DoD awards $130M contract to Lockheed Martin for miscellaneous communication equipment

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,961,870 ($13.0M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-29

End Date: 2010-10-04

Contract Duration: 1,466 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200612!002336!5700!FA8103!OC-ALC/LID !FA810306C0311 !A!N! !N! ! !20060929!20060929!002232973!002232973!834951691!N!LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION !1801 STATE ROUTE 17C !OWEGO !NY!13827!55882!107!36!OWEGO !TIOGA !NEW YORK !+000003000000!N!N!000000000000!5895!MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !334511!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!A!D!N!J!1!001!N!2A!A!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!Y! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: OWEGO, TIOGA County, NEW YORK, 13827

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: 200612!002336!5700!FA8103!OC-ALC/LID !FA810306C0311 !A!N! !N! ! !20060929!20060929!002232973!002232973!834951691!N!LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION !1801 STATE ROUTE 17C !OWEGO !NY!13827!55882!107!36!OWEGO !TIOG… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, large defense contractor, indicating potential for limited competition. 2. The contract value of $130M is significant, requiring careful scrutiny of pricing and necessity. 3. The sector is IT/Defense, a high-spending area with ongoing technological advancements and risks. 4. The duration of the contract (over 4 years) suggests a long-term need, but also potential for cost overruns.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $130M for miscellaneous communication equipment over four years appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar DoD contracts for specialized communication systems is necessary to assess if this pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, suggesting a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpayment and reduced value for taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Impacts military communication capabilities, potentially affecting operational effectiveness. Supports a major defense contractor, contributing to jobs and the defense industrial base. Represents a significant allocation of federal funds towards defense-related technology.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns due to long duration
  • Sole-source award limits price transparency

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical defense infrastructure
  • Awarded to a well-established defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to IT and communication equipment. Defense spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need for advanced and reliable systems.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corporation, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this sole-source contract is crucial to ensure the government receives fair value and that the equipment meets all specified requirements. Regular performance reviews and cost audits would be advisable.

Related Government Programs

  • Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of detailed technical specifications
  • Long contract duration increases risk of obsolescence or cost creep
  • Potential for price inflation without competitive pressure

Tags

search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, ny, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. 200612!002336!5700!FA8103!OC-ALC/LID !FA810306C0311 !A!N! !N! ! !20060929!20060929!002232973!002232973!834951691!N!LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION !1801 STATE ROUTE 17C !OWEGO !NY!13827!55882!107!36!OWEGO !TIOGA !NEW YORK !+000003000000!N!N!000000000000!5895!MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !334511!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-29. End: 2010-10-04.

What specific communication capabilities does this contract address, and how critical are they to current military operations?

The contract is for 'MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT' and 'OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT'. While the exact nature is not detailed, such equipment is vital for command, control, and situational awareness in military operations. The criticality would depend on the specific systems being supported and their role in ongoing missions or strategic objectives.

Given the sole-source nature, what mechanisms are in place to ensure Lockheed Martin's pricing is reasonable and reflects fair market value?

For sole-source contracts, agencies typically rely on cost realism analyses, should-cost studies, and negotiation techniques to ensure fair pricing. The contracting officer would need to justify the price based on available cost data, historical pricing, or independent government cost estimates to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

How will the effectiveness and performance of this communication equipment be measured throughout the contract's duration?

Effectiveness is typically measured through performance metrics outlined in the contract's statement of work, such as reliability, uptime, and adherence to technical specifications. Acceptance testing upon delivery and ongoing operational feedback from end-users would also contribute to assessing performance and overall effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNavigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments ManufacturingSearch, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 1801 STATE ROUTE 17C, OWEGO, NY, 23

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-09-29

Current End Date: 2010-10-04

Potential End Date: 2010-10-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-04-27

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation

View all Lockheed Martin Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending