Air Force awards $14.8M engineering contract to JBW FEDITC II JV LLC for Tyndall facility energy solutions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,884,252 ($14.9M)

Contractor: JBW Feditc II JV LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-22

End Date: 2026-09-21

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $40.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Engineering Services

Official Description: PROVIDE SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES WHICH RESULT IN ORGANIZED DATA, ANALYTICS, SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS WITHIN THE DAF FACILITY ENERGY COMMUNITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT 01 - PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR OEA TYNDALL

Place of Performance

Location: TYNDALL AFB, BAY County, FLORIDA, 32403

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to JBW FEDITC II JV LLC for work described as: PROVIDE SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES WHICH RESULT IN ORGANIZED DATA, ANALYTICS, SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS WITHIN THE DAF FACILITY ENERGY COMMUNITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT 01 - PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR OEA TYNDALL Key points: 1. Contract focuses on data, analytics, and technical expertise for facility energy management. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about competition and potential price discovery. 3. Risk of limited competition impacting value for money. 4. Sector is Engineering Services, with a significant contract value.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $14.8M for a 364-day period is substantial. Without comparable contracts or detailed cost breakdowns, assessing value for money is difficult, especially given the sole-source nature.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of full and open competition. This method limits price discovery and may not yield the best value for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source award limits the government's ability to leverage competitive pricing, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may not receive the best value due to the absence of competitive bidding. The specialized nature of the services could limit the pool of qualified contractors. Ensuring effective delivery of organized data and technical solutions is crucial for facility energy management.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for overpricing

Positive Signals

  • Specific technical expertise required
  • Focus on critical facility energy management

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is vital for government infrastructure and operations. Benchmarks for similar contracts are difficult to ascertain without more specific service details.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were considered or had the capability to perform this specialized work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will be critical to ensure the contractor delivers the required organized data, analytics, and technical solutions as outlined in the Performance Work Statement, especially given the sole-source nature of the award.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to lack of competition.
  • Risk of contractor not meeting specialized technical requirements.
  • Difficulty in benchmarking against similar contracts.
  • Limited transparency in price discovery.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, fl, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to JBW FEDITC II JV LLC. PROVIDE SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES WHICH RESULT IN ORGANIZED DATA, ANALYTICS, SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS WITHIN THE DAF FACILITY ENERGY COMMUNITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT 01 - PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR OEA TYNDALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JBW FEDITC II JV LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-22. End: 2026-09-21.

What specific technical expertise is required that necessitates a sole-source award, and how was this determined?

The justification for a sole-source award typically stems from unique capabilities, specialized knowledge, or urgent requirements that only one contractor can meet. For this contract, the specific technical expertise likely relates to highly specialized data organization, advanced analytics, and problem-solving within the DAF facility energy community, as detailed in Attachment 01. The government would have had to document why no other responsible source could satisfy the agency's needs.

How will the government ensure fair pricing and value for money with a sole-source contract?

Ensuring fair pricing in sole-source contracts relies heavily on robust government cost analysis, negotiation, and oversight. The government should scrutinize the contractor's proposed costs, compare them against independent government estimates, and potentially request detailed cost breakdowns. Continuous monitoring of performance and deliverables against the contract's objectives is also essential to validate that the value received aligns with the price paid.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the delivered services?

Effectiveness will be measured by the successful organization of data, the accuracy and utility of analytics provided, and the successful implementation of technical solutions to identified problems within the DAF facility energy community. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should include metrics related to data completeness and accuracy, the timeliness of analytical reports, the successful resolution of energy-related issues, and adherence to the Performance Work Statement's specific deliverables and objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 16414 SAN PEDRO AVE, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78232

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native Hawaiian Organization Owned Firm, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,379,664

Exercised Options: $14,884,252

Current Obligation: $14,884,252

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-22

Current End Date: 2026-09-21

Potential End Date: 2028-03-21 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-19

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending