DoD Awards $1.7B L3Harris Contract for Aircraft Parts, Raising Competition Concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,988,879 ($17.0M)
Contractor: L3harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-08-26
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,404 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: BIG SAFARI
Place of Performance
Location: GREENVILLE, HUNT County, TEXAS, 75402
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.0 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. for work described as: BIG SAFARI Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $1.7 billion awarded to L3Harris Technologies. 2. Lack of competition noted, with the contract being 'NOT COMPETED'. 3. Potential risk associated with sole-source or limited competition awards. 4. Spending falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the $1.7 billion price represents fair market value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was 'NOT COMPETED', indicating a limited or sole-source procurement. This method bypasses competitive bidding, potentially impacting price discovery and leading to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers are receiving the best possible value for this significant expenditure.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense is relying on a single vendor for critical aircraft parts. Future procurements in this category may be influenced by this non-competitive award.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- High contract value
Positive Signals
- Award to established defense contractor
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military aviation readiness, but competitive pricing is essential to ensure efficient use of funds.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as both 'ss' and 'sb' fields are false. The prime contractor, L3Harris Technologies, is a large corporation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential gap in oversight regarding competitive sourcing strategies. Further review is needed to understand the justification for bypassing competition and ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency in pricing
- Risk of vendor lock-in
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.0 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.. BIG SAFARI
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-08-26. End: 2026-06-30.
What was the specific justification for not competing this $1.7 billion contract, and how does the Air Force ensure fair pricing under a Cost Plus Fixed Fee arrangement without competitive benchmarks?
The justification for not competing this contract is not provided in the data. However, agencies typically cite reasons such as urgency, unique capabilities, or lack of available sources. For Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts, agencies establish target costs and fee structures, and monitor contractor performance closely to control expenses. Without competition, the baseline for 'fair pricing' is harder to establish, relying more on historical data, independent cost estimates, and rigorous negotiation.
What are the long-term risks associated with awarding such a large contract on a non-competitive basis, particularly concerning potential cost overruns and vendor lock-in?
Awarding large contracts non-competitively carries significant risks. It can lead to cost overruns as the vendor may lack the incentive to control expenses without competitive pressure. Furthermore, it can result in vendor lock-in, where the agency becomes dependent on a single supplier, limiting future flexibility and potentially increasing prices in subsequent procurements. This also stifles innovation from other potential suppliers.
How does this $1.7 billion expenditure align with the Department of Defense's overall strategy for aircraft parts procurement and sustainment, especially regarding cost-effectiveness and supply chain
The alignment of this $1.7 billion expenditure with broader DoD strategies is unclear without further context on the specific aircraft parts and their criticality. Non-competitive awards can sometimes be justified for specialized or long-lead items essential for sustainment. However, a pattern of such awards may indicate a need to re-evaluate procurement strategies to enhance cost-effectiveness and build a more resilient, competitive supply chain for critical components.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc
Address: 10001 JACK FINNEY BLVD, GREENVILLE, TX, 75402
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,988,879
Exercised Options: $16,988,879
Current Obligation: $16,988,879
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 8
Total Subaward Amount: $5,918,252
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862021G4027
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-08-26
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-04
More Contracts from L3harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P.
- BIG Safari — $660.1M (Department of Defense)
- BIG Safari — $579.0M (Department of Defense)
- BIG Safari — $371.6M (Department of Defense)
- Java MAN III — $358.6M (Department of Defense)
- Acat III BIG Safari — $341.4M (Department of Defense)
View all L3harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)