upgrade
  • Fixed-price incentive contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Manufacturing sector, a significant area of defense spending. Benchmarks for similar large-scale avionics or radar system procurements are often difficult to establish due to unique system requirements and proprietary technologies.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved as prime contractors in this specific procurement. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are participating as subcontractors to The Boeing Company.

Oversight & Accountability

Given the sole-source nature and significant value, robust oversight by the Department of the Air Force is crucial to manage costs, ensure performance, and verify the necessity of the procurement throughout its extended duration.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
  • Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation and scope creep.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing due to non-competitive nature.
  • Potential for contractor lock-in with specialized technology.

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, mo, definitive-contract, billion-dollar

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $1.40 billion to THE BOEING COMPANY. F-15; ACAT II: RMP/V3 COMBINED RADAR BUY FY15

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.40 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-10-30. End: 2026-06-30.

What specific factors justified the sole-source award for the F-15 radar systems, and were alternatives thoroughly explored?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where only one source can fulfill the requirement. For the F-15 radar, this could stem from specific integration challenges with the existing airframe or unique performance specifications. A thorough review would involve documenting why other potential sources, including upgrades to existing systems or alternative technologies, were deemed unsuitable or less advantageous.

How will the fixed-price incentive contract structure mitigate potential cost overruns given the long duration and sole-source nature?

A fixed-price incentive (FPI) contract aims to control costs by establishing target costs, target profits, and share ratios for cost variances. If Boeing incurs costs above the target, both the government and the contractor share the excess cost. Conversely, if costs are below the target, profits are shared. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively, but close government monitoring of performance and cost reporting is still essential, especially over a long program lifecycle.

What is the projected impact of this radar upgrade on the F-15's operational effectiveness and survivability in modern threat environments?

Modern radar systems significantly enhance a fighter jet's situational awareness, target detection range, tracking capabilities, and electronic warfare resilience. For the F-15, an upgraded radar is expected to improve its ability to identify and engage threats at longer distances, operate more effectively in contested airspace, and potentially counter advanced enemy electronic countermeasures, thereby extending the platform's relevance and survivability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,437,659,285

Exercised Options: $1,413,058,341

Current Obligation: $1,399,773,518

Actual Outlays: $34,325,690

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-10-30

Current End Date: 2026-06-30

Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-16

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending