DoD's $30.9M contract for life-cycle product support awarded to MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,934,468 ($30.9M)

Contractor: Mantech TSG-2 Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-06-13

End Date: 2023-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,782 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: LIFE-CYCLE PRODUCT SUPPORT DATA, IETM&ASSOCIATED TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR PMA-261 AND COLLABORATING PROGRAMS

Place of Performance

Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20171

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.9 million to MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE for work described as: LIFE-CYCLE PRODUCT SUPPORT DATA, IETM&ASSOCIATED TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR PMA-261 AND COLLABORATING PROGRAMS Key points: 1. Contract provides essential life-cycle product support and associated technology services. 2. Competition was full and open, indicating a broad market engagement. 3. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. Performance period spans over 4 years, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 5. The contract is categorized under Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 6. The award was a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $30.9 million over approximately 4.7 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking this against similar life-cycle product support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure requires careful oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and that the fixed fee adequately compensates the contractor for their efforts without incentivizing excessive spending. The total value appears within a typical range for specialized technical support services in the defense sector.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of two bidders suggests a competitive environment, though the exact number of bids received is not specified. Full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer, potentially leading to more favorable pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive process, which aims to secure the most cost-effective solution for essential defense support services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense programs requiring life-cycle product support, ensuring operational readiness. Services delivered include IETM (Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals) and associated technology support. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the contracting agency (Defense Contract Management Agency) and the supported PMA-261 programs. Workforce implications include specialized technical and engineering roles required for product support and documentation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

CPFF contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not managed rigorously.
Limited information on specific performance metrics makes assessing value for money difficult.
The duration of the contract requires ongoing monitoring to ensure continued relevance and efficiency.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Contract provides critical support for defense programs, contributing to national security.
The contractor has a defined role in supporting specific PMA programs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting aviation programs (PMA-261). The market for life-cycle product support and technical documentation is specialized, often involving contractors with deep expertise in specific weapon systems or platforms. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining the readiness and longevity of complex military assets. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader defense logistics and sustainment categories.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, small businesses are unlikely to be direct prime contractors. However, the prime contractor, MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on the scope of work and subcontracting plans. The absence of a small business set-aside means opportunities for direct prime contracting were likely limited to larger, established firms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is listed as the servicing agency. Accountability measures would be embedded within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract terms, requiring detailed cost reporting and performance metrics. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed operational oversight information is typically internal to the DoD.

Related Government Programs

Defense Logistics Agency Support Contracts
Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Support Services
Aircraft Life-Cycle Management Programs
Technical Data and Documentation Services
Engineering Support Services

Risk Flags

Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF)
Performance Monitoring Complexity
Long-Term Dependency on Contractor

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.9 million to MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE. LIFE-CYCLE PRODUCT SUPPORT DATA, IETM&ASSOCIATED TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR PMA-261 AND COLLABORATING PROGRAMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-06-13. End: 2023-04-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for life-cycle product support for PMA-261 and related programs?

Analyzing historical spending for PMA-261 and related programs requires access to detailed procurement data beyond this single contract award. However, the current award of $30.9 million over approximately 4.7 years suggests an average annual spend of roughly $6.5 million for this specific support function. Defense programs, especially complex aviation systems, typically involve significant and sustained investment in life-cycle product support throughout their operational lifespan. This includes maintenance, repair, upgrades, and technical documentation. Trends in defense budgets, technological advancements, and program sustainment strategies would influence historical spending. Without prior contract data for this specific support requirement, it's difficult to establish a precise historical pattern, but it's reasonable to assume consistent funding for such critical operational support.

How does the contractor, MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE, perform on other government contracts?

MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE's performance on other government contracts can be assessed through various public databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). A review of these systems would reveal past performance ratings, any past performance issues, and the types of services they have provided. As a joint venture, its performance history might also be influenced by the track records of its parent companies. Generally, for a contract of this nature and value, the government would have conducted a pre-award assessment of the contractor's capabilities and past performance to ensure they could meet the requirements. Specific details on their performance history would require a deeper dive into CPARS reports, which are not publicly available in full detail.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, for a life-cycle product support and IETM contract, typical KPIs would likely include metrics related to the accuracy and timeliness of technical manual updates, the availability of support resources, response times to technical queries, and the overall effectiveness in supporting program readiness. Performance measurement under a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract often involves tracking cost performance against the estimated cost, ensuring the fixed fee is justified by the effort expended, and evaluating adherence to technical specifications and delivery schedules. The government contracting officer and administrative contracting officer would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs and ensuring the contractor meets the contractual obligations.

What is the risk associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this service?

The primary risk associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type is the potential for cost overruns. In a CPFF structure, the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. While the fee is fixed, the total cost is not. This means the government bears the risk of cost increases if the contractor's actual costs exceed initial estimates. Effective risk mitigation requires robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking, and clear definition of allowable costs. The government must ensure the contractor has strong internal controls and incentives to manage costs efficiently, as the contractor has less financial incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts.

How does this contract fit into the broader strategy for supporting PMA-261 programs?

This contract for life-cycle product support and associated technology is integral to the sustainment strategy for PMA-261 programs. PMA-261 is responsible for a range of naval aviation systems, and ensuring these complex platforms remain operational, maintainable, and supported by up-to-date technical documentation is critical. This contract likely supports the long-term readiness and cost-effectiveness of these systems by providing essential technical expertise and data management. It ensures that maintainers have accurate information and that the systems can be supported throughout their operational life, potentially reducing downtime and extending the service life of the aircraft or systems managed by PMA-261.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › OTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: FA807513R0001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12015 LEE JACKSON HWY, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,990,388

Exercised Options: $46,990,388

Current Obligation: $30,934,468

Actual Outlays: $1,399,372

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 9

Total Subaward Amount: $21,276,556

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA807514D0020

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline