DoD's $273M JSTARS E-8C Support Contract Awarded to Northrop Grumman

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $273,085,889 ($273.1M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-11-01

End Date: 2023-05-31

Contract Duration: 941 days

Daily Burn Rate: $290.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: JSTARS PROGRAM SUPPORT OF THE E-8C

Place of Performance

Location: MELBOURNE, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32904

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $273.1 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: JSTARS PROGRAM SUPPORT OF THE E-8C Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized engineering services. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about competition and potential cost savings. 3. Risk of vendor lock-in and limited market competition. 4. Focus on critical defense intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar specialized engineering services is difficult without more data on the specific tasks performed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Without competition, taxpayers may be paying a premium for these essential engineering services, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operational readiness of the E-8C JSTARS fleet. Supports critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions for national security. Potential for cost inefficiencies due to sole-source nature.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Engineering Services, a broad category. Defense sector spending on specialized ISR platforms like JSTARS is substantial, often involving complex, long-term support contracts.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation and does not indicate any subcontracting to small businesses. This represents a missed opportunity for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. DoD should provide justification for the lack of competition.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $273.1 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. JSTARS PROGRAM SUPPORT OF THE E-8C

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $273.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-11-01. End: 2023-05-31.

What specific engineering services are included in this contract, and how do they contribute to the JSTARS platform's effectiveness?

This contract covers a range of engineering services essential for the JSTARS E-8C aircraft, including systems engineering, software development, and sustainment support. These services are critical for maintaining the platform's intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities, ensuring its readiness for complex military operations and providing vital battlefield information.

What are the primary risks associated with awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The primary risks of a sole-source award include a lack of competitive pricing, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers. It also reduces the incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, as there is no direct competition. Furthermore, it can create vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers or negotiate better terms in the future.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type impact the overall value and accountability for this expenditure?

The CPFF structure aims to provide a degree of cost certainty by capping the contractor's fee, but it still allows for the reimbursement of actual costs incurred. This can incentivize cost overruns if not rigorously monitored. Accountability relies heavily on the government's ability to audit costs and ensure that only reasonable and necessary expenses are reimbursed, which can be challenging with complex engineering services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation

Address: 2000 W NASA BLVD, MELBOURNE, FL, 32902

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $502,873,516

Exercised Options: $502,873,516

Current Obligation: $273,085,889

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 360

Total Subaward Amount: $139,196,442

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F0960300D0210

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-11-01

Current End Date: 2023-05-31

Potential End Date: 2023-05-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-08

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending