Air Force awards $13.5M contract for security support services to General Dynamics One Source LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,500,941 ($13.5M)

Contractor: General Dynamics ONE Source LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-02-24

End Date: 2029-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,465 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (SSS) FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE (DAF).

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22042

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC for work described as: SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (SSS) FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE (DAF). Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost control but requires careful oversight. 3. Delivery order under a larger contract suggests a phased approach to service delivery. 4. The duration of the contract is over four years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 5. The contract is for 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services', a broad category. 6. The awardee, General Dynamics One Source LLC, is a significant player in the defense contracting space.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.5 million over approximately four years for security support services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized security consulting services within the Department of Defense is necessary for a definitive value assessment. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure requires diligent monitoring to ensure costs remain aligned with the fixed fee and the overall value delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources'. This implies that while the competition was open, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria, potentially narrowing the field of bidders. The presence of two bidders suggests a moderate level of competition, which is generally favorable for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with exclusions, is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple firms to offer their best pricing and solutions, potentially leading to cost savings.

Public Impact

The Department of the Air Force will benefit from enhanced security support services. Services delivered are likely to include consulting and technical support related to security protocols and infrastructure. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the contract is managed. Workforce implications may include the utilization of specialized security personnel by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The CPFF contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants scrutiny to ensure it was justified and did not unduly limit competition.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting a degree of market validation.
Long-term contract duration indicates a stable and ongoing requirement for these critical services.
The contractor, General Dynamics One Source LLC, has a substantial presence in the federal contracting market.

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' sector is broad and encompasses a wide range of specialized expertise. Within the defense industry, such services are crucial for maintaining operational effectiveness and security. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar security support contracts within the Department of Defense can range significantly based on the specific nature of the services and the complexity of the requirements.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside criterion (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary focus was on obtaining the best technical solution and price from qualified large businesses. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist but are not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures will be tied to performance metrics and adherence to the contract terms. Transparency is facilitated through the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), where contract awards are reported.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Security Services
Air Force IT and Technical Support Contracts
Federal Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF)
Limited Competition Due to Source Exclusion
Performance Monitoring for Security Services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC. SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (SSS) FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE (DAF).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-02-24. End: 2029-02-28.

What is the track record of General Dynamics One Source LLC in providing similar security support services to the Department of Defense?

General Dynamics One Source LLC, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, has a significant history of contracting with the U.S. federal government, including the Department of Defense. They are known for providing a wide array of services, including IT, logistics, and professional services. While specific details on their performance for 'security support services' under a CPFF contract would require a deeper dive into past performance reviews and contract databases, their established presence suggests they possess the necessary infrastructure and experience. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving technical consulting and security, would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and effectiveness in meeting complex requirements.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar security support contracts within the Air Force or DoD?

The awarded amount of approximately $13.5 million over a period of roughly four years for security support services needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. The 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' category is broad, making direct comparisons challenging without more specific service details. However, for specialized security consulting and support within the Department of Defense, contract values can vary widely. Factors such as the level of security clearance required, the complexity of the systems supported, and the duration of the engagement significantly influence pricing. A thorough comparison would involve identifying contracts with similar scopes of work, service levels, and contract types (like CPFF) awarded by the Air Force or other DoD branches in recent years.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for security support services?

The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts, as costs are reimbursed. While the fixed fee provides some incentive for efficiency, there's a risk of cost overruns if the contractor's actual costs exceed initial estimates significantly. For the government, this necessitates robust oversight to ensure that costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. The 'security support services' aspect adds another layer of risk, as failures in security can have severe consequences. Therefore, performance monitoring and quality assurance are critical to mitigate risks related to service delivery and security breaches.

What does the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' clause imply for the procurement process and potential savings?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' clause indicates that the solicitation was initially open to all responsible sources, but certain sources were subsequently excluded based on specific, documented reasons. This could be due to factors like past performance issues, inability to meet specific technical requirements, or other pre-defined criteria. While it aims to ensure a competitive environment, the exclusion of sources can potentially limit the number of bidders, which might reduce the competitive pressure on pricing compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The justification for these exclusions is crucial for ensuring fairness and maximizing potential taxpayer savings.

What are the potential implications of this contract on the broader cybersecurity or security consulting market within the federal sector?

This contract award to General Dynamics One Source LLC signifies continued government investment in specialized security support services. For the broader market, it highlights the ongoing demand for expertise in areas such as threat assessment, security policy development, and technical security consulting. The CPFF structure and the specific nature of the services could influence how other contractors price and structure their proposals for similar future opportunities. Furthermore, the exclusion of certain sources, if widely adopted or perceived as a trend, could shape market entry strategies for new or smaller firms seeking to compete for federal security contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Wico Limited

Address: 3150 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 100, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,000,000

Exercised Options: $14,000,000

Current Obligation: $13,500,941

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA824023D3501

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline