Boeing awarded $112.9M for C-17 sustainment, a sole-source contract for aircraft manufacturing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $112,910,432 ($112.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-04-16

End Date: 2024-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,359 days

Daily Burn Rate: $47.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: C-17 SUSTAINMENT

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTINGTON BEACH, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92647

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $112.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: C-17 SUSTAINMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single supplier, raising questions about price competitiveness. 2. Long-term sustainment contract indicates critical need for C-17 aircraft support. 3. Focus on aircraft manufacturing suggests potential for specialized technical expertise. 4. Contract duration of nearly two years highlights ongoing operational requirements. 5. Geographic location in California may influence labor costs and supply chain logistics.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's value of $112.9 million for C-17 sustainment is difficult to benchmark without comparable sole-source awards. As a sole-source contract, there is an inherent risk of overpayment due to a lack of competitive pressure. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the pricing reflects fair market value for the services provided, especially considering the specialized nature of aircraft sustainment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when only one vendor possesses the necessary capabilities or when urgency dictates a rapid award. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was bypassed, potentially leading to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium for this aircraft sustainment due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without competing offers, it is harder to ensure the most cost-effective solution was secured.

Public Impact

The U.S. Department of Defense benefits from the continued operational readiness of its C-17 fleet. Services delivered include essential maintenance, repair, and logistical support for C-17 aircraft. The contract's impact is primarily felt within the defense sector, ensuring air mobility capabilities. Workforce implications include the need for skilled aircraft mechanics and technicians in California.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potentially increases costs.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing due to non-competitive nature.
  • Long-term sustainment contracts can sometimes mask inefficiencies if not closely monitored.

Positive Signals

  • Ensures critical sustainment for a vital military asset (C-17).
  • Boeing's established expertise in C-17 manufacturing suggests high technical capability.
  • Long contract duration provides stability for planning and resource allocation.

Sector Analysis

The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by high barriers to entry, significant R&D investment, and long product lifecycles. Sustainment contracts like this are crucial for maintaining the operational readiness of complex military platforms. Spending in this area is often dictated by strategic defense needs rather than market fluctuations. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the unique nature of military aircraft sustainment and the proprietary data of contractors.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component. As a sole-source award to a large prime contractor, there is a potential for limited subcontracting opportunities for small businesses unless specifically mandated. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on Boeing's subcontracting strategy and any government requirements for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's contract management agencies, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Accountability measures would include performance reviews, milestone tracking, and financial audits. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but contract modifications and performance reports are usually available through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

  • C-17 Globemaster III Operations and Support
  • Air Mobility Command Sustainment Programs
  • Defense Logistics Agency Aircraft Parts Procurement
  • Aircraft Manufacturing and Maintenance Services

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Lack of competitive pricing

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, aircraft-manufacturing, sustainment, c-17, the-boeing-company, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, delivery-order, california, aircraft-manufacturing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $112.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. C-17 SUSTAINMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $112.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-04-16. End: 2024-09-30.

What is Boeing's track record with C-17 sustainment contracts?

Boeing has been the sole manufacturer of the C-17 Globemaster III since its inception and has historically been the primary provider of sustainment services. Their track record is extensive, encompassing production, upgrades, and ongoing maintenance for the global C-17 fleet. This long-standing relationship suggests a deep understanding of the aircraft's complex systems and operational requirements. However, the lack of competition in sustainment over the years means that performance metrics and cost-effectiveness are often evaluated internally or through limited government reviews rather than direct market comparisons.

How does the pricing of this sole-source contract compare to potential competitive bids?

Direct comparison of this sole-source contract's pricing to potential competitive bids is not feasible without access to proprietary cost data and market analysis. Sole-source awards inherently bypass the price discovery mechanism of competitive bidding, which typically drives down costs. The government relies on negotiation and cost-reimbursement structures, along with audits, to ensure reasonableness. Without competitive benchmarks, it is challenging to definitively state if this $112.9 million award represents optimal value for taxpayers compared to what might have been achieved through a competed process.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source sustainment contract for critical aircraft?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source sustainment contract for critical aircraft like the C-17 include potential cost overruns due to the absence of competitive pressure, reduced incentive for contractor efficiency, and a lack of innovation. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, where the government becomes overly reliant on a single provider, potentially limiting future flexibility. Furthermore, without open competition, ensuring the most advanced or cost-effective sustainment solutions are being employed can be more challenging, requiring robust government oversight and negotiation.

How effective is the C-17 sustainment program in ensuring the operational readiness of the U.S. Air Force's air mobility fleet?

The C-17 sustainment program, managed by Boeing, is generally considered effective in maintaining the operational readiness of the U.S. Air Force's air mobility fleet. The C-17 is a critical asset for strategic airlift, and its availability is paramount. Historical performance suggests that Boeing has met the demands for keeping these aircraft flying. However, the effectiveness is often measured against internal readiness goals and availability rates rather than direct comparisons to alternative sustainment models. Continuous monitoring and performance metrics are key to ensuring ongoing effectiveness.

What are the historical spending patterns for C-17 sustainment, and how does this award fit within that trend?

Historical spending on C-17 sustainment has been substantial, reflecting the aircraft's importance and the complexity of its maintenance requirements. Annual sustainment costs can run into hundreds of millions of dollars across the entire fleet. This $112.9 million award represents a significant portion of the total sustainment budget for a specific period (April 2018 to September 2024). While specific year-over-year spending can fluctuate based on maintenance needs, upgrades, and contract actions, this award aligns with the established trend of significant, ongoing investment required to maintain the C-17 fleet's operational capability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14441 ASTRONAUTICS LN, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, 92647

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $148,386,632

Exercised Options: $148,386,632

Current Obligation: $112,910,432

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA852612D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2018-04-16

Current End Date: 2024-09-30

Potential End Date: 2024-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-12

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending