Boeing awarded $42.8M for engineering support, facing no competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $42,827,849 ($42.8M)
Contractor: THE Boeing Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-02-01
End Date: 2027-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,063 days
Daily Burn Rate: $40.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MULTIPLE PLATFORMS.
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73135
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $42.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MULTIPLE PLATFORMS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, established provider, raising questions about potential cost efficiencies. 2. The fixed-price incentive contract structure aims to align contractor performance with government objectives. 3. Long-term duration of nearly three years suggests a need for sustained engineering expertise. 4. Focus on multiple platforms indicates a broad scope of critical support requirements. 5. Geographic concentration in Oklahoma may point to specific operational needs or facilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $42.8 million over nearly three years for engineering support services requires careful benchmarking against similar contracts. Without competitive bidding, it's challenging to definitively assess if this represents optimal value for money. The fixed-price incentive structure suggests an attempt to control costs, but the absence of competition limits the ability to compare pricing against market alternatives. Further analysis would involve examining the specific engineering tasks and the complexity of the platforms supported to gauge reasonableness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple potential providers. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or when urgency dictates a rapid award. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery mechanisms that typically occur in a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to higher costs than might be achieved otherwise.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure to drive down prices. The government's negotiating position is weakened without alternative offers to consider.
Public Impact
The Department of the Air Force benefits from continuous engineering support for its multiple platforms. This contract ensures the operational readiness and sustainment of critical defense systems. The services are primarily delivered in Oklahoma, supporting local operations and potentially local technical expertise. The contract supports specialized engineering roles, contributing to the technical workforce within the defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to inflated pricing.
- Sole-source awards can reduce transparency in cost justification.
- Dependence on a single contractor can create long-term risks if performance degrades.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price incentive contract aims to control costs and reward performance.
- Long-term award provides stability for critical engineering support.
- Award to Boeing, a major defense contractor, suggests access to established expertise.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader aerospace and defense industry. The market for specialized engineering support for complex military platforms is often dominated by a few large, established contractors due to the high barriers to entry, including security clearances, specialized knowledge, and existing relationships. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by the continuous need to maintain and upgrade sophisticated defense assets. Benchmarking would involve comparing this contract's value and scope to other engineering support contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies to similar large aerospace firms.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to include a small business set-aside. Given the sole-source nature and the prime contractor being The Boeing Company, there is a potential for limited direct subcontracting opportunities for small businesses unless specifically mandated or pursued by the prime. The absence of a set-aside means that small businesses are not directly benefiting from this specific award, and their role would likely be determined by Boeing's subcontracting strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Department of the Air Force, likely through contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded within the fixed-price incentive contract terms, which link contractor payment to performance metrics and cost targets. Transparency may be limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, but contract details and performance reports are typically available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Aerospace Engineering Services
- Defense Platform Support
- Air Force Logistics and Maintenance
- Fixed-Price Contracts
- Sole-Source Procurements
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost overruns
- Long-term contract duration
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, engineering-services, fixed-price-incentive, sole-source, boeing, oklahoma, platform-support, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $42.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MULTIPLE PLATFORMS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $42.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-02-01. End: 2027-12-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for engineering support services for these specific platforms by the Department of the Air Force?
Analyzing historical spending for engineering support on similar platforms by the Air Force is crucial for context. While specific data for 'multiple platforms' is broad, examining past contracts awarded to Boeing or other major defense contractors for engineering services on comparable aircraft, missile systems, or other defense assets can reveal trends. For instance, if previous contracts for similar support averaged $10-15 million annually, the current $42.8 million over approximately three years ($14.2 million annually) might appear reasonable. However, if historical spending was significantly lower, or if the scope of work has not demonstrably increased, the current award warrants closer scrutiny regarding its justification and potential for cost overruns, especially given the sole-source nature.
How does the pricing structure of this fixed-price incentive contract compare to industry standards for similar engineering support?
The fixed-price incentive (FPI) contract aims to balance cost control with performance incentives. In an FPI contract, the government and contractor agree on target costs, target profits, and a ceiling price. If the final cost is below the target, both share in the savings. If it exceeds the target but stays below the ceiling, the profit is reduced. If it exceeds the ceiling, the contractor absorbs the loss. For engineering support services, FPI contracts are often used when the scope is well-defined but there's potential for cost variations. Benchmarking this contract would involve comparing its target cost, ceiling price, and incentive sharing ratios against similar FPI contracts for defense engineering support. Without access to the specific target cost and ceiling details, a precise comparison is difficult, but the overall structure suggests an effort to achieve value by incentivizing efficiency.
What are the specific risks associated with relying on a sole-source provider like Boeing for extended engineering support?
Sole-source awards, particularly for extended periods, carry inherent risks. The primary risk is the lack of competitive pressure, which can lead to complacency and potentially higher costs or reduced innovation from the contractor. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, where the government becomes heavily reliant on a single provider, making it difficult and costly to switch even if performance issues arise or better alternatives emerge. Furthermore, if Boeing experiences internal financial difficulties or shifts its strategic priorities, it could impact the continuity and quality of the engineering support provided. The government's negotiating leverage is also diminished, making it harder to secure favorable terms or address performance deficiencies proactively.
What performance metrics and deliverables are included in this contract to ensure accountability?
Accountability in this fixed-price incentive contract is primarily driven by the performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract's statement of work (SOW). While the specific metrics are not detailed in the provided data, typical performance indicators for engineering support services include on-time delivery of technical reports, successful completion of design reviews, adherence to project milestones, quality of engineering analyses, and responsiveness to technical queries. The 'incentive' aspect of the contract implies that achieving or exceeding certain performance targets will result in a higher profit margin for Boeing, up to the negotiated ceiling price. Conversely, failure to meet critical requirements could lead to reduced profit or penalties, depending on the contract's specific clauses.
How does the $42.8 million contract value compare to the overall spending on engineering services within the Department of the Air Force?
The $42.8 million awarded to Boeing represents a portion of the Department of the Air Force's (DAF) total expenditure on engineering services. The DAF's annual budget is in the tens of billions of dollars, encompassing a vast array of programs and operational costs. Engineering services, including research, development, testing, and sustainment support, constitute a significant but specific category within this budget. To contextualize the $42.8 million, one would need to compare it against the DAF's total annual spending on engineering services, which can fluctuate based on modernization efforts and operational tempo. If the DAF spends hundreds of millions or even billions annually on engineering support across all its platforms, this contract, while substantial, might represent a moderate allocation for specific, long-term platform sustainment needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6001 S AIR DEPOT BLVD, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73135
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $42,827,849
Exercised Options: $42,827,849
Current Obligation: $42,827,849
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA810617D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-02-01
Current End Date: 2027-12-31
Potential End Date: 2027-07-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-14
More Contracts from THE Boeing Company
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (Department of Defense)
- International Space Station — $22.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200112!000108!9700!ZD60 !ballistic Missile Defense ORG. !HQ000601C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20001222!20080930!848025649!848025649!009256819!n!the Boeing Company !3370 E Miraloma AVE !anaheim !ca!92806!37000!089!01!huntsville !madison !alabama !+000383571022!n!n!000000000000!ad93!rdte/Other Defense-Adv Tech DEV !S1 !services !1caa!ballistic Missile Defense SYS !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !U!R!2!001!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $18.8B (Department of Defense)
- USN P-8A FRP II Long Lead Material — $18.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200512!010860!2100!w56hzv!tacom - Warren !w56hzv05c0724 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050923!20141231!016544780!016544780!009256819!n!the Boeing Company !J S Mcdonnell Blvd !saint Louis !mo!63166!65000!510!29!st. Louis !ST. Louis (city) !missouri !+000219245691!n!n!000000000000!az15!rdte/Other Research&development-Eng/Manuf Devel !S1 !services !301 !FCS !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !d!u!u!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! TAS::21 2040::TAS — $12.7B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)