DoD's $71M Global Hawk sensor integration contract awarded to Northrop Grumman without competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $71,049,735 ($71.0M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-10-02
End Date: 2025-07-01
Contract Duration: 2,829 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.1K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ACAT III, GLOBAL HAWK, MS-177 10-BAND INTEGRATION ITEMS
Place of Performance
Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92127
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $71.0 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: ACAT III, GLOBAL HAWK, MS-177 10-BAND INTEGRATION ITEMS Key points: 1. Value for money is difficult to assess due to the sole-source nature of the award. 2. Competition dynamics are absent, raising concerns about potential overpricing and reduced innovation. 3. Risk indicators include the lack of competitive bidding and the cost-plus contract type. 4. Performance context is tied to the Global Hawk program, a high-altitude surveillance platform. 5. Sector positioning is within the defense aerospace manufacturing industry, dominated by large contractors.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this $71 million contract is challenging given its sole-source award. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to determine if the pricing reflects fair market value or if alternative solutions could have been procured at a lower cost. The cost-plus incentive fee structure, while common in complex defense projects, can lead to cost overruns if not managed rigorously. Comparing this to similar integration efforts on other platforms is difficult without transparency into the specific technical requirements and associated costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning Northrop Grumman was the only bidder considered. This lack of competition typically occurs when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or intellectual property essential for the requirement. However, it limits the government's ability to explore alternative solutions and potentially secure more favorable pricing through a competitive process. The absence of multiple bids means price discovery is not driven by market forces.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may face higher costs due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without competing offers, the government cannot be assured it is receiving the best possible price for these integration services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force, which will receive enhanced sensor capabilities for its Global Hawk fleet. The services delivered involve the integration of MS-177 10-band sensors onto the Global Hawk platform, improving its intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, where the integration work will likely occur, but the operational impact is global, supporting military operations worldwide. Workforce implications include specialized engineering and technical roles within Northrop Grumman and potentially its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential for cost savings.
- Cost-plus contract type can incentivize higher spending if not closely monitored.
- Lack of transparency in sole-source justifications can obscure true value for money.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical integration may pose long-term supply chain risks.
Positive Signals
- Contract supports a critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platform for the DoD.
- Integration of advanced sensor technology aims to enhance military operational effectiveness.
- Northrop Grumman is an established defense contractor with experience in the Global Hawk program.
- The contract duration extends to mid-2025, indicating a planned, long-term integration effort.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense aerospace manufacturing sector, a segment characterized by high technological complexity, significant R&D investment, and long procurement cycles. The Global Hawk program itself represents a substantial investment in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology for ISR missions. Spending in this sector is heavily influenced by government defense budgets and geopolitical priorities. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the specialized nature of sensor integration, but overall UAV and sensor system procurements represent billions of dollars annually.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. Furthermore, the prime contractor, Northrop Grumman, is a large aerospace and defense company. While large prime contractors are often required to subcontract a portion of their work to small businesses, the specific subcontracting plan for this delivery order is not detailed here. The absence of a direct set-aside means small businesses are less likely to be the primary recipients of this specific award, though they may participate indirectly through subcontracts.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. As a sole-source award, scrutiny may be heightened to ensure fair and reasonable pricing and adherence to contract terms. Inspector General investigations could be initiated if fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected. Transparency is limited by the non-competitive nature, but contract modifications, performance reports, and payment data are typically subject to internal review and potentially public reporting through systems like FPDS.
Related Government Programs
- Global Hawk Unmanned Aircraft System
- Advanced ISR Sensor Development
- Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Oversight
- Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole Source Award
- Cost-Plus Contract Type
- Lack of Competition
- Potential for Cost Overruns
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, air-force, northrop-grumman, global-hawk, uas, sensor-integration, sole-source, cost-plus-incentive-fee, aircraft-manufacturing, california, acats-iii
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $71.0 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. ACAT III, GLOBAL HAWK, MS-177 10-BAND INTEGRATION ITEMS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $71.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-10-02. End: 2025-07-01.
What is Northrop Grumman's track record with the Global Hawk program and similar sensor integration projects?
Northrop Grumman is the prime contractor for the Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial System (UAS), possessing extensive experience with the platform's development, production, and sustainment. This includes integrating various payloads and sensors over the program's lifecycle. Their history with the Global Hawk suggests a deep understanding of its architecture and operational requirements. For similar sensor integration projects, Northrop Grumman has a broad portfolio across various defense platforms, leveraging their expertise in avionics, systems integration, and advanced sensor technologies. However, specific details on past integration projects comparable in scope and complexity to the MS-177 10-band integration, particularly regarding cost and performance metrics, are often proprietary or not publicly disclosed, making direct comparisons challenging.
How does the $71 million cost compare to similar sensor integration efforts on other DoD platforms?
Directly comparing the $71 million cost of this MS-177 10-band integration for the Global Hawk to similar efforts on other DoD platforms is difficult due to several factors. Firstly, this contract was sole-sourced, meaning competitive pricing benchmarks are absent. Secondly, the specific technical complexity, performance requirements, and the unique characteristics of the MS-177 sensor and the Global Hawk platform influence costs significantly. Thirdly, contract types (like Cost Plus Incentive Fee) and the duration of integration efforts vary widely. Generally, integrating advanced, multi-band sensors onto complex platforms like UAVs or aircraft is a costly endeavor, often running into tens of millions of dollars. Without detailed breakdowns of labor, materials, testing, and overhead specific to this contract and comparable ones, a precise value-for-money assessment relative to other programs remains elusive.
What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source, cost-plus contract?
The primary risks associated with this sole-source, Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract are twofold. Firstly, the sole-source nature eliminates competitive pressure, potentially leading to inflated costs and reduced incentive for Northrop Grumman to optimize pricing or explore cost-saving alternatives. The government may not be achieving the best possible value. Secondly, the CPIF contract type, while designed to incentivize performance and cost control, can still lead to cost overruns if the target costs are not well-defined or if scope creep occurs. The contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a share of any savings or overruns relative to target costs. This structure requires robust government oversight to manage expenditures effectively and ensure the contractor remains focused on achieving program objectives within reasonable cost parameters.
How effective is the Global Hawk platform with the MS-177 sensor integration likely to be for DoD's ISR mission?
The integration of the MS-177 10-band sensor onto the Global Hawk platform is expected to significantly enhance the Department of Defense's Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. The MS-177 is a highly advanced electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensor capable of capturing imagery across multiple spectral bands, providing detailed information in various atmospheric conditions and allowing for enhanced target detection, identification, and tracking. The Global Hawk's long endurance and high-altitude capabilities allow it to loiter over target areas for extended periods, providing persistent ISR coverage. Combining these attributes means the enhanced Global Hawk should offer superior situational awareness and actionable intelligence, supporting a wide range of military operations, from battlefield monitoring to strategic intelligence gathering, thereby increasing the overall effectiveness of the DoD's ISR mission.
What are the historical spending patterns for Global Hawk sensor integration or upgrades?
Historical spending patterns for the Global Hawk program, particularly concerning sensor integration and upgrades, have been substantial. The platform itself has undergone significant investment over its lifespan, including the development and integration of various sensor suites to meet evolving ISR requirements. Specific figures for individual sensor integration contracts can vary widely depending on the complexity and technology involved. For instance, earlier sensor integrations or modifications might have cost less than the current MS-177 10-band integration, which represents a significant technological advancement. Tracking precise historical spending requires analyzing numerous individual contracts and modifications over many years. However, it's evident that the DoD has consistently allocated significant funds to enhance the Global Hawk's sensor capabilities to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in modern warfare.
What is the potential impact of this contract on future competition for similar DoD sensor integration work?
This contract's sole-source award to Northrop Grumman could have a mixed impact on future competition for similar DoD sensor integration work. On one hand, it reinforces Northrop Grumman's position as a key provider for the Global Hawk platform, potentially making it difficult for competitors to break into this specific niche without significant investment or unique technological breakthroughs. On the other hand, the government's investment in integrating advanced capabilities like the MS-177 sensor could spur innovation across the industry. If the integration proves highly successful and demonstrates significant operational advantages, it might create demand for similar capabilities on other platforms, potentially opening doors for other companies to develop competing solutions. However, the precedent of sole-sourcing critical upgrades on established platforms can discourage new entrants if they perceive limited opportunities for competitive engagement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation
Address: 17066 GOLDENTOP RD, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92127
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $71,049,735
Exercised Options: $71,049,735
Current Obligation: $71,049,735
Actual Outlays: $1,815,168
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 666
Total Subaward Amount: $332,712,866
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862015D3009
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-10-02
Current End Date: 2025-07-01
Potential End Date: 2025-07-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-06-25
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)