Air Force awards $20.7M contract for integrated resilience services to Booz Allen Hamilton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,734,233 ($20.7M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-09-30

End Date: 2025-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PKF - CHWALIK - STS TASK ORDER FOR A1 INTEGRATED RESILIENCE

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20330

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.7 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: PKF - CHWALIK - STS TASK ORDER FOR A1 INTEGRATED RESILIENCE Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for administrative management and general management consulting services. 3. Duration of 1095 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 5. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 6. Services are to be delivered in Washington D.C.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20.7 million over three years for management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope of integrated resilience. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts for federal agencies suggests this is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, although it may limit flexibility if requirements evolve significantly. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process supports a presumption of fair pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. While not an exceptionally high number of bidders, full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offering. The specific details of the bidding process and evaluation criteria would provide further insight into the effectiveness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovative solutions. This approach maximizes the opportunity to secure the most advantageous terms for the government.

Public Impact

The Department of the Air Force benefits from enhanced integrated resilience capabilities. Services provided are expected to improve operational readiness and strategic planning. The primary geographic impact is within Washington D.C. The contract supports specialized consulting roles, potentially impacting the federal workforce in management and strategy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if resilience requirements are not clearly defined upfront.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical resilience services could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
Long contract duration allows for sustained focus on resilience objectives.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for resilience consulting is growing, driven by increasing awareness of complex threats. Comparable spending in this area can vary widely based on agency size and specific needs, but large federal consulting contracts often range in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over their lifecycle.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, Booz Allen Hamilton. The absence of set-aside provisions means that opportunities for small businesses to directly participate in this specific contract are limited unless they are part of a subcontracting plan developed by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Air Force. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and adherence to contract terms are key oversight functions. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which provide public access to award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Defense Management Consulting Services
Strategic Planning Support
Risk Management Services
Federal IT Consulting

Risk Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues
Risk of scope creep in complex service contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.7 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. PKF - CHWALIK - STS TASK ORDER FOR A1 INTEGRATED RESILIENCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-30. End: 2025-09-29.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with similar federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Booz Allen Hamilton is a major government contractor with extensive experience across various federal agencies, including a significant presence within the Department of Defense (DoD). They have a long history of providing management consulting, IT services, and strategic support. Their track record includes numerous large-scale contracts for complex projects, often involving national security, intelligence, and operational support. While specific performance details for individual contracts are not always publicly available, their consistent award of significant contracts by the DoD suggests a generally positive performance history and a strong understanding of military requirements. However, like any large contractor, they may have faced past performance issues or disputes on specific projects, which would be detailed in government past performance databases if publicly releasable.

How does the $20.7 million value compare to other integrated resilience contracts awarded by the Air Force or DoD?

The $20.7 million value for this three-year delivery order for integrated resilience services is substantial but falls within the typical range for large-scale consulting engagements within the Department of Defense. The DoD frequently awards contracts in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars for strategic planning, management, and technical services. Integrated resilience is a critical and complex area, encompassing physical security, cybersecurity, operational continuity, and supply chain robustness. Therefore, a contract of this magnitude suggests a comprehensive scope of work. Without access to specific details of other resilience contracts, direct comparison is difficult, but it is not an outlier for the scale and importance of services provided to a major military branch like the Air Force.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements for 'integrated resilience' might expand beyond the initial definition, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays. Another risk is contractor performance; if Booz Allen Hamilton fails to deliver the expected quality or effectiveness of services, the Air Force's resilience goals could be jeopardized. Mitigation strategies likely include robust contract management by the Air Force, clear definition and monitoring of performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and the firm fixed-price contract type which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs. The competitive award process also serves as a risk mitigation tool by selecting a contractor deemed capable of meeting the requirements.

What is the expected program effectiveness or outcome of these integrated resilience services?

The expected outcome of these integrated resilience services is a significantly enhanced ability for the Department of the Air Force to anticipate, withstand, adapt to, and recover from disruptions. This includes a more robust understanding and management of threats across physical, cyber, and operational domains. Program effectiveness will likely be measured by improvements in readiness, reduced downtime during incidents, better resource allocation for protective measures, and a more agile response capability. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure mission assurance and operational continuity in an increasingly complex and unpredictable environment, safeguarding critical assets and personnel.

What have been historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services within the Air Force?

Historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services within the Air Force are substantial and have generally trended upwards, reflecting the increasing complexity of military operations and the need for specialized expertise. The Air Force, like other branches of the DoD, relies heavily on external consultants for strategic planning, process improvement, organizational development, and specialized technical advice that may not be available in-house. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on specific program needs, budget allocations, and strategic priorities. The $20.7 million for this specific contract is one component of a much larger overall spending picture for consulting services, which collectively represent a significant investment in supporting Air Force missions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,617,150

Exercised Options: $27,732,739

Current Obligation: $20,734,233

Actual Outlays: $9,921,233

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $273,756

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA701420D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline