DoD awards $393.6M for Global Hawk advance procurement, a sole-source contract with potential value concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $393,638,775 ($393.6M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-02-28

End Date: 2022-04-23

Contract Duration: 2,611 days

Daily Burn Rate: $150.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ACAT 1D, GLOBAL HAWK, LOT 11 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92127

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $393.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: ACAT 1D, GLOBAL HAWK, LOT 11 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT Key points: 1. The contract's sole-source nature raises questions about price competitiveness and potential overspending. 2. Lack of competition limits opportunities for innovative solutions and potentially higher quality at lower costs. 3. The long duration and cost-plus-fixed-fee structure may incentivize cost overruns. 4. Performance context is limited due to the advance procurement nature, focusing on future production rather than immediate delivery. 5. This contract falls within the aircraft manufacturing sector, a high-cost, technologically advanced industry. 6. The absence of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements may limit broader economic participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this advance procurement contract is challenging without comparable sole-source awards for similar systems. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while common for complex development, can lead to higher final costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed rigorously. The total obligated amount of $393.6 million for advance procurement suggests significant future production costs, making it crucial to assess whether this represents a fair price for the anticipated capabilities and production schedule.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, was considered. This approach is typically justified when a unique capability is required or when only one source possesses the necessary expertise or technology. However, the lack of competition means there was no opportunity for other manufacturers to bid, potentially leading to higher prices than if a competitive process had been employed.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure, which typically drives down costs and encourages efficiency.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense, which will receive advance procurement for the Global Hawk unmanned aerial system. This contract supports the continued production and sustainment of a critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platform. The geographic impact is primarily within California, where Northrop Grumman's operations are located. Workforce implications include the continued employment of skilled engineers, technicians, and manufacturing personnel involved in the Global Hawk program.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits price discovery and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
  • Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type can incentivize cost growth if not closely monitored.
  • Advance procurement nature means immediate value-for-money is not yet realized, relying on future production efficiency.
  • Lack of small business participation noted, potentially missing opportunities for economic inclusion.
  • Long contract duration (2611 days) increases exposure to market fluctuations and program changes.

Positive Signals

  • Supports a critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platform vital for national security.
  • Ensures continuity of production for a proven and advanced unmanned aerial system.
  • Contract awarded to an established prime contractor with a track record in aerospace manufacturing.
  • Advance procurement allows for long-lead item acquisition, potentially streamlining future production.

Sector Analysis

The Global Hawk program operates within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on unmanned aerial systems (UAS). This sector is characterized by high research and development costs, complex manufacturing processes, and significant government investment. The market for advanced ISR platforms is dominated by a few large defense contractors. Comparable spending benchmarks for advance procurement of major defense systems can vary widely, but significant multi-million dollar awards are typical for programs of this scale.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to include specific small business set-aside provisions, nor is there explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. As a sole-source award to a large prime contractor, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Northrop Grumman voluntarily includes small businesses in its supply chain. This could represent a missed opportunity to leverage the innovation and agility of smaller firms within the defense industrial base.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure necessitates rigorous financial oversight to control costs and prevent overruns. Transparency is facilitated through contract reporting mechanisms, though specific details on ongoing oversight activities and Inspector General involvement would require deeper investigation into the contract's administration.

Related Government Programs

  • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Procurement
  • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Platforms
  • Northrop Grumman Defense Contracts
  • Department of Defense Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Long-Duration Defense Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type
  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Advance procurement risks

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, northrop-grumman, global-hawk, aircraft-manufacturing, unmanned-aerial-system, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, advance-procurement, california, intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $393.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. ACAT 1D, GLOBAL HAWK, LOT 11 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $393.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-02-28. End: 2022-04-23.

What is Northrop Grumman's track record with the Global Hawk program and similar sole-source contracts?

Northrop Grumman has been the prime contractor for the Global Hawk program since its inception, developing and producing the aircraft. Their extensive experience with this specific platform suggests a deep understanding of its technical requirements and production processes. Regarding sole-source contracts, defense contractors often engage in such agreements for specialized systems where they hold unique intellectual property or manufacturing capabilities. While this can ensure program continuity, it also necessitates robust government oversight to ensure fair pricing and prevent potential inefficiencies. Northrop Grumman's history with the Global Hawk indicates a strong performance record in delivering the system, but the financial aspects of sole-source awards always warrant scrutiny regarding value for money compared to competitive alternatives.

How does the $393.6 million advance procurement cost compare to historical spending on the Global Hawk program?

The $393.6 million awarded for advance procurement represents a significant investment, but placing it in historical context requires examining the total lifecycle costs and annual spending patterns of the Global Hawk program. Advance procurement funds are typically allocated to secure long-lead time materials and components necessary for future production runs. Without access to detailed historical spending data broken down by fiscal year and contract type for the Global Hawk, a direct comparison is difficult. However, this figure suggests a substantial commitment to maintaining or expanding the Global Hawk fleet. It is crucial to analyze this amount against the program's overall budget and production schedule to determine if it aligns with projected needs and represents efficient use of taxpayer funds for future capabilities.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for advance procurement?

The primary risks associated with this contract structure are multifaceted. Firstly, the sole-source nature eliminates competitive pressure, potentially leading to inflated prices and reduced incentive for cost efficiency. The contractor may not feel compelled to seek the most economical solutions when there are no competing bids. Secondly, the Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) structure, while providing flexibility for evolving requirements, can incentivize cost growth. The contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee, which could lead to higher overall expenditures if cost controls are not stringent. For advance procurement, there's also the risk that the anticipated future production may be delayed, canceled, or significantly altered, potentially rendering the advance investment less valuable or requiring costly adjustments. Effective risk mitigation relies heavily on robust government oversight, detailed cost analysis, and clear performance metrics.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the Global Hawk program's operational readiness and future capabilities?

This advance procurement contract is intended to ensure the continued availability of critical components and materials, thereby supporting the ongoing production and sustainment of the Global Hawk fleet. By securing these long-lead items, the Department of Defense aims to maintain production momentum and avoid potential delays in future aircraft delivery or upgrades. This, in turn, is expected to bolster the program's operational readiness by ensuring a steady supply of platforms for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. Furthermore, advance procurement can facilitate the integration of new technologies or modifications into future production runs, thereby enhancing the Global Hawk's capabilities over time. The ultimate impact hinges on the efficient execution of the contract and the alignment of procured assets with evolving defense requirements.

Are there any specific performance metrics or milestones tied to this advance procurement contract?

Advance procurement contracts, particularly those structured as sole-source and CPFF, often focus on the timely acquisition of long-lead materials and components rather than the delivery of finished end-items. Therefore, specific performance metrics might be tied to the contractor's ability to secure these materials within budget and schedule, meet quality specifications, and provide accurate cost reporting. Milestones would likely relate to the successful procurement and delivery of key sub-assemblies or raw materials required for future production phases. While the contract itself may not detail operational performance of the aircraft, the government's oversight agency (DCMA) would monitor the contractor's adherence to the agreed-upon terms, including cost controls and delivery schedules for the procured items. Detailed performance metrics are typically found within the contract's statement of work and associated appendices.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation

Address: 17066 GOLDENTOP RD, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92127

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $394,770,775

Exercised Options: $394,770,775

Current Obligation: $393,638,775

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 44

Total Subaward Amount: $14,641,448

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-02-28

Current End Date: 2022-04-23

Potential End Date: 2022-04-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-09-27

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending