DoD Awards Northrop Grumman $30.8M Contract for Management Consulting Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,821,040 ($30.8M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-04-20
End Date: 2010-01-31
Contract Duration: 2,112 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: TAS::57 3400::TAS 200407!000520!5700!GC20 !ASC/PKWO !GS23F9797H !C!N! !Y!FA860104F0043! !20040420!20050419!064677243!016435559!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION T!7575 COLSHIRE DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREENE !OHIO !+000000243000!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.8 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: TAS::57 3400::TAS 200407!000520!5700!GC20 !ASC/PKWO !GS23F9797H !C!N! !Y!FA860104F0043! !20040420!20050419!064677243!016435559!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION T!7575 COLSHIRE DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!86660!057!39!WRIGHT… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Northrop Grumman for administrative management and general management consulting. 2. The contract value is $30.8 million, with a duration of 2112 days. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The services are categorized under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 5. The contract was issued as a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $30.8 million for management consulting services appears reasonable given the 2112-day duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is beneficial for taxpayers, likely resulting in a fair market price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Supports critical administrative and management functions within the Department of Defense. Ensures specialized consulting expertise is available to the Air Force. The long duration suggests ongoing, essential support requirements. Potential for follow-on work or expansion based on performance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
- Potential for scope creep in long-term consulting contracts.
- Reliance on a single contractor for extended periods.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Clear categorization of services provided.
- Established contractor with a history of government work.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area is common across government agencies for specialized expertise.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The prime contractor is a large corporation, suggesting limited direct opportunities for small businesses unless they are subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, implying oversight from this agency. Further details on performance monitoring and accountability mechanisms would be needed for a full assessment.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term service contracts.
- Limited visibility into subcontractor utilization.
- Dependency on a single vendor for critical services.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, oh, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.8 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. TAS::57 3400::TAS 200407!000520!5700!GC20 !ASC/PKWO !GS23F9797H !C!N! !Y!FA860104F0043! !20040420!20050419!064677243!016435559!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION T!7575 COLSHIRE DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREENE !OHIO !+000000243000!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541618!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-04-20. End: 2010-01-31.
What specific management consulting services are being provided under this contract, and how do they align with the Air Force's strategic objectives?
The contract specifies 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611). While the exact deliverables are not detailed, these services typically involve improving organizational efficiency, strategic planning, process optimization, and management support. The alignment with Air Force objectives would depend on the specific tasks outlined in the Statement of Work, which is not provided here but is crucial for understanding the contract's strategic value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of Northrop Grumman's consulting services, and what has been their performance against these KPIs?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance reports for this contract. Effective oversight would require defined metrics related to efficiency gains, cost savings, or successful implementation of recommendations. Without this information, assessing the contractor's effectiveness and the true value delivered to the Air Force is challenging.
How does the $30.8 million contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar management consulting services over a 2112-day period, considering the scope and complexity?
Benchmarking this $30.8 million contract requires detailed comparison with similar contracts for administrative and general management consulting services, factoring in duration, scope, and the specific agency's needs. While the contract was competitively awarded, a precise assessment of value for money would necessitate access to detailed cost breakdowns and market research data on prevailing rates for comparable services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation (UEI: 967356127)
Address: 13825 SUNRISE VALLEY DR, HERNDON, VA, 20171
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F9797H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-04-20
Current End Date: 2010-01-31
Potential End Date: 2010-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-12-07
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)