DoD awards $19.4M to Northrop Grumman for B-2 ACS integration, bypassing competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,356,768 ($19.4M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-11-16
End Date: 2026-04-01
Contract Duration: 867 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: B-2 ACS 4.0 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT OF EMD PHASE
Place of Performance
Location: PALMDALE, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 93550
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP for work described as: B-2 ACS 4.0 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT OF EMD PHASE Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about price discovery and potential overpayment. 2. The contract focuses on integration and support for the B-2 ACS EMD phase, a critical but potentially high-risk area. 3. Limited competition suggests a lack of market pressure to drive down costs for this specialized service. 4. The duration of the contract (over 2.5 years) indicates a significant, long-term commitment to this specific system. 5. Northrop Grumman's established role with the B-2 program likely influenced the sole-source award. 6. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure may incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this sole-source contract is challenging due to the lack of competitive bids. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while common for complex R&D, carries inherent risks of cost escalation. Without comparable contract data or competitive pricing, it's difficult to definitively assess if the $19.4 million represents a fair market value. The absence of competition means taxpayers are reliant on the contractor's cost reporting and the agency's oversight to ensure value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning the Department of Defense did not solicit bids from multiple offerors. This typically occurs when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or intellectual property essential for the requirement, or in cases of urgent need. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to achieve the best possible price and terms.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards mean taxpayers do not benefit from the price reductions and innovations that typically arise from a competitive bidding process. This can lead to higher overall costs for the government.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force and Northrop Grumman, involved in the B-2 bomber modernization. Services delivered include integration and support for the B-2 Advanced Conventional Standoff (ACS) EMD phase. The geographic impact is concentrated around defense contractor facilities, primarily in California where the awardee is located. Workforce implications include specialized engineering and technical roles within Northrop Grumman and potentially its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition and potential taxpayer savings.
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type can incentivize cost overruns if not rigorously managed.
- Lack of transparency in pricing due to non-competitive nature.
- Potential for vendor lock-in given the specialized nature of B-2 system integration.
Positive Signals
- Awardee has established expertise with the B-2 platform, suggesting technical proficiency.
- Contract supports a critical modernization effort for a key strategic asset.
- Fixed fee component provides some cost certainty compared to pure cost-plus contracts.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on aircraft manufacturing and system integration. The B-2 ACS EMD phase represents a niche but critical area of military aviation technology. Spending in this sector is characterized by high R&D costs, long development cycles, and significant government investment. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the unique nature of the B-2 platform and its modernization requirements, but large-scale defense system integration contracts often run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not competed and there is no indication of a small business set-aside. Northrop Grumman, the prime contractor, is a large aerospace and defense company. While large prime contractors are often required to subcontract a portion of their work to small businesses, the specific subcontracting plan for this award is not detailed here. The lack of competition may limit opportunities for small businesses that could have bid on specific components or services if the contract had been broken down and competed.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be primarily managed by the Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. As a sole-source award, scrutiny on cost reporting and performance metrics will be crucial. The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure necessitates robust auditing and monitoring to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. Transparency may be limited due to the non-competitive nature, but performance reviews and milestone tracking should provide some level of accountability.
Related Government Programs
- B-2 Bomber Modernization Programs
- Advanced Conventional Standoff (ACS) Weapon System
- Air Force Aircraft Systems Integration
- Defense Contractor Support Services
- Northrop Grumman Defense Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost-plus contract type
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Critical defense system modernization
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, northrop-grumman-systems-corp, b-2-bomber, aircraft-manufacturing, integration-support, emd-phase, cost-plus-fixed-fee, sole-source, california, non-competed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP. B-2 ACS 4.0 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT OF EMD PHASE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-11-16. End: 2026-04-01.
What is the specific nature of the B-2 ACS EMD phase integration and support being provided?
The B-2 Advanced Conventional Standoff (ACS) EMD phase refers to the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase for an upgrade or new capability intended for the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber. Integration and support in this context likely involve complex tasks such as incorporating new avionics, software, weapon systems, or communication technologies into the B-2 airframe. This could include system design, prototyping, testing, verification, and validation activities to ensure the new capabilities function correctly and reliably with the existing platform. The 'support' aspect may also encompass technical documentation, training development, and initial fielding assistance.
Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis instead of being competed?
Sole-source awards are typically justified under specific circumstances outlined in federal acquisition regulations, such as when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. For a program like the B-2 ACS EMD phase, the justification might stem from Northrop Grumman's unique knowledge of the B-2 platform, proprietary technology, existing infrastructure, or specialized expertise developed through prior work on the aircraft. The government may have determined that initiating a competitive process would be impractical, excessively costly, or would cause unacceptable delays in a critical modernization effort. However, the specific justification document for this award would provide the definitive reasons.
What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for this type of work?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts, while offering flexibility for research and development or uncertain scope, carry inherent risks. The primary risk is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts, as the government agrees to pay all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. If the contractor's costs exceed initial estimates, the government bears the burden, potentially leading to budget overruns. The fixed fee, however, provides the contractor with a guaranteed profit margin regardless of cost fluctuations. Effective oversight, rigorous cost auditing, and clear performance metrics are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure value for the government.
How does Northrop Grumman's track record with the B-2 program influence this award?
Northrop Grumman has been the prime contractor for the B-2 Spirit bomber program since its inception. This long-standing relationship means they possess deep institutional knowledge, proprietary data, and established manufacturing and integration capabilities specific to the B-2 platform. Their historical performance, including previous upgrades and sustainment efforts, likely demonstrated their technical proficiency and ability to manage complex aspects of the aircraft. This extensive track record is a significant factor in justifying a sole-source award, as it suggests they are uniquely positioned to execute the B-2 ACS EMD phase effectively and efficiently compared to potential new entrants.
What is the historical spending trend for B-2 modernization or related integration efforts?
Historical spending on B-2 modernization and integration efforts has been substantial, reflecting the complexity and strategic importance of the platform. While specific figures for the ACS EMD phase prior to this award are not provided, the B-2 program itself has involved tens of billions of dollars in development, production, and sustainment over its lifecycle. Modernization programs for aging strategic assets like the B-2 often involve significant, multi-year investments in avionics, software, and weapon system upgrades. Annual spending can fluctuate based on program phase, but typically ranges from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars for major upgrade initiatives within the defense sector.
What are the potential implications of this contract on future B-2 sustainment and upgrades?
This contract for the B-2 ACS EMD phase is likely a foundational step for future sustainment and upgrades. Successful integration and development during this phase will pave the way for broader implementation and potential follow-on production contracts. Northrop Grumman's role here solidifies their position as the incumbent and likely future provider for subsequent B-2 modernization efforts. This could lead to continued sole-source or limited-competition awards for related work, potentially impacting the long-term cost structure and competitive landscape for maintaining and enhancing the B-2 fleet.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation
Address: 3520 E AVE M, PALMDALE, CA, 93550
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,356,768
Exercised Options: $19,356,768
Current Obligation: $19,356,768
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 4
Total Subaward Amount: $545,369
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA861614D6060
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-11-16
Current End Date: 2026-04-01
Potential End Date: 2026-04-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-23
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corp
- Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (gbsd) Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) and Early Production and Deployment (P&D) — $11.7B (Department of Defense)
- Acat 1D B-2 Dms-M EMD — $863.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200411!000088!5700!GU22 !asc/Ysk !F3365799D0028 !A!N! !N!0023 ! !20040827!20081230!362686958!008255408!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Systems Corpo!3520 East Avenue M !palmdale !ca!93550!55156!037!06!palmdale !LOS Angeles !california!+000000400000!n!n!000000000000!ac65!rdte/Electronics&communication Eq-Eng/Manuf DEV !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !376 !B-2 RMP !336411!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!d!n!r!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $542.1M (Department of Defense)
- Acat 1, B2 UCA for DMS TD Phase 2 — $536.3M (Department of Defense)
- Enhanced Polar System Recapitalization - TWO Payloads (P6&P7) — $472.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)