DoD awards $13.5M for Tunner Loader Support to DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. with no competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,463,787 ($13.5M)
Contractor: DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-11-22
End Date: 2029-11-21
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: TUNNER LOADER SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: BRIDGETON, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63044
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC for work described as: TUNNER LOADER SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor suggests potential for higher costs and limited innovation. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price reasonableness and value for taxpayer dollars. 3. The fixed-price incentive contract type may incentivize cost control but requires careful monitoring. 4. Long contract duration of five years could lock in pricing, potentially missing market shifts. 5. The industrial truck and stacker machinery sector is mature, making competition more expected. 6. Performance risk appears moderate given the nature of sustainment support.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the lack of competitive bids. Without comparison to other offers, it's difficult to ascertain if the $13.5 million price represents a fair market value. The fixed-price incentive structure aims to control costs, but the absence of competition means the government cannot leverage multiple bids to drive down the price. This award warrants scrutiny to ensure the government is not overpaying for the sustainment services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning no other vendors were solicited or considered. This significantly limits price discovery and the government's ability to negotiate the best possible terms. The lack of a competitive process raises questions about whether alternative solutions or more cost-effective options were overlooked. Transparency in the justification for this sole-source award is crucial.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards mean taxpayers may not be receiving the most competitive pricing available in the market, potentially leading to higher overall expenditure for essential services.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from continued operational readiness of its Tunner loaders. DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. will provide critical support services, ensuring equipment functionality. The contract's geographic impact is primarily within the continental United States where DoD assets are deployed. Workforce implications include continued employment for technicians and support staff at DRS Sustainment Systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to inflated pricing.
- Sole-source award limits opportunities for other capable vendors.
- Long-term contract may not adapt to future technological advancements.
- Fixed-price incentive requires careful oversight to ensure contractor efficiency.
Positive Signals
- DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. is an established provider of defense sustainment.
- The contract type aims to align contractor and government interests on cost.
- The award ensures continued availability of critical equipment support.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the industrial machinery manufacturing and support sector, specifically focusing on heavy equipment sustainment. The market for specialized defense equipment support is often characterized by a limited number of highly qualified contractors. While the overall industrial truck and stacker machinery market is broad, niche defense sustainment contracts like this one tend to have fewer competitive opportunities, sometimes leading to sole-source or limited competition awards.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication of a small business set-aside for this contract, nor are there explicit subcontracting requirements mentioned. The award to DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc., a large business, suggests that small businesses are unlikely to be direct beneficiaries of this prime contract. Opportunities for small businesses would likely be through subcontracting, if DRS chooses to engage them.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. The fixed-price incentive structure necessitates diligent monitoring of costs and performance metrics to ensure the government receives value. Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award and ongoing performance reports will be key accountability measures.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Equipment Support
- Army Sustainment Command
- Marine Corps Logistics Command
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Potential for price inflation
- Limited market visibility
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, drs-sustainment-systems-inc, tunner-loader-support, fixed-price-incentive, sole-source, ground-support-equipment, missouri, industrial-truck-tractor-trailer-and-stacker-machinery-manufacturing, sustainment, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC. TUNNER LOADER SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-11-22. End: 2029-11-21.
What is the historical spending pattern for Tunner Loader support by the Department of Defense?
Analyzing historical spending for Tunner Loader support is crucial for understanding the long-term investment in this equipment. Without specific historical data for this exact contract vehicle, we can infer trends from similar sustainment contracts. Typically, sustainment costs can represent a significant portion of a platform's total lifecycle cost. Fluctuations in spending may be driven by operational tempo, equipment age, and modernization efforts. A detailed review of past solicitations and awards for Tunner Loader support, or comparable ground support equipment, would reveal if this $13.5 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment compared to previous periods. Understanding these patterns helps assess the current award's financial context and potential future budgetary needs.
What specific sustainment services are included under this contract?
The contract specifies 'TUNNER LOADER SUPPORT,' which broadly encompasses maintenance, repair, and operational readiness services for Tunner loaders. This likely includes scheduled preventative maintenance, unscheduled repairs, parts replacement, technical support, and potentially depot-level maintenance. The exact scope of services would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). These services are critical for ensuring the availability and reliability of ground support equipment essential for military operations, particularly in logistics and cargo handling. The duration of the contract (five years) suggests a comprehensive, long-term support arrangement rather than ad-hoc repairs.
What is the track record of DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. with similar DoD contracts?
DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. has a significant track record supporting the Department of Defense with various sustainment and logistics services. They are known for providing maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) for a range of military equipment, including ground support equipment, vehicles, and aircraft components. Their experience often involves complex systems requiring specialized technical expertise and adherence to stringent military standards. While specific performance metrics for past contracts are not detailed here, their continued awards suggest a generally satisfactory performance history with the DoD. However, a deeper dive into past performance reviews and any past performance issues would provide a more complete picture of their reliability for this specific Tunner Loader support contract.
How does the fixed-price incentive (FPI) contract type function in this context?
A Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) contract is designed to share the risks and rewards of cost performance between the government and the contractor. In this case, there's an established target cost and target profit. If the contractor completes the work for less than the target cost, both the government and contractor share in the savings according to a pre-negotiated formula. Conversely, if costs exceed the target, both parties share in the overrun, up to a negotiated ceiling price. This structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs while ensuring the government doesn't face unlimited cost increases. Effective administration requires close monitoring of the contractor's cost accounting and performance against the target.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for sustainment services?
The primary risk of a sole-source award for sustainment services is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competition. Without competing bids, the government loses the leverage to negotiate the best possible price. This can lead to higher costs for taxpayers over the contract's duration. Additionally, sole-source awards can stifle innovation, as there's less pressure on the incumbent contractor to improve services or adopt more cost-effective methods. There's also a risk that the contractor may become complacent, knowing they are the only option. Ensuring robust oversight and performance management becomes even more critical in sole-source situations to mitigate these risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing › Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leonardo SPA
Address: 4201 INNOVATION WAY, BRIDGETON, MO, 63044
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,463,787
Exercised Options: $13,463,787
Current Obligation: $13,463,787
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 7
Total Subaward Amount: $383,747
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA853425D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-11-22
Current End Date: 2029-11-21
Potential End Date: 2029-11-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-17
More Contracts from DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc
- THE Purpose of This NEW Undefinitized Contract IS to Procure 146 Each Abrams Active Protection Systems, 826 Each Abrams Countermeasures, and 27 Kits of the Abrams Calibration/Maintenance Kits for the Department of the Army and the United States Marine Corps — $431.6M (Department of Defense)
- LOW Rate Initial Production/Full Rate Production for the Joint Assault Bridge — $397.7M (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of 274 Each M1000 Trailers — $104.8M (Department of Defense)
- This Task Order IS for Capability Development Document Increment-1, Procurement of 10 Configuration B Vehicles and Associated Spares — $103.3M (Department of Defense)
- M1200 Service Technical Support — $100.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)