HII Mission Technologies Corp. awarded $12.8M for Air Force Research Lab support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,865,692 ($12.9M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-10-06

End Date: 2010-09-17

Contract Duration: 1,442 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: R&D

Official Description: HQ AFRL SBIR A&AS

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45430

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.9 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: HQ AFRL SBIR A&AS Key points: 1. Contract provides essential analytical and administrative support services. 2. Services are critical for the Air Force Research Laboratory's mission. 3. Contract duration spans nearly four years. 4. Awarded under full and open competition. 5. Geographic focus on Ohio. 6. Contract type is labor hours, indicating flexibility in service delivery.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.8 million over approximately four years for analytical and administrative support appears moderate for a Department of Defense contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized research support services is challenging without more granular data on the specific tasks performed. However, the labor hours contract type suggests that the final cost could fluctuate based on actual hours worked, which introduces some variability in value assessment. The absence of specific performance metrics makes a definitive value-for-money assessment difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 5 bids suggests a reasonable level of competition for these specialized services. A competitive process generally helps in price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition likely resulted in a more competitive price for taxpayers by allowing multiple companies to bid on the contract.

Public Impact

Benefits the Air Force Research Laboratory by providing essential support services. Services likely contribute to the advancement of research and development initiatives. Geographic impact is concentrated in Ohio, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include employment for individuals with analytical and administrative skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness.
Labor hours contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
Limited public information on the specific nature of the analytical and administrative support provided.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Contractor has a track record with the Department of Defense.
Services directly support a critical research and development function within the Air Force.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting research and development activities for the Department of the Air Force. The market for such services is characterized by specialized expertise and often involves long-term relationships with government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader category of professional, scientific, and technical services awarded by defense agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless HII Mission Technologies Corp. voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are usually tied to contract performance requirements and deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational specifics may be limited due to security or proprietary concerns. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Contracts
Department of Defense Professional Services
Engineering and Technical Services
Research and Development Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to labor hours contract type.
Limited transparency on specific service deliverables.
Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.9 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. HQ AFRL SBIR A&AS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-10-06. End: 2010-09-17.

What specific analytical and administrative tasks are encompassed by this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific analytical and administrative tasks. However, given the context of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), these services likely involve supporting research projects, managing data, preparing reports, facilitating communication, and potentially assisting with administrative functions related to scientific and engineering endeavors. The 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330) classification suggests a focus on technical and engineering support rather than purely administrative functions. Further details would typically be found in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) associated with the contract.

How does the $12.8 million contract value compare to similar AFRL support contracts?

Direct comparison of the $12.8 million value to similar AFRL support contracts is difficult without access to a comprehensive database of AFRL procurements with detailed taskings and durations. However, for a contract spanning nearly four years (1442 days) and involving specialized analytical and administrative support for a major research laboratory, this value appears within a reasonable range. Contracts for R&D support can vary significantly based on the scope, complexity, and duration of the services required. The number of bids (5) suggests it was a competitive procurement, which typically helps in achieving a fair market price.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of 'labor hours' contract?

The primary risk associated with a 'labor hours' contract is cost control. Unlike fixed-price contracts, the government pays for the actual hours worked by contractor personnel at pre-negotiated hourly rates. This can lead to cost overruns if the contractor's efficiency is lower than anticipated, if the scope of work expands without proper modification, or if the estimated hours are inaccurate. Effective oversight, detailed tracking of hours, and clear performance standards are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value.

What is the significance of the 'OH' (Ohio) designation for the contract's place of performance?

The 'OH' designation indicates that the primary place of performance for this contract is expected to be in Ohio. This has implications for local economic impact, potential for on-site government oversight, and the geographic distribution of federal spending. For HII Mission Technologies Corp., it suggests a significant operational presence or facility in Ohio to fulfill the contract requirements. It also means that jobs and economic activity related to this contract are likely to be generated within the state of Ohio.

What does the 'DO' award type signify?

The 'DO' award type typically signifies a 'Delivery Order' placed against an existing indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar type of basic ordering agreement. This means that while the overall framework and terms were likely established previously, this specific $12.8 million award represents a defined task or period of performance under that larger agreement. It implies that HII Mission Technologies Corp. was likely an incumbent or pre-qualified vendor under a prior contract vehicle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4021 EXECUTIVE DR, DAYTON, OH, 10

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,392,645

Exercised Options: $22,392,645

Current Obligation: $12,865,692

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0127K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline