DoD Awards $47.1M for C-17 Weapons System Trainer to Boeing, Raising Value and Oversight Questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,137,267 ($47.1M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-05-01

End Date: 2023-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,247 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: C-17 WEAONS SYSTEM TRAINER PURCHASE

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.1 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: C-17 WEAONS SYSTEM TRAINER PURCHASE Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $47.1 million for a specialized trainer. 2. Sole awardee, The Boeing Company, limits competitive pricing pressure. 3. Potential risks include vendor lock-in and ensuring cost-effectiveness. 4. Spending falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $47.1 million for a C-17 Weapons System Trainer appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar complex training systems is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns, but the firm fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to control costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Although the contract was awarded under full and open competition, the single award to The Boeing Company suggests they were the only viable bidder or offered the best value. This limits direct price comparison and may reduce competitive pressure on future modifications.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for a critical training system. While competition was sought, the single award necessitates careful oversight to ensure the price reflects fair market value and avoids excessive costs over the contract's life.

Public Impact

Ensures continued readiness and training for C-17 aircrews and maintenance personnel. Supports advanced simulation capabilities for realistic combat and operational scenarios. Contributes to the overall operational effectiveness of the C-17 Globemaster III fleet.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition despite full and open solicitation.
  • Potential for cost overruns if scope expands.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for critical training systems.

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed-price contract aims to control costs.
  • Supports essential military training and readiness.
  • Awarded to a known, experienced defense contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, which includes specialized components and systems for aircraft. Spending in this area is often driven by specific platform needs and technological advancements, with significant R&D investment typical.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses. The prime contractor, The Boeing Company, is a large aerospace corporation. There is no information provided on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a structured procurement process. However, the single award necessitates robust oversight from the Department of the Air Force to monitor performance, manage costs, and ensure the contractor meets all contractual obligations.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for sole-source dependency on Boeing for future modifications.
  • Lack of transparency on specific cost components for value assessment.
  • Limited visibility into small business subcontracting.
  • Need for ongoing performance monitoring to ensure training effectiveness.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.1 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. C-17 WEAONS SYSTEM TRAINER PURCHASE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-05-01. End: 2023-09-30.

What specific performance metrics are in place to ensure the trainer effectively meets C-17 operational training requirements?

The contract likely includes detailed performance work statements (PWS) outlining specific training objectives, simulation fidelity requirements, and availability standards. The Air Force would monitor adherence to these metrics through regular progress reviews, user feedback from aircrews and instructors, and potentially independent testing to validate the trainer's effectiveness in preparing personnel for real-world missions.

How will the Air Force mitigate the risk of vendor lock-in and ensure competitive pricing for future trainer upgrades or sustainment?

To mitigate vendor lock-in, the Air Force should actively plan for future competition by developing modular trainer designs and maintaining detailed documentation. They can also explore options for independent sustainment or third-party support. For future upgrades, issuing new solicitations with clear performance-based requirements, rather than sole-source modifications, will be crucial to encourage new entrants and competitive pricing.

What is the projected return on investment for this trainer purchase in terms of improved C-17 operational readiness and reduced training costs?

The return on investment is expected through enhanced pilot and crew proficiency, leading to fewer mission failures and increased operational effectiveness. Furthermore, advanced simulators can reduce the need for expensive flight hours, fuel, and aircraft wear-and-tear, potentially offering significant long-term cost savings compared to purely flight-based training, though a precise ROI calculation would require detailed cost-benefit analysis.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JAMES S MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,327,609

Exercised Options: $47,137,267

Current Obligation: $47,137,267

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 7

Total Subaward Amount: $30,223,821

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA862115D6266

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-05-01

Current End Date: 2023-09-30

Potential End Date: 2023-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-03-08

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending