DoD's $15.3M contract for administrative management services awarded to Anteon Corporation shows potential value concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,287,235 ($15.3M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-06-22

End Date: 2011-11-19

Contract Duration: 2,341 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200509!001322!5700!FA8501!WR-ALC PKO !FA850105C0021 !A!N! !Y! !P00001!20050622!20060630!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!65968!153!13!ROBINS AFB !HOUSTON !GEORGIA !+000003726729!N!N!000000000000!J099!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!002!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!D!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31098

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200509!001322!5700!FA8501!WR-ALC PKO !FA850105C0021 !A!N! !Y! !P00001!20050622!20060630!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!65968!153!13!ROBINS AFB !HOUS… Key points: 1. The contract's value appears high relative to its duration and the number of competitors. 2. Limited public data makes a definitive value-for-money assessment challenging. 3. The competition level suggests a potentially favorable outcome for the government, but price analysis is needed. 4. Performance context is minimal, hindering a full understanding of the services rendered. 5. This contract falls within the broader IT and professional services sector for the Department of Defense. 6. Risk indicators are moderate, primarily stemming from the lack of detailed performance and cost data.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $15.3 million over a period of approximately 6 years (from June 2005 to November 2011) suggests an average annual spend of roughly $2.55 million. Without specific performance metrics or a breakdown of services rendered, it is difficult to benchmark this against similar contracts. The presence of two bidders in a full and open competition might indicate some level of price negotiation, but the final price relative to the value delivered remains unclear. Further analysis of the specific tasks performed and their criticality would be necessary for a more robust value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with two bids received. While having multiple bidders is generally positive for price discovery, a low number of bids (two) can sometimes indicate a less robustly competed market or specific barriers to entry. The government likely benefited from some level of competition, but the extent to which this drove down costs compared to a scenario with more bidders is not explicitly detailed.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with two bidders, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it allows for a broader range of potential providers to compete, theoretically leading to better pricing and service options.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Air Force, receiving administrative management and general management consulting services. The services provided likely supported various operational and administrative functions within the Air Force. The geographic impact is centered around Robins AFB, Georgia, where the contract was managed. The contract supported the workforce of Anteon Corporation, a private sector entity.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance data makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services provided.
The relatively short contract duration (approx. 6 years) for a significant dollar amount might indicate a need for frequent re-competition or scope adjustments.
Limited information on the specific nature of the 'administrative management and general management consulting services' hinders a precise risk assessment.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair process for selecting the contractor.
The contract was awarded to a single entity, Anteon Corporation, implying a clear line of accountability for performance.
The contract was managed by Robins AFB, a significant Air Force installation, indicating a direct link to operational needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically under administrative management and general management consulting services. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for similar consulting and administrative support services across various defense and civilian agencies. The market for these services is generally competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Anteon Corporation, is likely a large business. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not detailed in the provided data, but it is common for large prime contractors to utilize small businesses for specialized support services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer at Robins AFB. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the firm-fixed-price contract, including delivery schedules and performance expectations. Transparency is limited by the nature of the data provided; detailed performance reports and cost breakdowns are typically not publicly available for contracts of this type.

Related Government Programs

Defense-wide Administrative Support Contracts
Professional Services Contracts
Management and Consulting Services
Air Force Operational Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Ambiguity in the scope of services provided.
Limited number of bidders in a full and open competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200509!001322!5700!FA8501!WR-ALC PKO !FA850105C0021 !A!N! !Y! !P00001!20050622!20060630!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!65968!153!13!ROBINS AFB !HOUSTON !GEORGIA !+000003726729!N!N!000000000000!J099!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !3! ! !C! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-06-22. End: 2011-11-19.

What specific administrative management and general management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT' and broadly categorized under 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541611). However, the specific nature of the services rendered is not detailed. It could encompass a wide range of activities, from logistical support and equipment maintenance management to strategic planning, organizational efficiency improvements, and policy development. Without further documentation, such as the Statement of Work (SOW) or contract modifications, the precise scope of services remains ambiguous. This lack of specificity makes it challenging to fully assess the contract's effectiveness and value.

How does the $15.3 million award amount compare to similar contracts for administrative management services within the Department of Defense?

Benchmarking the $15.3 million award requires comparing it to contracts with similar scopes of work, durations, and agencies. Given the broad categorization, direct comparisons are difficult without more specific service details. However, for large-scale administrative and management consulting contracts within the DoD, $15.3 million over approximately six years (June 2005 - November 2011) represents an average annual value of roughly $2.55 million. This figure is within the typical range for significant support contracts. To provide a more precise comparison, one would need to analyze contracts for similar services awarded around the same period, considering factors like the specific branch of service, the complexity of the tasks, and the geographic location of the support.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Anteon Corporation's performance under this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics that were used to evaluate Anteon Corporation. For a firm-fixed-price contract like this, performance is typically assessed against the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW), including timely delivery of services, adherence to quality standards, and meeting any specified milestones. Performance evaluations are often documented in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) records, which are not detailed here. Without access to these records or the contract's SOW, it is impossible to identify the specific KPIs used.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Department of the Air Force?

The provided data represents a single contract award from 2005. To understand the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Department of the Air Force (DAF), a broader analysis of federal procurement data over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve aggregating spending across various contracts awarded under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) and potentially related codes. Such an analysis would reveal trends in spending levels, identify major contractors, and highlight shifts in the types of services procured over time. This single data point is insufficient to establish a comprehensive historical spending pattern.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with Anteon Corporation's performance or the contract's execution?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific risks or challenges encountered during the execution of this contract or with Anteon Corporation's performance. Contract award data typically focuses on the terms of the agreement, contractor identity, and financial aspects, rather than ongoing performance issues or identified risks unless they led to contract modifications, disputes, or termination. To assess potential risks, one would need to consult performance reports (like CPARS), contract modification histories, or any publicly available audit reports or inspector general investigations related to this specific contract or contractor during the period of performance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD, FAIRFAX, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,301,022

Exercised Options: $15,301,022

Current Obligation: $15,287,235

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline