DoD's $28.9M BAE Systems Contract for AN/APX-113 Depot Activation Lacks Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,908,720 ($28.9M)
Contractor: BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-12-20
End Date: 2016-01-18
Contract Duration: 1,855 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: DEPOT ACTIVATION FOR AN/APX-113
Place of Performance
Location: GREENLAWN, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11740, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.9 million to BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC. for work described as: DEPOT ACTIVATION FOR AN/APX-113 Key points: 1. Significant spending on a critical defense system. 2. Sole-source award to BAE Systems raises competition concerns. 3. Long contract duration (1855 days) warrants close monitoring. 4. Engineering services sector is prone to cost overruns without competition.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is 'COST NO FEE', which can lead to cost overruns as the contractor is reimbursed for costs incurred without a fixed profit margin. The total award amount is $28,908,720.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these engineering services.
Public Impact
Impacts Air Force readiness and operational capabilities. Potential for increased costs due to lack of competitive bidding. Highlights reliance on a single contractor for critical defense technology.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost-reimbursement contract type
- Long contract duration
- No small business participation indicated
Positive Signals
- Award to established defense contractor
- Supports critical Air Force technology
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), a sector often characterized by specialized expertise. Benchmarks for similar depot activation contracts are difficult to ascertain without competitive data.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication of small business participation in this contract. The award went to a large prime contractor, BAE Systems, suggesting limited opportunities for small businesses in this specific procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'COST NO FEE' contract type requires robust oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable. The long duration necessitates continuous monitoring of performance and expenditures by the Department of the Air Force.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-reimbursement contract type
- Long contract duration
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency on justification for sole-source award
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, ny, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.9 million to BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC.. DEPOT ACTIVATION FOR AN/APX-113
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-12-20. End: 2016-01-18.
What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies typically require detailed documentation, such as a Justification and Approval (J&A), to support sole-source procurements. This document should outline the market research conducted and explain why only one source could meet the requirement. Without this, it's difficult to assess if taxpayers received fair value.
How were costs validated and controlled under the 'COST NO FEE' contract type over its 1855-day duration?
Cost-reimbursement contracts, especially 'COST NO FEE' types, demand stringent oversight to manage expenditures. The government must actively audit contractor costs, ensure they are reasonable and allocable to the contract, and monitor performance against milestones. The long duration amplifies the need for continuous vigilance to prevent cost creep and ensure the project remains within budgetary expectations.
What is the long-term strategic impact of relying on a single vendor for critical depot activation services?
Sole-source reliance on BAE Systems for AN/APX-113 depot activation could create long-term strategic risks. It may stifle innovation, reduce future competition, and make the Department of Defense vulnerable to price increases or supply chain disruptions. Diversifying the vendor base or developing organic government capabilities could mitigate these risks and ensure greater flexibility.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: BAE Systems PLC (UEI: 217304393)
Address: 450 PULASKI RD, GREENLAWN, NY, 11740
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,089,877
Exercised Options: $28,908,720
Current Obligation: $28,908,720
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $90,205
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-12-20
Current End Date: 2016-01-18
Potential End Date: 2016-01-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-02-20
More Contracts from BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
- Limited Interim Missile Warning System (limws) A-Kits and B-Kits — $493.3M (Department of Defense)
- ALR 56C — $453.3M (Department of Defense)
- ALE-70 Production — $379.6M (Department of Defense)
- Digital Electronic Warfare System (dews) — $364.5M (Department of Defense)
- Global Positioning System Military Users Equipment Miniature Serial Interface Receiver Card Program With Next Generation Application Specific Integrated Circuit Increment 2 — $360.0M (Department of Defense)
View all BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)