Air Force awards $6.3M for F100-PW-229 combustion chamber remanufacturing to Chromalloy

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,300,000 ($6.3M)

Contractor: Chromalloy Component Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2026-01-08

End Date: 2026-09-26

Contract Duration: 261 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: REMANUFACTURE OF THE F100-PW-229 COMBUSTION CHAMBERS

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78226

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.3 million to CHROMALLOY COMPONENT SERVICES INC for work described as: REMANUFACTURE OF THE F100-PW-229 COMBUSTION CHAMBERS Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical aircraft engine components. 2. Competition dynamics for specialized engine parts manufacturing can influence pricing and innovation. 3. Performance risk is mitigated by the firm-fixed-price contract type, shifting cost overruns to the contractor. 4. This contract supports the operational readiness of Air Force aircraft utilizing the F100-PW-229 engine. 5. The sector for aircraft engine parts manufacturing is highly specialized and requires significant technical expertise.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.3 million for remanufacturing combustion chambers appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work and the critical components involved. Benchmarking against similar engine component repair contracts is challenging due to proprietary data and unique specifications. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation, and the contractor's ability to secure this award implies competitive pricing relative to their capabilities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to drive favorable pricing and ensure the government receives the best value. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust bidding environment for this specialized service.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive marketplace that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force, ensuring the continued operational readiness of aircraft powered by F100-PW-229 engines. The service delivered is the remanufacturing of critical combustion chambers, essential for engine performance and longevity. The geographic impact is primarily within Texas, where the contractor is located, potentially supporting local jobs and the regional aerospace supply chain. Workforce implications include the need for skilled technicians and engineers specializing in complex aerospace component repair and manufacturing.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions impacting delivery timelines.
Ensuring consistent quality across all remanufactured components is crucial for engine reliability.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risk for the government.
Award to a specialized component repair provider suggests technical capability.
Full and open competition indicates a healthy market for this service.

Sector Analysis

The aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing sector (NAICS 336412) is a highly specialized segment of the aerospace industry. It involves complex engineering, precision manufacturing, and stringent quality control. This contract fits within the broader defense industrial base, supporting the maintenance and sustainment of critical military assets. Spending in this sector is often driven by defense procurement cycles and the need to maintain aging aircraft fleets.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses is likely limited unless they are part of the supply chain for the prime contractor. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight. The firm-fixed-price nature provides a degree of financial oversight by defining the total cost. Accountability is managed through contract performance clauses and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases, though specific technical details of the remanufacturing process may be proprietary.

Related Government Programs

Aircraft Engine Repair and Overhaul
Aerospace Component Manufacturing
Defense Logistics and Sustainment
F100 Engine Maintenance Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions
Ensuring consistent quality of remanufactured parts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.3 million to CHROMALLOY COMPONENT SERVICES INC. REMANUFACTURE OF THE F100-PW-229 COMBUSTION CHAMBERS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHROMALLOY COMPONENT SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-08. End: 2026-09-26.

What is the historical spending trend for remanufacturing F100-PW-229 combustion chambers by the Air Force?

Analyzing historical spending for the remanufacturing of F100-PW-229 combustion chambers requires access to detailed contract databases over several fiscal years. Without specific historical data for this particular component, it's difficult to establish a precise trend. However, the F100 engine family has been in service for decades, suggesting a recurring need for maintenance and component remanufacturing. Spending in this area is typically influenced by the operational tempo of the Air Force fleet, the age of the engines, and the availability of spare parts. Fluctuations in annual spending could be attributed to the timing of major maintenance cycles, depot-level repair schedules, and the competitive landscape for remanufacturing services. A comprehensive analysis would involve tracking all contracts awarded for this specific service over time to identify patterns in award values, contract types, and contractor performance.

How does the awarded amount of $6.3 million compare to previous contracts for similar F100-PW-229 combustion chamber remanufacturing services?

Direct comparison of the $6.3 million award to previous contracts for the exact same service (remanufacturing of F100-PW-229 combustion chambers) is challenging without access to historical contract data for this specific line item. However, the value suggests a significant scope of work, likely encompassing multiple units or a comprehensive overhaul process. Factors influencing this value include the complexity of the remanufacturing process, the specific technical requirements, the number of units to be processed, and the prevailing market rates for specialized aerospace component repair. If previous contracts were for smaller quantities or less extensive remanufacturing, the $6.3 million could represent an increase due to inflation, increased demand, or a more comprehensive service package. Conversely, if previous contracts were for similar scope and value, this award might indicate stable market pricing.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to assess the contractor's performance on this contract?

While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, typical performance indicators for aerospace component remanufacturing contracts include adherence to delivery schedules, quality of workmanship (meeting technical specifications and defect rates), compliance with safety and environmental regulations, and overall cost control within the firm-fixed-price framework. The Air Force will likely monitor the number of rejected components, the turnaround time for remanufacturing, and the successful integration of the remanufactured parts back into operational engines. Performance metrics may also include documentation accuracy and responsiveness to government inquiries or inspections. Failure to meet these KPIs could result in contract remedies, including potential penalties or termination.

What is Chromalloy Component Services Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly for engine component repair?

Chromalloy Component Services Inc. is a known entity in the aerospace industry, specializing in the repair and overhaul of gas turbine engine components. Their track record with the Department of Defense (DoD) is likely extensive, given their focus on this sector. Companies like Chromalloy typically hold numerous contracts for various engine types and components across different military branches. To assess their specific track record for F100-PW-229 combustion chambers, one would need to review their past performance on similar DoD contracts, looking at factors such as on-time delivery, quality ratings, past performance evaluations, and any history of contract disputes or corrective actions. Their ability to win this $6.3 million contract suggests a positive or at least acceptable past performance record with the Air Force or other DoD entities.

What are the potential risks associated with the remanufacturing of critical aircraft engine components like combustion chambers?

The remanufacturing of critical aircraft engine components, such as combustion chambers, carries several inherent risks. A primary risk is the potential for undetected material flaws or defects that could compromise the component's integrity during operation, leading to engine failure and safety hazards. Another risk is the variability in the condition of components received for remanufacturing, which can impact the actual cost and time required, even under a fixed-price contract. Technological obsolescence or the availability of advanced repair techniques could also pose a risk if the remanufacturing process is not updated. Furthermore, supply chain disruptions for specialized materials or tooling needed for the remanufacturing process can lead to delays. Ensuring consistent quality control and rigorous testing throughout the remanufacturing cycle is paramount to mitigating these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Chromalloy SAN Diego Corp

Address: 303 INDUSTRIAL PK, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78226

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,300,000

Exercised Options: $6,300,000

Current Obligation: $6,300,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA812121D0022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline