DoD Awards $1.3B to Boeing for KC-46A Aircraft Manufacturing, Delivery Order Under Existing Contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,305,571,332 ($1.3B)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-12-22

End Date: 2025-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,747 days

Daily Burn Rate: $475.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: JAPAN KC-46A

Place of Performance

Location: TUKWILA, KING County, WASHINGTON, 98108

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $1.31 billion to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: JAPAN KC-46A Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $1.3 billion for aircraft manufacturing. 2. Sole-source award to The Boeing Company, raising competition concerns. 3. Long contract duration (2017-2025) suggests ongoing program needs. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $1.3 billion award is a substantial amount for aircraft manufacturing. Benchmarking against similar large-scale defense aircraft contracts is difficult without more specific details on the KC-46A variant and scope. The firm fixed price structure provides some cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This approach may limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to a fully competed contract. The award is a delivery order under an existing contract.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could result in taxpayers paying a premium for the KC-46A aircraft. However, the firm fixed price contract aims to mitigate cost overruns.

Public Impact

Impacts Air Force readiness and refueling capabilities. Supports a major defense contractor, The Boeing Company. Long-term program with implications for future defense spending. Potential for follow-on contracts and sustainment services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • High contract value
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Firm Fixed Price contract type
  • Delivery order under existing contract

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically Aircraft Manufacturing. Defense spending on major platforms like refueling tankers is a significant portion of the federal budget. Benchmarks for similar large aircraft programs are often in the billions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the award went to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no explicit information on small business participation in this specific delivery order. Large defense contracts often involve complex subcontracting, but direct small business awards are not evident here.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is a delivery order under an existing contract, suggesting some level of prior oversight. However, the sole-source nature warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and value for taxpayer dollars. Further oversight would focus on performance and adherence to the fixed price.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to sole-source nature
  • Long contract duration may not reflect evolving needs
  • Limited transparency on specific aircraft configuration and pricing breakdown

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, wa, delivery-order, billion-dollar

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $1.31 billion to THE BOEING COMPANY. JAPAN KC-46A

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.31 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-12-22. End: 2025-06-30.

What is the specific justification for the sole-source award of this significant delivery order for the KC-46A aircraft?

The justification for a sole-source award typically relates to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or the need for compatibility with existing systems where only one source can meet the requirement. For the KC-46A, this could stem from its development as a derivative of a specific commercial aircraft or unique military modifications that only Boeing possesses.

How does the firm fixed price structure on this $1.3 billion delivery order ensure cost-effectiveness given the lack of competition?

While a firm fixed price (FFP) contract aims to shift cost risk to the contractor, its effectiveness in ensuring cost-effectiveness without competition is limited. The government relies on the contractor's proposed price, which may not be as competitive as in a solicited bid. Oversight is crucial to ensure the proposed costs are reasonable and reflect the FFP's intent.

What are the long-term implications of this substantial, non-competed award for the future development and acquisition of aerial refueling capabilities?

This non-competed award for a significant portion of the KC-46A program could set a precedent for future acquisitions, potentially reducing competitive opportunities for alternative refueling solutions or upgrades. It reinforces reliance on Boeing for this capability, which may impact long-term strategic sourcing and innovation within the Air Force's tanker fleet.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7755 E MARGINAL WAY S, SEATTLE, WA, 98108

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,480,283,837

Exercised Options: $1,305,571,332

Current Obligation: $1,305,571,332

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 118

Total Subaward Amount: $42,789,032

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA860918G0002

IDV Type: BOA

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-12-22

Current End Date: 2025-06-30

Potential End Date: 2025-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-10-24

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending