DoD Awards $94M Contract to Goodrich for ISR Management, Raising Oversight Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,424,281 ($19.4M)

Contractor: Goodrich Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-03-22

End Date: 2010-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,531 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200606!000073!5700!FA8527!WR-ALC-LXKA ISR MGNT DIR !FA852706C0008 !A!N! !N! ! !20060322!20071219!939743829!939743829!004467452!N!GOODRICH CORPORATION !5 OMNI WAY !CHELMSFORD !MA!01824!13100!017!25!CHELMSFORD !MIDDLESEX !MASS !+000006227660!N!N!000000000000!5999!MISC ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !333314!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!D!N!N!Z!D!N!V!1!001!N!6A!A!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WESTFORD, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01886

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to GOODRICH CORPORATION for work described as: 200606!000073!5700!FA8527!WR-ALC-LXKA ISR MGNT DIR !FA852706C0008 !A!N! !N! ! !20060322!20071219!939743829!939743829!004467452!N!GOODRICH CORPORATION !5 OMNI WAY !CHELMSFORD !MA!01824!13100!017!25!CHELMSFORD !MIDD… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Goodrich Corporation for ISR Management. 2. Significant taxpayer investment of $94 million. 3. Contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee, potentially leading to cost overruns. 4. Sector is Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing, a specialized area.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $94 million is substantial. Without specific benchmarks for ISR management systems, it's difficult to definitively assess value. However, the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure warrants scrutiny for potential inefficiencies.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for the government compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a $94 million contract raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible value.

Public Impact

Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities are critical for national security. The award to a single vendor may impact the development of broader ISR technologies. Transparency in the justification for a sole-source award is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type
  • Lack of transparency in justification for sole-source

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical ISR capabilities
  • Award to established defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing sector, which is vital for advanced defense systems. Spending in this sector is often characterized by high R&D costs and specialized production.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Goodrich Corporation, a large business. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this large contract necessitates robust oversight to ensure cost control and performance. The government should actively monitor expenditures and deliverables.

Related Government Programs

  • Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to CPIF structure
  • Lack of competitive bidding limits price discovery
  • Limited transparency on sole-source justification
  • Potential for contractor inefficiency without strong oversight

Tags

optical-instrument-and-lens-manufacturin, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to GOODRICH CORPORATION. 200606!000073!5700!FA8527!WR-ALC-LXKA ISR MGNT DIR !FA852706C0008 !A!N! !N! ! !20060322!20071219!939743829!939743829!004467452!N!GOODRICH CORPORATION !5 OMNI WAY !CHELMSFORD !MA!01824!13100!017!25!CHELMSFORD !MIDDLESEX !MASS !+000006227660!N!N!000000000000!5999!MISC ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !333314!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOODRICH CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-22. End: 2010-05-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative solutions considered?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A sole-source award typically requires a detailed justification, such as a unique capability, urgent need, or lack of other responsible sources. Without this justification, it's impossible to assess if the government adequately explored competitive options or if this was the only viable path.

How will the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure be managed to prevent cost overruns and ensure contractor efficiency?

The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure allows the contractor to earn an incentive fee based on meeting or exceeding certain performance targets, often related to cost or schedule. Effective management requires clear, measurable targets, rigorous monitoring of costs, and transparent communication between the government and contractor to ensure the incentive aligns with government objectives and prevents unchecked spending.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this ISR Management contract, and how will their achievement be measured?

Key performance indicators for ISR management would likely include system uptime, data processing speed, accuracy of intelligence gathered, and responsiveness to operational needs. The government must establish clear, quantifiable KPIs and a robust system for tracking and verifying performance against these metrics throughout the contract duration to ensure the contractor is delivering the expected value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommercial and Service Industry Machinery ManufacturingOptical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC EQPT COMPNTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp (UEI: 001344142)

Address: 5 OMNI WAY, CHELMSFORD, MA, 01824

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-03-22

Current End Date: 2010-05-31

Potential End Date: 2010-05-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-08-03

More Contracts from Goodrich Corporation

View all Goodrich Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending