Boeing Awarded $409.9M for Aircraft Fixed Wing Components, Facing Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $409,874,599 ($409.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-09-30

End Date: 2010-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $204.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200505!000013!5700!FA8106!OC-ALC/LAD CLS !FA810604C0006 !A!N! !N! !P00003!20041104!20050930!007237241!007237241!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !4615 SOUTH OLIVER !WICHITA !KS!67210!79000!173!20!WICHITA !SEDGWICK !KANSAS !+000000502896!N!N!000000000000!1510!AIRCRAFT FIXED WING !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !* !336411!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !D!U!J!1!001!N!1A!A!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WICHITA, SEDGWICK County, KANSAS, 67210

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $409.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 200505!000013!5700!FA8106!OC-ALC/LAD CLS !FA810604C0006 !A!N! !N! !P00003!20041104!20050930!007237241!007237241!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !4615 SOUTH OLIVER !WICHITA !KS!67210!79000!173!20!WICHITA !SEDG… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $409.9M awarded to The Boeing Company. 2. Limited competition raises questions about price discovery and potential overspending. 3. Contract duration of over 5 years suggests long-term reliance on this supplier. 4. The award falls within the Defense sector, specifically Aircraft Manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $409.9M for aircraft components appears high, especially given the limited competition. Benchmarking against similar fixed-wing aircraft airframe contracts is crucial to assess if this price is justified or inflated.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed, indicating a limited source selection process. This lack of competition may have led to a higher price than could have been achieved through a more open bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds may be at risk of being overspent due to the absence of competitive pressure on pricing.

Public Impact

Potential for higher defense spending due to lack of competition. Impact on the broader aerospace supply chain and availability of parts. Questions about the government's procurement strategy for critical aircraft components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition
  • High contract value
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Established supplier
  • Definitive contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract is within the Defense sector, specifically for Aircraft Fixed Wing components. The total obligated amount is substantial, suggesting a significant procurement for military aviation.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine their participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The limited competition aspect warrants further oversight to ensure the government secured the best possible value. Accountability for the procurement decision and pricing justification is essential.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition may lead to inflated prices.
  • Potential for reduced innovation due to single-source award.
  • Long-term commitment could lock in unfavorable terms.
  • Limited transparency in the procurement process.

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ks, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $409.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 200505!000013!5700!FA8106!OC-ALC/LAD CLS !FA810604C0006 !A!N! !N! !P00003!20041104!20050930!007237241!007237241!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !4615 SOUTH OLIVER !WICHITA !KS!67210!79000!173!20!WICHITA !SEDGWICK !KANSAS !+000000502896!N!N!000000000000!1510!AIRCRAFT FIXED WING !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !* !336411!E! !3! ! !C! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $409.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-30. End: 2010-03-31.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and what analysis was performed to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A thorough review would be necessary to understand the specific justification, such as a sole-source requirement or urgent need. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the fairness of the pricing, but the lack of competition inherently raises concerns about potential overpayment compared to a competitive scenario.

What are the risks associated with awarding such a large contract to a single supplier without competition?

The primary risk is financial: the government may have paid a premium due to the lack of competitive bidding. There's also a strategic risk of over-reliance on a single supplier, potentially impacting future negotiations or supply chain resilience. Furthermore, it could set a precedent for non-competitive awards in similar procurements.

How does this contract's value and terms compare to similar procurements for aircraft components?

Benchmarking this $409.9M contract against similar procurements for aircraft fixed-wing airframes and spares is critical. Given the 'NOT COMPETED' status and a duration extending over five years, a detailed comparison is needed to ascertain if the pricing is reasonable and if the government received adequate value for taxpayer money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4615 SOUTH OLIVER, WICHITA, KS, 67210

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-09-30

Current End Date: 2010-03-31

Potential End Date: 2010-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-05-19

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending