DoD Awards Raytheon $31.6M for ASARS-2 Sensor Engineering, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,580,752 ($31.6M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-11-01

End Date: 2022-08-30

Contract Duration: 667 days

Daily Burn Rate: $47.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SUPPORT SUSTAINMENT OF THE ADVANCED SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR SYSTEM (ASARS-2) SENSOR

Place of Performance

Location: EL SEGUNDO, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90245

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $31.6 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SUPPORT SUSTAINMENT OF THE ADVANCED SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR SYSTEM (ASARS-2) SENSOR Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized engineering services. 2. Sole reliance on Raytheon raises concerns about competitive pricing. 3. Potential for cost overruns due to cost-plus contract type. 4. Focus on critical defense technology (ASARS-2 sensor).

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $31.6 million award for specialized engineering services appears high given the lack of competition. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the pricing reflects fair market value compared to similar specialized engineering contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition likely results in taxpayers paying a premium for these essential engineering services.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation of a critical advanced radar system. Supports national defense capabilities through sensor maintenance. Potential for taxpayer funds to be used inefficiently due to sole-source award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Lack of transparency in pricing

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical defense technology
  • Ensures system sustainment

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting advanced defense systems. Benchmarks for similar specialized engineering services are hard to establish due to the unique nature of the ASARS-2 system and the sole-source award.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to a small business. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure the contractor is performing efficiently and that costs are reasonable. Accountability for pricing should be a key focus.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
  • Cost-plus contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns.
  • Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-sourcing.
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to absence of competitive pressure.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $31.6 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SUPPORT SUSTAINMENT OF THE ADVANCED SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR SYSTEM (ASARS-2) SENSOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-11-01. End: 2022-08-30.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were any attempts made to explore competitive options?

The justification for a sole-source award typically stems from unique capabilities or proprietary technology held by a single vendor. While the data doesn't specify the exact reason, further investigation into the necessity of this exclusivity is crucial. Exploring alternative solutions or phased competitions could potentially yield better value in the future, even for highly specialized systems.

How are costs being controlled under the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure for this specialized service?

Under a CPFF contract, the government reimburses the contractor's allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. Effective cost control relies on robust government oversight of incurred costs, clear definition of 'allowable costs,' and negotiation of a reasonable fixed fee. Regular audits and performance reviews are essential to prevent cost overruns and ensure value.

What is the long-term strategy for ensuring competitive sourcing for future sustainment of the ASARS-2 system?

The long-term strategy should involve market research to identify potential competitors or develop alternative solutions. If Raytheon's technology remains unique, the government could explore options like incentivizing Raytheon to share technical data or developing in-house capabilities. Planning for future competitions, even if phased, is vital to avoid perpetual sole-source reliance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp

Address: 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $32,337,223

Exercised Options: $31,580,752

Current Obligation: $31,580,752

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 10

Total Subaward Amount: $642,679

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA852820D0023

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-11-01

Current End Date: 2022-08-30

Potential End Date: 2022-08-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-08-12

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending