DoD awards $41.7M for MQ-9 Reaper Link-16 integration, a sole-source contract to General Atomics
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $41,702,561 ($41.7M)
Contractor: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-10-03
End Date: 2026-01-30
Contract Duration: 2,311 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: MQ-9 REAPER LINK-16 INTEGRATION
Place of Performance
Location: POWAY, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92064
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $41.7 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: MQ-9 REAPER LINK-16 INTEGRATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about price competition. 2. Significant duration of the contract (2311 days) suggests a long-term integration effort. 3. The contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. 4. Focus on integrating Link-16 capability into the MQ-9 Reaper platform. 5. The prime contractor, General Atomics, is a key player in unmanned aerial vehicle manufacturing. 6. This contract represents a specific capability enhancement within a larger defense program.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this specific integration contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and specialized technical scope. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the fixed fee adequately reflects market rates for such integration services. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates rigorous oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and that the fixed fee is appropriate for the defined scope. Comparisons to similar integration efforts on other platforms or for different systems would be necessary for a more robust value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., was solicited. This approach is typically used when a specific capability is only available from a single source or when there's a compelling justification for avoiding full and open competition. The lack of multiple bidders means there was no direct price competition, potentially leading to higher costs for the government compared to a competed contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may face higher costs due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government relies on the contractor's proposed costs and fee being reasonable, necessitating strong negotiation and oversight.
Public Impact
The U.S. Air Force benefits from enhanced communication and data-sharing capabilities for its MQ-9 Reaper fleet. Improved situational awareness and interoperability for MQ-9 Reaper operations. The integration of Link-16 technology is critical for modern warfare, enabling real-time data exchange. This contract supports the continued modernization and operational effectiveness of a key unmanned aerial system.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pressure on pricing.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent risk of cost growth.
- Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to specialized integration expertise.
Positive Signals
- Addresses a critical operational capability (Link-16) for a key platform (MQ-9 Reaper).
- Contractor (General Atomics) has extensive experience with the MQ-9 platform.
- Long contract duration suggests a comprehensive and potentially well-defined integration plan.
- Awarded by a major defense agency (Department of the Air Force) indicating strategic importance.
Sector Analysis
The defense sector, particularly within unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and avionics integration, is characterized by high technological complexity and significant government investment. Contracts like this are crucial for maintaining the technological edge of military platforms. The market for UAS manufacturing and integration is dominated by a few large defense contractors, including General Atomics. Spending in this area is driven by the need for advanced surveillance, reconnaissance, and strike capabilities, with integration of secure communication systems like Link-16 being a priority.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., a large prime contractor, and there is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting plans being a primary focus. Given the specialized nature of the integration and the sole-source award, the direct impact on small businesses within this specific contract is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses for specific components or services, but this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, rigorous financial oversight and auditing will be essential to monitor costs and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate. Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award and the contractor's performance metrics would be key accountability measures. The Inspector General's office may also conduct audits or investigations as deemed necessary.
Related Government Programs
- MQ-9 Reaper Program
- Link-16 Tactical Data Link
- Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Systems
- Avionics Integration Services
- Defense Communications Systems
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
- Lack of competitive benchmarking
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, mq-9-reaper, link-16, avionics-integration, unmanned-aerial-vehicle, general-atomics-aeronautical-systems, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, california, aircraft-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $41.7 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.. MQ-9 REAPER LINK-16 INTEGRATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $41.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-10-03. End: 2026-01-30.
What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. While the specific justification is not detailed, common reasons for sole-source awards in defense contracting include: unique capabilities possessed by only one contractor, urgent and compelling needs where competition is not feasible, or when the system is a follow-on effort to a previously competed contract where only the original contractor has the necessary technical knowledge and proprietary data. For the MQ-9 Reaper Link-16 integration, it's plausible that General Atomics, as the prime contractor for the MQ-9, possesses unique expertise or proprietary access required for this specific integration, making full and open competition impractical or excessively costly.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type compare to other contract types in terms of risk and potential cost overruns?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts are used when the scope of work is not precisely defined, or when there is uncertainty in the cost of performance. The government agrees to pay the contractor's actual costs plus a fixed fee, which represents the contractor's profit. This structure shifts some of the cost risk to the government, as it bears the actual costs incurred. While the fee is fixed, the total contract cost can increase if actual costs exceed initial estimates. Compared to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts, where the contractor bears most of the cost risk, CPFF offers more flexibility for the government in evolving requirements but requires robust oversight to control costs and ensure the fixed fee remains reasonable for the effort.
What is the historical spending trend for MQ-9 Reaper integration or similar avionics upgrades?
Historical spending data for MQ-9 Reaper integration and similar avionics upgrades would typically show a consistent investment by the Department of Defense to enhance the capabilities of its unmanned aerial systems. The MQ-9 platform has undergone numerous upgrades since its inception to improve its sensor suites, communication systems, and weapon integration. Spending on such upgrades is often project-specific and can vary significantly year-to-year based on program priorities and technological advancements. Without access to detailed historical contract databases for this specific integration type, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but it's reasonable to assume that ongoing investments in platform modernization are substantial, reflecting the strategic importance of the MQ-9 fleet.
What are the potential performance risks associated with integrating Link-16 onto the MQ-9 Reaper?
Integrating a complex system like Link-16 onto the MQ-9 Reaper presents several potential performance risks. These include technical challenges in ensuring seamless interoperability between the Link-16 terminal and the MQ-9's existing avionics and data architecture. There's a risk of software incompatibilities, hardware integration issues, and electromagnetic interference. Furthermore, ensuring the security and reliability of the Link-16 data transmission in contested environments is critical. Performance risks also extend to the testing and validation phases, where thorough verification is needed to confirm the system meets all operational requirements and safety standards before deployment.
How does this contract align with the Air Force's broader strategy for unmanned aerial systems?
This contract aligns with the Air Force's broader strategy by enhancing the operational capabilities of a key platform within its unmanned aerial systems portfolio. The MQ-9 Reaper is a critical asset for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), and strike missions. Integrating Link-16, a secure, jam-resistant tactical data link, significantly improves the platform's ability to share real-time battlefield information with other assets and command centers. This enhances situational awareness, improves targeting accuracy, and enables more effective network-centric warfare operations, which are central tenets of the Air Force's modernization efforts for its UAS fleet.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14200 KIRKHAM WAY, POWAY, CA, 92064
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,792,561
Exercised Options: $41,792,561
Current Obligation: $41,702,561
Actual Outlays: $1,091,587
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 12
Total Subaward Amount: $46,971,769
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862015G4040
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-10-03
Current End Date: 2026-01-30
Potential End Date: 2026-01-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-12
More Contracts from General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
- Requirement IS for the Procurement of Performance Based Logistics Support Services for the MQ-1C Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System — $1.9B (Department of Defense)
- Award of Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA) for FY 12 MQ-1C Gray Eagle Program of Record and Quick Reaction Capability Performance-Based Logistics Product Support — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- FY 13 Full Rate Production of the Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System and FY 12 Backfill Requirements — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- FY17 Gray Eagle Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Effort — $936.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $646.6M (Department of Defense)
View all General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)