DoD's $71M GCS Retrofit Contract Awarded to General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $70,922,679 ($70.9M)
Contractor: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-09-21
End Date: 2024-07-18
Contract Duration: 2,127 days
Daily Burn Rate: $33.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FY18 BLK 30 GCS RETROFIT
Place of Performance
Location: POWAY, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92064
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $70.9 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: FY18 BLK 30 GCS RETROFIT Key points: 1. The contract is for Aircraft Manufacturing, specifically a GCS Retrofit. 2. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. is the sole awardee. 3. The contract duration is substantial at 2127 days. 4. The award was not competed, raising questions about price discovery.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Without a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to assess if the $70.9M price is reasonable compared to market rates for similar retrofits.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer the best price.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for the GCS retrofit services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the sole-source nature of the contract. The long duration of the contract could indicate a critical or complex need for the Air Force. The specific nature of the 'GCS Retrofit' is unclear to the public, limiting understanding of the expenditure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a known defense contractor
- Supports Air Force operations
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Aircraft Manufacturing sector. Spending in this sector is often characterized by high R&D costs, long production cycles, and significant government oversight due to national security implications.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to a large business, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
Given the sole-source nature and cost-plus contract type, robust oversight from the Department of the Air Force is crucial to ensure cost control and prevent potential waste or fraud.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type increases risk of overspending.
- Long contract duration (2127 days) requires sustained oversight.
- Lack of transparency regarding specific retrofit details.
Tags
aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $70.9 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.. FY18 BLK 30 GCS RETROFIT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $70.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-09-21. End: 2024-07-18.
What specific components or systems does the GCS Retrofit entail, and what is the justification for a sole-source award?
The specific components of the GCS Retrofit are not detailed in the provided data. A sole-source award typically requires justification based on unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of viable alternatives. Without this justification, it's difficult to ascertain the necessity of awarding to a single vendor without competition.
What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract for this type of service?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts carry the risk of cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. If costs escalate beyond initial projections, the government pays more. This risk is amplified without competitive pressure to ensure efficient cost management and accurate initial pricing.
How will the effectiveness of the GCS Retrofit be measured given the lack of competitive benchmarks?
Effectiveness measurement will rely heavily on the performance metrics and deliverables defined within the contract itself. The Air Force must establish clear, objective criteria for success and diligently monitor the contractor's progress against these standards. Independent verification and validation will be key in the absence of competitive comparisons.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14200 KIRKHAM WAY, POWAY, CA, 92064
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $104,489,962
Exercised Options: $70,922,679
Current Obligation: $70,922,679
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 64
Total Subaward Amount: $13,404,463
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862015G4040
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-09-21
Current End Date: 2024-07-18
Potential End Date: 2024-07-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-06-28
More Contracts from General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
- Requirement IS for the Procurement of Performance Based Logistics Support Services for the MQ-1C Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System — $1.9B (Department of Defense)
- Award of Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA) for FY 12 MQ-1C Gray Eagle Program of Record and Quick Reaction Capability Performance-Based Logistics Product Support — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- FY 13 Full Rate Production of the Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System and FY 12 Backfill Requirements — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- FY17 Gray Eagle Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Effort — $936.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $646.6M (Department of Defense)
View all General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)