Booz Allen Hamilton contract for computer systems design services awarded by the Department of Defense for over $16.2 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,237,138 ($16.2M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-05-14

End Date: 2007-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,142 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200408!000081!5700!GN10 !HQ CPSG/RMK !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!FA830704F8504! !20040514!20050516!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!65000!029!48!SAN ANTONIO !BEXAR !TEXAS !+000000819000!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200408!000081!5700!GN10 !HQ CPSG/RMK !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!FA830704F8504! !20040514!20050516!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!65000!029!48!SAN ANTONIO !BEXA… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for computer systems design services, indicating a need for specialized IT support. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 1142 days (over 3 years) points to a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract was a delivery order, suggesting it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, is a large, established firm with significant experience in government contracting. 6. The contract was awarded to a company located in McLean, Virginia, a hub for government contractors.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $16.2 million for computer systems design services over approximately three years appears reasonable given the contractor's expertise and the nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for complex IT solutions would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the absence of specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns makes a definitive value judgment challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but this method of procurement generally fosters price competition and allows the government to select the best value offer. The competitive nature suggests that the pricing is likely to be market-driven.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best possible price and quality for the services rendered, reducing the risk of overpayment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely Department of Defense agencies requiring advanced computer systems design and integration support. Services delivered likely include the design, development, implementation, and maintenance of complex computer systems. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Defense, with potential implications for military operations and readiness. Workforce implications may include the employment of skilled IT professionals by Booz Allen Hamilton to fulfill the contract requirements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's effectiveness and efficiency.
The 'Time and Materials' contract type can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Limited transparency on the specific deliverables and outcomes of the computer systems design services.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
Contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, has a strong track record in government IT services.
The contract duration indicates a sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically in computer systems design services. This is a critical area for government operations, encompassing everything from network infrastructure to software development and cybersecurity. The market for IT services to the federal government is substantial, with agencies constantly seeking to modernize their systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large IT service contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar system design and integration work.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to a major prime contractor, it may present opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. However, without specific subcontracting plans or data, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear. Large prime contractors often have established relationships with small business partners, but the extent of this contract's subcontracting is not detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is often facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting, though detailed operational oversight information may be limited.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense IT Modernization Programs
Computer Systems Design Services Contracts
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) IT Contracts
Federal Civilian IT Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of detailed performance metrics for assessing contractor effectiveness.
Limited transparency on specific project deliverables and outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200408!000081!5700!GN10 !HQ CPSG/RMK !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!FA830704F8504! !20040514!20050516!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !MC LEAN !VA!22102!65000!029!48!SAN ANTONIO !BEXAR !TEXAS !+000000819000!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-05-14. End: 2007-06-30.

What is the track record of Booz Allen Hamilton in delivering computer systems design services to the Department of Defense?

Booz Allen Hamilton is a well-established government contractor with extensive experience in providing IT services, including computer systems design, to the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. They have a long history of supporting complex defense programs, often involving large-scale system integration, modernization, and cybersecurity solutions. Their track record generally includes successful delivery on numerous large contracts, though like any large firm, they may have faced challenges or scrutiny on specific projects. Analyzing their past performance ratings and any contract disputes or awards would provide a more granular view of their specific capabilities and reliability in this domain.

How does the $16.2 million contract value compare to similar computer systems design services contracts awarded by the DoD?

The $16.2 million contract value for computer systems design services over approximately three years is a significant but not exceptionally large sum within the context of major Department of Defense IT procurements. The DoD frequently awards IT contracts in the tens or hundreds of millions, and sometimes billions, of dollars for complex system design, development, and integration. This particular contract's value suggests a substantial project, likely involving specialized expertise or a significant scope of work. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to benchmark against contracts with similar service descriptions (e.g., system architecture, software engineering, network design) and durations awarded within the same or adjacent fiscal years.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of 'Time and Materials' contract for computer systems design?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like the one indicated by 'pt': 'TIME AND MATERIALS', carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. For computer systems design, where the scope of work can evolve or be difficult to precisely define upfront, T&M contracts can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently. The government pays for the labor hours and materials used, which can escalate if project timelines extend or if resource utilization is inefficient. Key risks include: potential for scope creep without adequate controls, difficulty in establishing a fixed price for evolving requirements, and the need for robust government oversight to monitor labor hours and material costs effectively to ensure fair pricing and prevent waste.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' award type signify for the effectiveness of this procurement?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' award type signifies that the government solicited bids from all eligible and responsible sources, without any restrictive limitations on participation. This is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring fair and transparent procurement, fostering robust price competition, and maximizing the potential for obtaining the best value (balancing cost and technical merit). It implies that the government actively sought out multiple offers, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions. The effectiveness is further realized if the evaluation criteria were clearly defined and appropriately weighted to select the offer that best meets the government's needs.

How has federal spending on computer systems design services evolved over the past decade, and where does this contract fit?

Federal spending on computer systems design services has generally seen a consistent increase over the past decade, driven by the ongoing need for IT modernization, cybersecurity enhancements, and the adoption of new technologies across government agencies. The Department of Defense, in particular, represents a significant portion of this spending due to the complexity and scale of its technological requirements. This $16.2 million contract, awarded in 2004, fits within the historical pattern of substantial investments in IT infrastructure and services by the DoD. While specific year-over-year trends fluctuate based on budget allocations and strategic priorities, the overall trajectory indicates a sustained demand for these specialized IT capabilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR # 700, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0306J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline